>Ute >Retro styling >6.0L V8 >Six speed manual >Removable

Which way is the front?

>almost the size and weight of a full size truck
>got the better engine and manual trans only in the last two years
It's the "car" no one needed and no one asked for.

>>17253250
Almost any Aussie ute is better

I wish we could get a Maloo up here

>>17253250
Did VW help Chevy design this car?

>>17253250
Shitty retro styling. PT Cruiser was prettier than that, and that one has "pity" in its name for a reason.

>>17253266
>It's the "car" no one needed and no one asked for
wouldn't that be perfect for /o/? it seems like every time people on here talk about what they want in a new car, it's something no one wants or needs.

>>17253250
Wtf is that thing?
Please tell me thats photoshop

>>17253250
>6.0 V8
I swore these only had a V6 in them. Also they are ugly as fuck.

They Chevy SS, which is the same exact thing without a shit exterior design and a V8 4-door RWD Sedan.

>>17253654
Yeah it's a photo shop. Tweet about it you tween summer fag

Dumb boomer poster

>>17253657
They had an anemic truck engine in the first iteration of them.

Then they said fuck it and put a corvette engine in it.

>>17253657
>I swore these only had a V6 in them.
You're thinking of the Plymouth boomer hot rod.

>>17253250
It's trying too hard to be cool and retro. The Ute looks far nicer.
>six speed manual
Did anyone even buy those? You know Americans can't drive stick.

>>17253250
Actually the roof is a retractable hardtop.

>>17253250
Legitmately one of the ugliest cars ever designed.

>>17253266
Almost my 2005 Silverado wieghs less and it's an extended cab

File: dakotaconvertible.jpg (44KB, 566x337px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 566x337px

>>17253250
The SSR is a truck, a butt ugly truck, but a truck.

>>17253250
Holy shit it's ugly

>>17253250
E39 m5

>>17253834
>boomer
this was marketed at Greatest Gen, not Boomers. it was literally based on a truck that ran from the late 40's to the mid 50's

Boomers are nostalgic for the 70's. It's greatest gen that pined for the 50's.

the problem of course is they were too goddamned late. Boomers became the prime market force back In the 70's and 80's, and Greatest gen declined in it's market force in the 90's

File: 15095711_1160357124077582_5470330168894934483_n.jpg (148KB, 960x573px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 960x573px

>>17254798
50's? no.. what year exactly

File: 1952_Chevrolet_Pickup_PBC612.jpg (34KB, 800x504px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 800x504px

>>17254825
the 1947-1955 Chevy Advanced Design truck line

File: Chevrolet_Advance_Design_3100_('10_A&W_St._Léonard).jpg (1MB, 3073x2121px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3073x2121px

>>17254825
>>17254847
the HHR was based on the same line, albeit the van configuration

File: 77090A6B-DEE5-47A8-8582-258328FAC881-46840-00002C2E6DC6BF76.jpg (32KB, 470x313px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 470x313px

All that, minus the disgusting """"retro"""" styling and the homosexual hardtop

>>17253250

Aaaand it flops

File: 33908210011_large.jpg (75KB, 750x406px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 750x406px

i'd take any of the aussie utes over that pos.

tub or tray, or better yet, a nice sandman

>>17254847
gross. the 56-59 was better. why did they do that

>>17254882
Post war wasn't the best time for car design until jets came along.

>>17254865
You don't konw shit. Retro styling and the homosexual hardtop is the best part.