>"""""""""""""""""""military

whoops forgot link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fVSdA1rYKE

>real actors, not people

>>17246014
People don't realize that "military grade" is made up of the cheapest materials feasible to perform a task

>>17246014
lancer ralliart

>>17246023
mindless sheeps will fall for anything

>>17246033
Right, imagine opening a restaurant bragging about "military grade" food

>>17246014
I mean I don't like Ford, but you could do this to any door.... they're all sheet metal...
> t. Shop fag

>>17246052
I've seen the video from op pic related and he takes a pair of pliers and tears the piece across in one go, does steel do that too? Honestly wondering

>>17246070
Yeah if you're strong enough its possible. I did this to a steel door when i was trying to get the glass out after the door was smashed in. The areas where the sheet metal is attached to the frame of the door will be a little harder though, some vars have the door skin glued to the frame.

>>17246052
This.
Are they using 7075-t6 or something?

>>17246070
Ya, I have no interest in owning a beer can truck, but you can do this to literally any door skin.

>>17246038
I would love to make people feel my pain. PX hotdogs, wawa coffee and mre snacks, fuck you all

>>17246023
don't forget it's made by blind people too

>>17246128
make the dfac public and be rolling in military grade earnings

>>17246070
Yes.

>>17246014
anyone who has ever been in the military will tell you that military grade is a synonym for awful,

>>17246362
wrong

>>17246014
Military Grade has no meaning nowadays. It's really more of a holdover from the days when JEDEC and other standards could be summarized to the layman as "military grade". Today's standards for steel and aluminum are defined by standards such as "501 Steel".

So, rather than "military grade aluminum", they should have specified the names of aluminum alloys.

>>17246023
This reminds when Rockford Fosgate would advertise their amps as having "military grade" heatsinks.

>>17246524
Or Motherboards in PCs.
Disappointed they started advertising that AFTER 3rd party stopped doing heavy traces.

>>17246014
>dat asmr

>>17246052
Try that in a old landcruiser or a Mercedes G.

>>17246070
The sheet is always thin, so even steel can be teared easily but it still has much more resistance to tear than aluminum, aluminum is a soft metal.
It has some advantages like not rusting and being light, but it's not strong

>>17246023
>hurr

It's made to and tested to conform to a benchmark. That it is made as cheaply as possible and yet still achieve that standard is irrelevant.

>Le military grade material

A meme

>>17246014
>military grade

Worked for a mil supplier years ago. Preliminary spec documents (not for release), some joker had added a mil spec reference:

MIL-TFD-41C "Make it like the fucking drawing for once"

>>17246014
You understand you can do to that to steel sheet metal as well right?

>>17247480
You can but there's a reason off-roaders should use steel wheels and not aluminum.

File: coffee instant.jpg (18KB, 240x280px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 240x280px

>>17246038
Sounds nice!

File: 1493571162726.jpg (51KB, 359x305px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 359x305px

>>17247787
wow, i think i just witnessed my first steve1989 meme.

ITT
RETARDS THINK ALUMINUM IS A THICK IMPENITRABLE STEEL IF THE PHRASE "MILITARY GRADE" IS IN FRONT OF IT


I BET YOU THINK GAMING COMPUTER CHAIRS ARE BETTER THAN OFFICE COMPUTER CHAIRS

File: comfy steve room.png (93KB, 426x364px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 426x364px

>>17248504
They hold up pretty well.

File: 1440041003448.png (3MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2048x1536px

>>17247666
What do the make up of wheels have anything to do with the properties of sheet metal?

Ill wait.

>>17246014
There is no such thing as "military grade" anything. There's mil-spec but there is no such thing as mil-spec aluminum at all. Aluminum is aluminum and the only thing about different kinds is purity and any alloy you wanna mix with it

>>17246014
>do something cars normally dont endure
>it breaks
woooooah

are door panels really that thin nowadays. My newest car is a 2005 jeep.. that has had some offroad fun and the door metal is not nearly that thin. Considering the things i have bounced it off, i pretty sure I would not be able to tear the door sheet metal.

>>17248636
Tearing and Puncturing involve two different properties of the metal.

Kind of how you can't puncture a bag of chips with your fingers but are able to open them tearing them apart.

>>17248675
good point, but i would think the issue with punching a bag of chips is that it isn't rigid, it is allowed to flex and there fore absorb energy. If it was rigid, in the same manner a door panel was, i think i cock poke my finger through it.

When i say bounced off, i mean sliding into a metal post, backing a trailer hitch into, etc.

File: mm1.png (355KB, 1015x1527px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 1015x1527px

>>17248675

>not punching your All Dressed open like a gorilla

who taught you to eat chips

>>17247146
Except when you stretch shit grade aluminum to thinner than a dime like in OP's pic, you get the results of thin, shitty aluminum

Surprise surprise

>>17248726
Door panels are not really that ridgid, You ever held a fender in your hands off of a car?

The rigidity comes from it being bolted down and supported like cross members.

>>17247105
You dont understand how things work.

>>17248510
In other news unimportant namefag displays his autism

>>17246014
Military grade raw materials does not imply military grade usage of materials. Military grade aluminum foil is still just aluminum foil.