If your car hasn't been used in legitimate motorsports, it's shit.
If your car was never entered in the baja 1000, it's shit.
You guys would say its shit anyway.
Has anyone ever used the crx or mk2 supra for motorsports...? It's all I've got
>>17236373
Uh. There's a WRC Yaris and the car is utter shit to drive.
heh
this is the 1.3l diesel model too
Bam!
>>17237339
OP said legitimate motorsports.
:^)
Feels good, man.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaU8_naccI0
47 seconds off the record, which is okay for a FWD car with mostly stock parts.
>>17236373
Plz explain
>>17237133
If your car has never won the Paris-Dakar, it's shit.
>>17237572
>his vehicle is limited to ELEVEN POINT EIGHT inches of suspension travel
cuck tier lmao
Although it drifts, I like it flying more.
>>17236373
look at them go.
Peugeot masterrace
>>17236373
Wow glad to know my a to b minitruck is shit
Guess I'm good then
>buy a FWD econobox because "it was in motorsports"
>the rally car version had a one-off AWD drivetrain and massively powerful engine you'll never be able to replicate, as well as differences in suspension, gearbox, and brakes
>call others' cars shit because they weren't "in motorsports"
>>17237886
>he didnt buy a car that was in motorsports
>>17237886
The rally car in the OP is for Rally America's 2WD class. FWD with stock powertrain, only changes are suspension/sequential box/roll cage.
See >>17237479