How do we deal with the supercharger problem???
>Awful noise
>Less reliable
>Worse mpg
>Less power
>Uglier
>>17084328
probably faster on a canyon road due to the powerband.
your average fucktard can't keep a turbo car in the pipe.
also more expensive and complex.
I don't think anyone with a brain actually believes chargers are better performing.
>>17084328
>go to make serious reply calling you a moron
>realize you're just a no car cyclist here to stir up shit.
Move along. Nothing to see here.
>>17084341
>No car
But thats wrong you autist
>>17084358
A truck isn't a car last time I checked.
>>17084389
They are basically the same anyay
>>17084328
>uglier
only the Centrifugal type is ugly, just like a turbo setup can be ugly if done badly. A Roots or Screw type can be just as nice looking as a Twin Turbo longitudinal V6
>>17084328
>>17084337
Really small turbos
>>17084328
I want a big late '60s land yacht with a giant 8-71 blower sticking through the hood.
>>17084402
No
Already solved.
>>17084328
>No mention of Turbo-compounds
>>17084328
>Awful noise
Subjective, a lot of people live supercharger whine
>Less reliable
Not always true. Especially in the aftermarket supercharger kits are known to have less issues than turbo kits
>Worse not
True but if you're turboing or supercharging your car, are you really that concerned about mpgs?
>Less power
Less PEAK power. Often times you actually gain more area under the curve which means more usable power, especially down low.
>Uglier
Subjective but I think turbo setups are ugly as hell with crazy piping going everywhere. Supercharger setups whether centrifugal or roots-type are normally very clean and simple.
I love turbos, don't get me wrong. But one isn't always better than the other. The true Master race is with TWINCHARGING.