/o/ get off your high horse and drive a reliable newer model

>>17051745
I think you misunderstood.

You bought one and yet have not STFU, so please remedy that.

>>17051745
I own acreage.
It would cost more to pave my driveway than it did to build that apartment you're renting.
I'd have to park the civic next to the road and walk a mile to my house.
Whereas i can park a bronco/forester/Tacoma/jeep/ in my garage to unload grocery's.
Enjoy your plebian existence, I'll enjoy living.

>>17051745
But my older car is already paid off, regularly maintained, and fixed before shit broke so it's reliable af. Why should I go into debt for a slower, worse handling shitbox whose only advantage is being newer?

File: lqb.jpg (25KB, 366x360px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 366x360px

>>17051745

>>17052953
I wish I was joking

But they look like shiiiiit, anon.

>>17051745
No. No thank you.

>>17053531
But your bank account won't

>>17051745
Why when I drive a cheap, reliable, older Ranger? For the money I'd lose buying a new vehicle as a commuter, it'd have to have amazing gas mileage to make the trade worth it.

>>17051745
>newer model
Reliability is not exclusive to only those