We know that the appeal of muscle cars is that they offer a good

>>16998934
Yes. If you're gonna die you might as well have fun before it happens.

>>16999031
Why did you reply to a bait thread?

>>16998934
The only Japanese car that are remotely similar to muscle/pony cars are the LC500 and the RCF.
The only European car that are similar tho ponies is the c63 and the m3 when they had naturally aspirated engines.

File: 2.png (170KB, 359x372px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 359x372px

?

>>16998934
>is it really worth it to compromise your safety?
what compromise?
http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/chevrolet/camaro-2-door-coupe

>>16998934
pretty sure safety tests are fear mongering bs
and GGnore if your 5 star ever catches fire

File: 20170125_114734.png (1MB, 1440x1159px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x1159px

Really makes you think

File: Togomk2.jpg (853KB, 1742x1307px) Image search: [Google]

853KB, 1742x1307px

>>16999320
amen to that

>>16999370
>>16999320
>>16999305
>>16999304
>>16999296
>>16999271
Who didn't sage?

>>16998934
I am having a hard time here, what car is that?

>>16999490
Meant to reply to this
>>16999296

I don't give a fuck about my safety as long as the car isn't spontaneously bursting into flames.

>>16999504
W202 Mercedes C Class

>>16998934
>2/5

Dam, they really don't care anymore.

>>16998934
WHY is Ford so shit?

>Gets passed by Tesla in market capitalization
>Their 2017 model is a death trap

>>16998934
My 2005 Ford has dual stage airbag inflation based on where your seat is positioned. Tall bastards have their seat further back thus initiating stage 2 full inflation

Somewhere along the way, they lost theirs

>>16999516
>>16999965
>>17000061
>>17001430
Car lost points for no "crash avoidance" bs, airbag not fully deploying, too long of a delay for seat belts to tension. I assume Ford did not design it that way, and are working to fix/have fixed whatever assembly/design issues caused those problems. You're gonna be fine in the front seats. Forehead might be bruised, but fine.

I drive a new edge mustang and I could give less of a fuck about the shitty cheaply made interior. Shit is fun as hell to do pulls in and sounds good with long tubes x pipe and borla ataks.

>>16999031
This guy knows

>>16999403
>>16999081
shut the fuck up

File: 129791361374.png (295KB, 385x383px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 385x383px

>>16998934
>BUT is it really worth it to compromise your safety?

Yes, and the fact that you would rather prefer some yuro or jap shitbox makes you either a ricer or a faggot.

>>17000061
>Gets passed by Tesla

LMAO, it is true

>>16998934
>2 stars

Literally less safe than a Twingo

Lost points because car didnt have autobraking and lane detection.

Aka euro wants nanny bullshit.

>>16998934
Considering that it'll understeer into a tree the instant you find a corner, I'd rather just have a hot hatch.

>>17004192
>hot hatch
These words are pure cancer

>>17004230
Better than 'american muscle car'. Enjoying the knowledge that if that soccer mom tailgating you doesn't brake, she'll kill you?

>>17005547
Why did you bump this?

>>17005547
>oh lol anon I don't have to brake because my car does it for me
This is your future. Also Muslims

>>17005569
Pancaking against a wall is your future, americunt. You can't brake, you can't corner, you can't survive a crash, and nor can the person coming the other way.

>>16998934
>is it really worth it to compromise your safety?

No

>>17004131
Also with a shittier interior

>>16998934

My current shitbox probably has a -2 star rating so I really don't give a fuck. If you crash using even half of a muscle cars power you're going to be in a world of deep shit. Even the average crossover weighs more than a modern muscle car so you're going to be fucked if one of those plow into you at 90mph regardless of the safety rating.