Hey guise, so, the new Ford Raptor only comes with a twin turbo

>>16952855
>MUH V8

next gen mustang gt will be v6 turbo mark my words

File: muh_matching_numbers.jpg (49KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 400x400px

>>16952859

MUH V8 IS A MODERN CLASSIC RARE

DONT TOUCH MUH V8 BOY

YOU CAN RIP MUH V8 FROM MY COLD DEAD FINGERS BOY

>>16952860

How long until the mustang is a KERS hybrid sportscar with a turbo v6?

Because it's fucking huge and heavy and expensive while the V8 is much smaller and cheaper and reliable and just as powerful and efficient
The real question is why they put the V6 in the raptor

>>16952882

MUH

>>16952882
MUH V8

because it would be a direct competitor to GTR and would wreck the shit out of it for a fraction of price which would sink nissan retards into ground from butthurt

also MUH

Lol v6 TT fags. Why not quad turbo 2 cylinders?

>>16952855
Do raptors ever leave parking lots? I have literally never seen one on a trail.

Boomers need the big 5 . 0 badge on the side

>>16953342
They don't
They're pretty boy trucks

>>16953342
it's not even marketed as a trail crawler it's supposed to be a monster energy baja racer

>>16953788
And the people who own them never let them see dirt

>>16953805
false
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKQdlXvbWSU

>>16952855

It's not considered a commerical truck. It's just over 6 6 or 2032 mm so has to have clearance lights.

I just wanted to point this out, and tell you I don't like you, op.
Get your shit straight.

>>16953813
>MUH TRUK

The real life mileage on that thing is going to be horrible.

>>16952855

why the fuck would I want a tarbo when I can have a glorious naturally aspirated American V8?

>>16954593

Oh come on, Ford switching to the TT6 gained 1mpg.

13mpg, babay!

>>16955698
>let's ignore the fact that it makes 510 lb ft of torque

>>16955714
that's right because torque wins races

>>16955727
which is why no one can hope to compete with the raptor

ford>gm

File: cancer.jpg (142KB, 1024x680px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1024x680px

>>16955698
both the raptor and ford gt engines are marketing gimmicks to make EcoBoost® more palatable to american consumers as the mpg regulations inevitably force classics to adopt smaller displacement turbos.

>>16955714

So does the ancient GM 6.0 V8 with a tune.

>even considering mpg's when shopping for a truck

Sure you didn't get lost on the way to the crossover/minivan section of the lot? That sounds a lot more fitting for "your type".

>>16955762
>gm v8
Has to be modified and won't pass emissions. Try again.

>no! mpg only matters when i say it does!
sperg harder pushcuck

>>16955768

You should really be reconsidering your life choices if you live in a cuckhole with emission testing. A truck should be pretty low on that list.

>>16955776
>pushcuck sperging this hard
OHC>pushrods.

daily reminder that an ohc ford engine holds the world record for fastest standing mile time. stay triggered pushcuck

>>16952855
A Ford Raptor with an Inline-4 would be a dream come true. Less weight, more speed.

File: 1443247978879.png (173KB, 329x290px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 329x290px

>>16954127

https://youtu.be/vUUPPzPxVEM?t=2m14s

File: ford-transit-van-to-offer-twin-turbo-ecoboost-v-6-engine-photo-444686-s-450x274.jpg (19KB, 450x274px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 450x274px

>wow anon, thats a cool truck. what kinda motor you got in there?
>ts ford's latest 3.5L twin turbo ecoboost. kinda a big deal
>oh....isnt that the same engine they use in their plumbers vans?
>lol no way. just look at the raptor. this thing is a TANK. its a premium truck.
>no im pretty sure they just retuned the same engine that sells in $17k plumbers vans to give you an extra 100 horsepower
>ITS A PREMIUM TRUCK THEY WOULDNT DO THAT TO ME. I PAID $60K FOR THIS THING WTF

lol raptor owners btfo

File: vlcsnap-2016-09-18-18h04m10s136.png (969KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

969KB, 1280x720px

>>16955768
>passing emissons
>emisson tests in trumps america

u wot?

>>16955793
lel

File: 1459398851056.jpg (47KB, 433x419px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 433x419px

>>16955793
>gm can't compete with a 400k dollar car powered by a fucking plumber van
BWAHAHHAHAHAHAA
>>16955799
Stay btfo

File: vlcsnap-2016-09-08-22h03m39s108.png (698KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

698KB, 1280x720px

>>16955803
http://www.thedrive.com/news/8091/trump-expected-to-roll-back-pollution-vehicle-emissions-rules

yeah im really btfo here...

File: Craptor.png (1MB, 1451x853px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1451x853px

>>16955792
>Ford Raptor
>65k


But but but but but but but, I can get for over a $1,000 less than that without every single goodie goodies, right?

>>16955822
>pushcuck talking to himself
lel

File: _68423746_mmmotwebberint.png (307KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 640x360px

>>16955793

That's one badass plumber's van, m8.

File: 1395718225561.png (437KB, 512x384px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 512x384px

>>16955810
>gm fangirls couldn't defend this
gm BTFO by a fucking van

LMAO

>>16955994
It actually is pretty cool. I've been completely fascinated by it for a while now although no one else seems to think so. If you ever see one on the road that is going slow, just know that the driver is a complete pussy. I fell for the le commercial van is big therefore it must be slow meme which isn't true at all

>>16955789

Fingers crossed for the 2.3T in the Ranger/ Bronco.

>>16956347

Wonder if they can crack 30mpg with that engine.

File: coyote.jpg (206KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 1600x1200px

Raptors are aesthetically pleasing but this fucking TT V6 nonsense is getting under my skin.

Snatch your V8's while they exist, because by the looks of where we're heading it won't for very long. Hopefully Trump (despite how much I hate him) will at the very least slow that process down. I know it may seem childish, but the sound and torque of motors like picrelated is something I don't think I can ever give up in a personal car.

>>16956429

>My

>>16955793
You're doing it wrong.

>not buying the VAN and saying "Yeah it's got the same engine as the Raptor, twin turbos."
>not getting a badass mural on the side
>not smoking corvettes at the stoplight
Dude you're thinking about this in completely the wrong way, I'm telling you.

>>16955793
tfw bought a transit 250 the other day but it was the 2.7l v6 not the 3.5 ecoboost

oh well. im still makin 300/300 at the wheels

>>16955754
>mpg regulations
Not anymore thanks to the commander and cheif.

File: 1467192527471.jpg (291KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 1280x960px

>>16956503
They still are in effect dumbfuck

>republicans are this stupid

>muh v6

>>16956429
>muh feels
Fuck off retarded baby boomer
V6 is superior deal with it

>>16957835
MUH V8
>>16957835
this

>>16955793
sorry to ruin your fun, you colossal retard, but the 2017 F150 3.5L Ecoboost is a completely redesigned engine with nothing in common with the first gen Ecoboost. try again.

>>16952855
F/I means more heat, more space taken up, and the Coyote can easily hit 450hp with a tune anyway while still being N/A, why not use it?

>>16953813
well thats probably a write off, kek what a fucking moron

>>16958406
>450hp with a tune
not in an F150.

MY VEE EIGHT

>>16956092
Most are just the NA 3.7 I drive one for work

>Tfw I tried to talk then into a 3.5 Ecoboost or even the 5cyl diesel just to make work interesting. Hell I liked the Chevy 3500 Van with the giant vortec 6.xx L that thing was a bear

>>16953331
It's lack the GT-R's advanced AWD system though.

Question: why doesn't any ponycar manufacturer offer AWD on their top trim levels?

>>16955784
>daily reminder that an ohc ford engine holds the world record for fastest standing mile time.
That's because it takes a full mile to get a heavily modified ford up to 290 mph. Meanwhile, a heavily modified pushrod Hemi does 300mph after 1000 feet. They literally had to shorten Top Fuel tracks to keep the trap speeds in check.

>>16956347
A stripper 300hp Ranger would be nice.

>>16956447
Even though I dislike Ford's move to the V6, think of it this way:
You can now get a detuned XJ220 Transit, off the dealership floor, with a warranty, for a fraction of the original's price.

>>16957884

>being this delusional

oh honey....

>>16958831
lol, then the pushrod piece of shit breaks down immediately after.
LMAO

awd TT v6 mustang when
they already killed it with the flat crank

>>16956515
>still in effect
Yes they are, but the question is for how much longer.

>>16958884
stay mad sweetie

>>16958805
don't know if I'd want a 6.0 or ecomeme desu. our e350 is sketchy as absolute fuck around the corners. very topheavy imo. definitely rollover risk.

File: 1464542511103.webm (3MB, 808x624px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 808x624px

>>16961121
Drumpf is failing at everything he attempts so don't get your hopes up

Alphonse you dumb nigger

File: Joel-SSR.jpg (149KB, 1024x579px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1024x579px

You can pry my V8 from my cold dead fingers.

Pic related. It's me and my ride.

>>16964939
drumfkins on suicide watch

>>16965097
Fuckin aussies and their goofy ass utes

>>16953335
You're a retard for not understanding why V engines are twin turbo almost universally.

>>16966317

I could be wrong, but I seem to remember those being sold in NA desu...

>>16966410
It was a joke. It just looks like a ute

>>16952860
Trump's repealing CAFE, and the Mustang is so dependent on Boomer love, I have a feeling Ford was going this direction, but won't now to compete with Chevy and Dodge, assuming they're still around by the time they can roll out the next Challenger.

>>16967684
>Republicans are this stupid

>>16952855
Its a pretty boy truck

File: 1488753995218.jpg (21KB, 280x200px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 280x200px

>>16952855

A V6 mustang that smokes the dog engine and gets over 30mpg? Can't be having that!

They should turbo the coyote

File: conan-the-destroyer.jpg (76KB, 630x458px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 630x458px

>>16952855
>gets like 20 miles per gallon

Still more than the """Eco"""boost in the GT.

File: IMG_9779.jpg (345KB, 460x594px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 460x594px

>>16953331
Kek ford cant wreck anything except crowds
Enjoy your shitty "joint venture" tech and stolen designs

>>16969048
stay btfo

>>16952882
MUH

>slower than a fucking 25+ year old GMC truck and SUV powered by a pushrod v6

>Syclone: 0-60 in 4.3 seconds with 13 seconds to quarter
>Ford Craptor 0-60 in 5.1 seconds with 13.8 in the quarter

Cant make this shit up. Ford keks on suicide watch by 90s GM

>>16969819
>still inferior offroad
stay btfo. lmao

File: Quot+asian+quot+_a6cfd3a95b00c547fc480bcb84c6f071.jpg (54KB, 800x804px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 800x804px

>>16969823
>S L O W E R

top jej. Faster than anything made by ford at the time
>took ford 25 years to build a truck that still cant compete with a pushrod v6 truck

>>16969825
>slower
yes your push shit truck is slower offroad. the only relevant performance metric for an offroad truck.

File: 1458186124097.jpg (22KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 480x360px

>>16969827
HE CANT COMPETE ON ROAD

TOP FUCKING KEK. Tell ford to hurry up and build a truck that can compete
>The lightning couldnt even do it

Ford confirmed shit
GM are mad men building the fastest accelerating vehicle in the 90s

Why can't ford compete?

>>16969833
>literally admits gm can't compete at all
lmao. reminder that gm can't beat the raptor offroad or around a track

File: 1462906315852.jpg (24KB, 480x516px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 480x516px

>>16969835
>add shocks and tires on syclone
>still smokes craptor

Why can't ford compete 25 years later?
>literally cant build a pavement truck either
>so assmad he needs to bring up modern ford products that still cant compete

File: 1455069648000.jpg (121KB, 948x717px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 948x717px

>>16969847
Your delusions aren't reality. The Raptor is unparalleled offroad.

>gm fag so desperate he brings up modified vehicles
lmao

reminder that the fastest vehicle in the 90s was the ford rs200 with a 0-60 time of 3.0 flat. reminder that push shit can't compete with ohc.

>>16952869
>>16952859
they have a turbo 4-cylinder though

my guess is theyre too busy working on a turbo'd V8 for now, theyll probably get to it eventually

>>16969857
>Durr modified
>brings up a car specifically built for racing
>only built 200. Costing over 100k
>0-60 in 3.8 seconds
>444hp vs 280hp
>near half the weight
>barely faster than a FUCKING PICK UP TRUCK
Ford should just end their life here
>GMC syclone built for asspain. 26k for one and smoking literally everything

Ford cant even compete. Heres a list
>faster than a gt350
>faster than mustang GT
>Faster than focus RS
>faster than raptor

Raptor has 1 more turbo and nearly 2 times the horsepower and is slower. Is ford retarded or sumthin?
>literally the only ford product that can beat a 10k rustbucket is a 400k supercar

Daily reminder ford cant compete.

File: 1484984080463.jpg (57KB, 600x540px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 600x540px

>>16969874
>p-please let me include my modified vehicles
nope. sperg harder
>still slower than a Raptor offroad
lmao. how can gm compete?

daily reminder that gm's 10k rustbucket gets btfo by a overpriced turbocharged dyson vacuum cleaner with a body kit. LMAO. YOU LITERALLY CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP!

File: 1471582609250.jpg (24KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 320x320px

>>16969874
WAIT A SECOND. EVEN THE ROAD GOING RS200 WAS SLOWER THAN A SYCLONE
>horsepower limited to 250 on road legal versions
>Racing version had 450hp and was barely faster

YOU CANT MAKE THIS SHIT UP

>>16969877
See>>16969874
and>>16969878

And stay btfo. Ford cant compete with a 25 year old truck

>>16969878
>gm fangirls now blatantly lying
reminder that gm's 10k rustbucket gets btfo by a overpriced turbocharged dyson vacuum cleaner

File: 1458110091567.png (763KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

763KB, 800x800px

>>16969880
Literally slower than an overpriced vacuum cleaner. LMAO. GM BTFO.

File: 1460245788437.png (148KB, 222x293px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 222x293px

>>16969881
>>16969882
>pushrod v6 that was thrown into every GM product with 1 turbo smokes all ford "performance" models of the past and modern day.

Really fires up the neurons doesnt it?

>>16969889
>gm fangirls believe this

>not waiting for 2018 when the F150 gets diesel

File: 1453533619000.jpg (36KB, 400x460px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 400x460px

>>16969898
>he doesn't look at the facts

Being this delusional because a 25 year old gm v6 4.3 pushrod (which was first introduced in 1985) single turbo minitruck demolishes all modern ford products.

Ford on suicide watch.

>>16969906
>a 25 year old gm v6 pushrod minitruck demolishes all modern ford products
except it doesn't.

>gm fangirls this delusional

File: 1465776289767.jpg (22KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 400x400px

>>16969908
>faster than a gt350 - 4.3 seconds
>faster than a mustang GT - 4.5 seconds
>faster than the raptor - 5.1 seconds
>faster than the Focus RS - 4.7 seconds
>faster than the fusion "sport" - kek

all via ford's website :^)

Syclone - 4.3 seconds with less power and a v6 2 valve pushord with 1 count it 1 turbo.

sad!

>>16969912
>Ford Shelby GT500: 0-60 in 3.5 seconds
>gm fangirls actually this retarded
pushcucks on suicide watch

>>16967684
Just like he repealed obamacare right guise

File: 1460607249222.jpg (8KB, 268x284px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 268x284px

>>16969916
>needs 662 hp and a special division to beat a 25 year old v6 pushrod built by a pickup division.
>barely faster than a long ratio 4 speed automajic

Gee whiz ford is garbage. They cant even compete with a GM minitruck.

>>16969933
>gets btfo
>b-but
pushcucks are actually this desperate lmao

>>16969935
>Needs 3 times the horspower and a muscle car to beat a truck by .7 seconds

This much asspain. kek
Ford """""performance"""""

>>16969937
>admits push shit can't keep up
lmao

>>16969944
>25 year old truck can keep up with a car that has 3 times the power

So why cant modern ford products do it? Why is ford so shit? They cant compete with a pushrod 4.3 v6 2 valve with 1 turbo?

Answer: No they cant.

>>16969950
>why is ford so shit
they seem to be doing fine considering they're faster than your beloved push shit truck. lmao. sperg harder

>>16969954
>2017 """"""performance"""""" models cant compete with a 25 year old pushrod v6

I think ford is retarded at this point.

>>16969962
>gm can't compete with the v6 gt or a gt500
lol gm fangirls on suicide watch

>>16969963
>Needing 3 times the horsepower, 25 years, and a 400k supercar to beat a pushrod single turbo minitruck

Yup ford is retarded. Thanks for confirmation

>>16952869
The filename cracked me up. Fucking boomers man.

>>16969967
>admits gm can't compete
btfo

5vt7hc8

>>16964939
Must know her name

>>16973341
Check the metadata.

File: 1491245124241.png (119KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 400x400px

>>16955824
>$53,720

fuck all the other features, this will do

lol v8 fags get so butthurt about this engine