First pics since overhauling the suspension. Lowered it

File: IMG_1961.jpg (807KB, 2048x1536px)

807KB, 2048x1536px

Original height for reference.

>>16949526
is that 2009? also do you conefag/track day?

File: IMG_5872.jpg (368KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 1200x1600px

If anything I like the color. Not a fan of super low cars.

>>16949595
I wouldn't feel comfortable leaving that car outside in that sort of area, where from?

>>16949526
you really need some aftermarket wheels now

>>16949549
>trailing arm
wtf?

>>16949620
Hayward

>>16949587
It's a 2010. Im not aware of any real tracks in the Richmond area, BUT there are plenty of twists and turns. So I've hit those pretty hard since It's been done

>>16949642
I'm stuck between that and a new driveshaft as next on the list. I've had these tires less than a year so I'd be sticking at 17 inch wheels

>>16949647
Panhard rod and an upper panhard support.

File: 5756554b89651b287d9a77d7f9356e455cfee5933deed44683499e680599a402.jpg (57KB, 859x1267px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 859x1267px

>>16949680
sorry to hear that
must suck being surrounded by din dos all the time

File: IMG_1732.jpg (568KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

568KB, 1920x1080px

>>16949595
It's honestly not that low. The black one is even lower. You definitely wouldn't like that one then, it's around 3.5 inches

>>16949715
The issue is finding wheels that actually look nice and shave a bit of weight off at the same time. They don't make too many lightweight wheels for Mustangs.