We can all agree this is how engines should be right? >1.5L

Autism

>>16947008
So torqueless?
No thanks.
Ill take a v8 with 400 hp but unless its FI 4L aint enough discplacement.

Summer is here!

File: 51NTd-pSSfL.jpg (38KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 500x500px

Every engine should be turbocharged and make twice as much power.

>>16947008
But what If I want torque or fuel economy. If we are talking NA, those are some pretty highly strung engines

>>16947008
This is the fucking future, I'd expect no less than 500 from a big ol' V8 and 800 HP from a V12 unless they're extremely tiny.

>>16947008
>1.5L
>not 150hp
REEEEEEEEE

In all seriousness,

7.0L V8 is where it's at.
427 cube small blocks are the bee's knees.

>busfags think horsepower with no other variable is relevant

what good is horsepower if the friction from weight can slow your rotor?

And you didn't even post the cylinder geometry of the 6... just a bad thread made by an ignorant man.

weak af
even gookshit is getting 300hp from 2.0L now

>>16947087

Measuring engine torque is about as useful as measuring rpm

>Ah yes with the right gearing my 130hp Inline 4 can make as much torque as a v8

>>16947099
>300hp from 2.0L
anything anywhere could do that with forced induction and I've never seen a 300 HP NA production 2 liter in my life.

>>16947008
with 6L N/A V12 you can make way more than 600 HP

>>16947037
That's a supercharger you fucking retard

>>16947257
>he dosent know about E-turbochargers

gb2 leddit, newfag

>>16947209
Where does it say NA anywhere in the OP

>>16947102
And go slower as you've geared down so much more then the v8 that you have little to no usable wheel hp.

>>16947435
Off the line is the only thing that matters

>>16947507
Doesn't matter, v8 wins there too.

>>16947257
>>16947268
you're both wrong, it's a megahyper, like a turbo & supercharger but you fill it with apple seeds and put it on the hub carriers

Where the fuck is your TT I6

>>16947524
nope

>>16947008
>waow what is this cool rare toyota i havent seen
before
wtf i love toyota now

>>16947507
Yeah bud, you still need horsepower to move, which the v8 has more of because it's not had to be geared down.

>>16947554
Sweetheart, I have a 60hp 4 cylinder with low gears and a v8 with relatively tall gears. By the time the 4cyl is geared on par with the v8, the 4cyls top speed is something like 3mph. V8 hands down.

>>16947691
did i fucking say it would win a 1/4 mile drag cunt? no i fucking said it would jump ahead at the line and immediately hit top speed and then lose

>>16948485
So basically what you're saying is a 4cyl geared down is gonna Rev to 6000rpm (3mph) in a faster time span then it takes a v8 to get to 1000rpm (3mph)

Does.
Not.
Happen.

It's not going to jump ahead at all because it
Has.
Less.
Power.

>>16948830
So now you are saying horsepower is all that matters? Lmao

>>16947008
I got a I3 1.0 about 100
Scrub

>>16947037
That's an alternator you retard

>>16947691
Is this Alphonse? Why are you such a faggot dude

>>16947008
Yes, only idiots would say differently. There is good reason for 500cc/cly and 75-100hp/l to have become the standard.

>>16947043
>But what If I want torque or fuel economy.
Then buy German or Japanese.

>If we are talking NA, those are some pretty highly strung engines
Only if you are living in the '90s.

>>16947008
your scale is off, it should be:
>1.0l 2 Cylinder - 100HP
>1.5l 3 Cylinder - 150HP
>2.0l 4 Cylinder - 200HP

>>16949295
>>16949303
piss off newcunt