>tfw no 1650HP carbon fiber Dodge Charger with a 9L twin-turbo V8 from a boat
>and it still can't turn
>>16938857
>tfw no barn find Model A to put around town in
>they knew it was a barge so they put a boat engine in it
kek
a lot of money to make an ugly car
>>16938849
>chrome nigger wheels and no sidewall
every time. muscle car faggots are the worst
>>16938849
>SpeedKore-Performance
>Engine Specs:
>All this power doesn’t come cheap however, as
>the 90-degree 9.0L DOHC V-8 aluminum block
>(with dual-overhead cam heads
>Designed/Developed/Produced by Mercury
>Racing) is estimated to cost $65,000.
65k I assume for the lower output motor, that motor is the top of the line one.
Though I'm not to impressed that a company bought a crate motor and slapped it into a car.
>>16938849
>tfw can't turn
>>16938849
at least post a decent resolution
>>16938873
*Foose muscle car faggots are the worst
>>16938849
Yet another charger ruined by that retarded pro touring styling
I hate those LED lights.
The hood and wheels are repulsive too.
>>16938860
Shouldn't those puzzle pieces be weird shaped and unable to fit together?
Or is that the family crest of the typical Taiwanese paper mache fetishist?
>>16938849
It can't put that power down, it's just dick waving
>>16939577
345 tires at the rear which is worth something
>>16939677
needs to be fully tubbed with an ocean of rubber to be able to put 1650 down on the ground
>>16939501
This, protouring fags are the worst.
People were able to daily these things with 14 inch wheels and 4 wheel drums.
>>16939707
kek no
there are 2000+hp cars that can hook up on 275s
its all about compound and setup
>>16939892
and drive like complete shit
and handle like complete shit
and stop like complete shit
>>16939934
>and drive like complete shit
>and handle like complete shit
>and stop like complete shit
I'll take that over some nigger rims and ebay disc brakes.
Muscle cars are ugly as shit with modern looks, i dunno why.
>>16939577
Exactly, Jay Leno drove it and said anything past half throttle and you loose the back end. The dumb niggers who built this should have put that engine in something aerodynamic and nice enough to actually put that power on the ground.
>>16939938
I dont like the look either but I realize that sticking with 14s and 15s are shit compared to larger wheels in this day and age and some people want well performing muscle cars
I also dislike modern engine swaps and any kind of restomodding but whatevs
>>16939944
1600hp is unstreetable
This car is engineered to do 220 mph easily and then not just losing control but flying 20 feet in the air and then disintegrating upon impact.
It's the car Paul Walker should have died in.
>>16939677
A proper 10.5 slick would put down more power than any low profile garbage
>>16939950
How come NASCAR can run 200mph on 15s?
TTing that engine is retarded. As soon as the turbos spool up it will break traction.
Could've been done for $20k with a Chrysler RB block. Engineering failure.
>>16940324
you can run 200 mph on 12s if you wanted to
what is gearing power and aerodynamics
The engine is going to be making over 800HP by itself. Why add weight, hurt the balance, and create unusable power by throwing in twin turbos? It'd be a lot lighter and be able to put power down without them.
Also, the wheels need to be dropped 2" in size each.
>>16942141
Twin turbo big block V8's have smooth powerbands. It's not like a 4 banger on 50lbs from a 80mm single where you make nothing till 8k rpm.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPTNOvvvM7g
>>16942163
Because it's 2017 and 800hp is fucking boring.
>>16942172
94mm turbos are enormous even on a V8. Jay Leno said it himself: going past half throttle at almost any speed just creates smoke.
Those wheels are so shit