Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
File: 2017-Bugatti-Chiron-rear-end.jpg (1023KB, 2048x1360px) Image search:
[Google]
1023KB, 2048x1360px
I think Bugatti might have forgotten to style the rear of the Chiron. The front looks incredible but the rear looks so.... plain, generic, nonexistent.
>literally a rounded rectangle
>honeycomb mesh shaped after the intake of a damn harrier
>exhaust outlet is a fucking square / pentagon, my sides
>logo is on a slanted surface lmao
>license plate holder clearly made for European and not American plates
>ok diffuser
>literally a single led strip
How do you justify $3 million for something that is so laughable?
>>
>>16925997
well I clicked the thread cause I thought it was badass and tronmode but your faggy content betrays my expectations
>>
>>16925997
>how do you justify 3 million
I'm not sure, maybe the W16 quad turbo motor? I don't know why anyone posts about this car anymore it's just a very fast turd.
>>
>rear end looks like a cylon
>chiron
>cylon
Hmm
>>
I think it looks pretty good, especially with the wing
>>
>>16925997
>"Make me a rear end for the new Bugatti that will sufficiently vent all of the heat that that engine is going to put out."
>"Okay."
And thus we arrive here.
>>
>>16925997
i suppose you hate women just as much, as you'll never get one of those either, right?
>>
>>16925997
I personally think its hideous as well, but it was pretty clear they wanted to give it a minimalist vibe. Same way with the interior.
>>
>>16926011
damn that's sick.
>>
File: Bugatti-Chiron-front-three-quarter-IAB-Rendering.jpg (187KB, 1600x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
187KB, 1600x1200px
>>16925997
You got it backwards. The front looks like shit. Holy fuck.
>>
File: 2016_lamborghini_aventador_lp750-4_superveloce_3_1920x1080.jpg (674KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
674KB, 1920x1080px
>>16926012
Because the Chiron is the only car in existence to have a large motor in the rear and need substantial venting
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4