what do guys think of the buick grand national? legend or loser?

legendary loser

File: WHEELSFALLOFF.jpg (76KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1280x720px

>>16840377
LEGEND
E
G
E
N
D

>>16840383
0-60 in about 5 secs. in 1987.. stock

File: maxresdefault[1].jpg (186KB, 1500x844px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1500x844px

True legend here

>>16840537
explain.

>>16840429
I don't believe that for a second.

its a legend objectively Id say

its a loser because 3800 granpa car

>>16840537
those are cooler but still lol3800

theyre not really well known enough to be a legend imo

>>16840595
the Trans Am Turbo could do mid 4s

Legend

But


Too pricey these days.
If you buy one...you wont put miles on it.

File: 1472927584113.png (232KB, 511x296px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 511x296px

>>16840603
>Trans Am Turbo could do mid 4s
>Trans Am Turbo
This shit is NEWS to me.

>>16840603
Do you have a source for the 5-second thing? That seems unreasonably fast. I'd expect mid-6 or 7.

Fast as fuck accerlation for the time, but shitty 80s GM quality.


>>16840603
The GN could supposedly do mid 4s too, but I don't believe either. For comparison a fourth gen z28 with more horsepower only does mid 5s.

>>16840603
>3800
nah the 3.8 in the Grand National is not the 3800 in your grandma's grand prix

>>16840537
GTA trans ams are reliable if anything. That 305 Chevy was slow as balls but never broke on me. I drove from college to home from Kentucky to Michigan every two weekends and never broke down once.
Speed no, quality build yes

>>16840595
https://youtu.be/1WYOAib_GGA
at about 1:10

>>16840647
https://youtu.be/1WYOAib_GGA
watch from 1:10

>>16840806
>>16840811
People have told me that the GNX was just an appearance package alone and added nothing performance-wise or regarding suspension.

Did they just not know what the hell they were talking about?

>>16840819
larger turbo, ported heads, exhaust.. increased HP by 50.. worth 100k now cause limited numbers. while regular GN is about 30k now

>>16840819
you are getting Grand National and GNX mixed up

>>16840700
I think those used the same motor as the GN or GNX.. I think it's the 20th anniversary Trans Am Pace car. Idk but i'm sure that some special turd gen TA got the same motor as a GN

>>16840595
This story you're telling me, it's macabre!

>>16840700
That's not a 305.

>>16840819

They had a torque arm rear suspension instead of a 4 link and made considerably more power. They were all sold as hardtops only due to excessive chassis flex on the T-top bodies. There's a reason they command 50k+

File: IMG_2329.jpg (3MB, 2592x1728px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2592x1728px

>>16840834
I'm glad people think my car is worth 30k because I paid less than 15 for it.

File: 7864114306_eec39d5c47_z.jpg (167KB, 640x403px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 640x403px

>>16840537
That's a good one. I submit the following