> buy a rav4 1995 model > get immediate shit from

File: 1474857378967.jpg (69KB, 419x610px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 419x610px

>being friends with normalfags

>>16829144
you did good, your friends are faggots

>>16829144
>do the same
>friends like it

sorry brah, looks like your friends have bad taste in cars

>>16829144
At least its not a purple 2 door.
p gay tho

>>16829194
not being into rare colorway

KYS

File: 8483191.png (25KB, 500x461px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x461px

>>16829144
The 123hp 2wd version or 150 hp 4 wheel drive version?

Either way, they are probably laughing cause its literally a japanese shit box with an suv package tacked on to it.

>>16829144
Probably because you're single and poor?

>>16829975
I have 2004 version with awd (I think) and 150hp.
Girls thinks its cute, police dont give it a second glance but holy shit does this motherfucker grip even on snow and ice.
Body roll is hilarious too.
Seriously rav4´s are great goddamn cars as long as you dont have an automatic. Theyre less of an suv and more like an oversized, overweight hatchback

File: image.jpg (140KB, 768x512px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 768x512px

>>16829144
Because it's not a superior first gen Honda CR-V witha GS-R head swap...

File: image.jpg (149KB, 800x535px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 800x535px

>>16830640

>>16830640
>worse in every way
>superior
Ok

>>16830640
>>16830645
>CR-V

Oh man you're actually serious lmao

>>16830640
>>16829144

These things were equivalent to CuckUVs back in the day.

Compared to the shit we get now they are pretty good but compared to vehicles in their era it's like buying a Ridgeline to pretend you're a farmer

File: TCRvTka.jpg (233KB, 2398x1226px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 2398x1226px

>>16829144
just make sure you can get the blood out

File: 354deaa3770912621bb816da070346ab.jpg (12KB, 258x245px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 258x245px

>he bought a 22 year old car

>>16829144
Because it's an ugly 22 year old car?

>>16829144
never been in one but I always liked the looks of the early rav4's. they look like they would be a blast with awd and a custom longtravel kit. 12" of travel with ifs/irs and awd would be fun as fuck inna desert, would run circles around my tacoma.

File: Toytoa-Rav4-1996-10.jpg (84KB, 1140x643px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1140x643px

>>16831309
It'll outlast whatever you drive

>>16831318
I don't think a 22 year old rusted Rav4 will outlast a 2010 Acura TL, but stay delusional poorfag.

>>16831329
Lol
Enjoy burning oil hondafag

>>16831338
Nice assumptions

Car hasn't had a single problem @ 100,000 miles

>>16831350
>he bought a 7 year old honda
Lol poorfag. Enjoy your fwd shitbox.

>>16831338
>>16831355
some of the lowest effort shitposting ive ever seen

>>16829144
Lmao, I just ditched my car from 94
Nice to know what kind of idiots wind up with old shitty cars like mine.

>>16831361
>assblasted
>>16831367
This is low effort

>>16831361
Ignore him, he's a depressed poorfag who bought a 22 year old car and everyone is laughing at him. That's why he came here to cry about it.

>>16830640
>not slightly modding a QSD H2B kit for an H22A/F20B swap

Ya dun goof'd

>>16829144
I bought a first gen Xterra and friends talk shit cuase they think you should only buy American cars and it's jap crap

>>16831431
Well nissan is the definition of crap

>>16831434
They were fine until they started using CVTs

>>16831454
No they werent. They are known for poor electronics, bad interior quality, cheap paint, weird design choices, weak brakes, bad suspension.
They are the worst of the jap brands and always have been.

>>16831462
That's a funny way of spelling Mitsubishi

>>16831468
They are a close second

>>16831473
You're confused friendo, Nissan cars had better paintjobs, interiors and electronics than Shitsubishi, the only engine worth a shit from them was the 6G72 and the 4G, at least in the American market, compared against the many great engines that Nissan offered

>>16831491
Im not going to argue which shitty company is better.
Both are bottom tier shit.

>>16831495
Maybe now, but Nissan before the buyout was 100x better than what it is today, they were better than Mazda with their rusting unibodys ffs

>>16831376
>this is low effort
No, those are facts. I had a car from 1994. I sold it. I bought a car that can actually last now.

No, your 22 year old car will not outlast it.

>>16831500
Lol sweet meme bro.
Nissan has never beat mazda, toyota or honda for build quality, reliability, and overall good car.

>>16831514
You're fucking dreaming if you think Nissan never beat Mazda in any of those metrics

>>16831517
I disagree

File: 1489286078428.jpg (83KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 640x640px

>>16831521
Well then you're an idiot