friendly reminder that in a few years people will be all over

>>16777594
>Honda is going to make it godlike soon
>implying it isn't already

>>16777594
you can't turbo a vtec

File: 64717d1251012739-ls-vtec-turbo-ripper-video-img_04491[1].jpg (79KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 800x600px

>>16777601
Where is your god now

>>16777601
>implying

>>16777601
Dumbest post of the day right there

Vtec has been around as long as jz and ls
Poorfag ricers have been worshipping it for years
Its shit

>>16777623
vtec is gonna make it into F1
the technology will have other manufactures lapping at hondas balls lmao

File: 1488140024583.jpg (122KB, 559x836px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 559x836px

>tfw to intelligent to have vtec

>>16777667
How fucking stupid are you?

>>16777715
what a great thread that was

>>16778033
>being THIS buttblasted about vtec being the superior tech

>>16778050
No, butt lasted that you think VTEC or any variation of variable valve timing with lift hasn't made it into F1 already, but it doesn't matter considering all F1s are turbo now anyways

>>16778289
>everyone using hondas god tech
you folks can keep paying a ton of cash on your fancy vee-ates and inlyine-sex
vtec is the future

File: lp9.jpg (150KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 720x576px

>>16778316
What about V6s with VTEC?
BTFO

File: htup_1008_03_z+j_series_engine_swaps+j32a2.jpg (406KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

406KB, 1600x1200px

>>16778322
Shit, wrong engine

>>16778327
absolutely godlike unlike fucking inlines

>>16777601
vtec is a tuyrbo you retard

>>16777609
nope that VTech turbo it's different from stock VTech. you have to buy a modified VTech system.

>>16778667
it's more like a supercharger

would you connect a turbo to a turbo

I'm not gonna lie I have a 2011 328i and maybe it's just shitty modern BMW but the turbo lag makes it not as much fun to enjoy on the street as I'd like. You don't get the power to just go right off the bad like you'd want to, and once the RPMs get to 6k I start wincing at how much the engine seems like it's working. I wouldn't mind VTEC over a turbocharger on a DD (cuz i'd rather have NA for weekend/track car).

>>16777594
>not swapping a Civic's I4 for a Z30A and then twincharging it
>not wanting to explode

>>16778989
lmao what the fuck are you talking about

File: twin turbo.jpg (775KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

775KB, 1600x1200px

>>16778989

>would you connect a turbo to a turbo

ever hear of a twin turbo dumbass

pic related it's going on my wrx

>>16780381
I'd rather have a y connection