I can't look at this car and want it. It looks unimaginative. A lot of the styling I've seen in other cars. So why would I buy it.
the front literally looks like a wrx/benz hybrid copy paste
>>16733505
I was going to say it looks like the Volvo front. But yeah.
>>16733501
Since when did Buick finally have the balls and the spare cash to design their own car without the help from the Huns? Unless, we poor Europeans will finally get a new Opel Omega...
>>16733519
except for the fact you faggots don't get the Buick LaCrosse in any form.
atleast they didn't put a stupid clock in the center
>>16733531
>Not getting a crappy-designed "luxury" Yank land barge.
Oh, my heart bleeds...
>>16733501
>>16733505
>>16733511
>>16733563
Op here.
That looks great. It looks very bold.
>>16733504
rear looks and some of the lines look directly ripped from the chevy impala
I like it.
>>16733563
genuinely hope this makes it to production
it looks really good
>>16733886
>american concept car
if it makes it to production it will have lost all its character and look bland af
>>16733930
>design beautiful concept
>get everyone drooling over it
>gets enough interest to make it to production
>redesign it to look like dogshit
>wonder where the hype went
fucking why do car makers do this
do they all hate their customers or something
but still, you never know man, American cars have been getting better and better recently
>>16733761
well that's because Buick is owned by GMC. So that is a rebadged Impala. I believe the Chevy Cruze is rebadged as that other Buick.
>>16733946
i assume it's to meet various regulations, which i can understand, but (probably) equal blame can be put on bean counters and focus groups
like the really unique blue velvet interior of the continental concept, that would be been a halo luxury car for sure but i guess the focus groups thought blue velvet "looked old" or some shit