Which year/decade would you say planned obsolescence became common among car makers?
Not sure, fortunately there's a big difference between a 5 year old car, and a five your old phone, the five year old car is still pretty new if you consider how long cars last vs how long phones/laptops last
the wrc yaris looks cool af, i would buy one if they came with awd from the factory
>>16690289
Toyota is planning to do a wrc inspired yaris production car. The rumor says it will be about 200hp.
>>16690255
>fortunately there's a big difference between a 5 year old car, and a five your old phone
that gap is getting smaller every new model year
1920s with it really taking off in the 50s
>>16690309
source?
>>16690345
http://www.topgear.com/car-news/geneva-motor-show/toyota-making-rally-inspired-yaris-hot-hatch
>>16690345
http://www.caradvice.com.au/513502/2017-toyota-yaris-facelift-revealed-alongside-wrc-inspired-157kw-hot-hatch-here-in-march-but-no-hot-hatch-for-australia/
>However, the big news is the reveal of the new ‘high-performance’ Yaris (above), which will debut at the Geneva motor show in March.
>>16690255
>tfw 15 year old car and 12 year old phone
>>16690240
The year I always hear from people is 1995. No idea why though.
>>16690240
with the introduction of non serviceable modules
.eg life time fluid and bearings
also headlight modules as opposed to assembly's
another thing is that bumpers are integral to the bodywork now
where in the past they were cheep and sacrificial
>>16690240
Probably the 50's.
>>16690649
>bumpers are integral
Wait, what?
>>16690240
WHORE! WHORE!!!!
>>16690289
>>16690309
>>16690360
WHORES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>16690504
>>16690488
>>16691186
>notice how this thread isn't about planned obsolescence, but to promote a yaris instead? Did you catch that, geniuses?
>>16690240
Planned obsolescence isn't a thing. They do cut corners to meet profit goals and save weight but they can't/don't engineer it to fail in x amount of time.
>>16691376
>>16691385
>>16691387
Did that Reddit video about shilling spook you? I'd say Toyo shills are still way fucking better than Lincoln/Ford shills
>>16691441
>>16691441
WHORE! SOULLESS WHORE!!
>>16691453
Did I trigger you? I'm sorry I'm invading your internet safe space on 4chan.
TOYOTA= G O A T
>>16691506
You're spamming and that's out of a *complete* lack of regard because you are a WHORE. YOUR LIFE IS NOTHING BUT WHOREDOM. You know?
>>16690309
>>16690360
>>16690370
The article says it will still be fwd, so who cares. There is no reason to buy it unless it is awd.
>>16691521
>you are a WHORE. YOUR LIFE IS NOTHING BUT WHOREDOM
Who is the one really spamming here?
>>16691543
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
WHat about the topic of planned obsolescence, I thought OP was so interested in talkign about it, rather than dropping deets and teasers abotu some shit fucking WHOREYOTA...Right you scum of the earth shill?
>>16691544
WHORE WHORE A WHOREY WHORE WHORE WHORE
>>16691548
>>16691557
SPAMMER SPAMMER A SPAMY
SPAMMER SPAMMER SPAMMER
>>16691387
Basically.
>>16691544
>>16691563
wait, who's spamming again? you faggot little bitch?
>>16691574
BUY TOYOTAS BUY TOYOTAS
>>16690240
About the time Henry Ford found that people had stopped buying new Model Ts because they already had one.
>>16690327
Yes, because phones are getting more durable and batteries are getting better.
American ''''''cars'''''' get more fragile every year.
>>16690240
GM were doing it in the 50s
>>16690255
I don't know mate, I bought a samsung galaxy S1 when I was 17. I only recently replaced it with a galaxy s5. Mostly because I had the first gen S1, which did not have a flash
>>16691418
They certainly can't fucking think straight. Look at audi with that retarded RS4 V8 engine. Thinking chains are lifetime items. Look at a motorcycle's final drive chain. Sure it gets alot more abuse but it should be fairly evident that even overengineered chains will break down.
Also, Porsche's IMS bearing memery. A fucking sealed IMS bearing cannot be a lifetime item due to heat.
I'm not saying it's willfull neglect, but it seems like there is less rigorous QC analysis of components
>>16693545
>tfw nokia 6655
Only luxo brands do "planned obsolesence" but I think it is mostly to keep poor people from driving their cars used. Lux car buyers upgrade every 1 - 3 years regardless of the car's condition.
>>16690240
Mid-90's when BMW first started pushing the notion of recyclable cars over cars built to last ages.
>>16693632
Cars today last longer than ever with with less maintenance.
Cars used to be considered old if they had 100k miles. Any non luxury car built and sold today will hit 200k with basic maintenance which mostly means oil changes.
I'd say the late 80's / early 90's is when planned obsolescence got into full swing.
>>16691237
he meant they're essentially a part of the body work now. as opposed to being a seperate piece from the body entirely.
>>16691521
>>16694169
They can still be replaced easily.