So what's your 0-60 time /o/? >2007 Dodge Charger >7.7s

>>16663676
The charger is that fucking slow?

What is the purpose at this point? Just fucking end it all

>>16663676
>1995 Integra GSR
>7.1-7.3 seconds
My dashcam has pegged me at 7.2 to 60 but according to one of the drag strip regulars they should hit 7.1 with perfect everything
How does it feel OP?

>>16663686
>the charger only comes in one engine, one drive train.

>>16663699
I think he's more asking what is the point of calling it a muscle car when it's slower than a japscrap economy car with a 1.8 liter from 12 years before it?

>2008 Nissan xTerra
>~8s

>>16663686
>>16663697
I have the pussy V6, got it for $4k and the interiors like new.
Needed the backseats and it's still got some kick for a sedan

>>16663721
It would have some kick if it wasn't two fucking tons with less than 300 HP
OP your car is literally slower than a 3k civic

File: 13626349_10210507526630974_6710161858352687901_n.jpg (171KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 960x960px

>>16663721

Got my 08 SXT for $2k.

>>16663729
>those apartments
>that car
It's like pottery

File: Screenshot_20160817-180844.png (2MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x2560px

Considering my truck does the quarter in 22.9 seconds at 59.3 mph, I'm going to guess somewhere around 23 seconds.

my cx-5 does 7.7 and its a fucking family car

wtf

>>16663697
>>16663710

What is highway acceleration from 60?
What is not doing 4500rpm down the highway?

>>16663734
I'm 100% white and live in the middle of the woods. None of my neighbors were black either.

92 stang
>6.4

>>16663676
The gen 1 MS3 is pretty differed with times, some say its 5.6-6.1 seconds. But, it does 13.8-14.5 second quarter mile stock.

With all FWD cars, launching is pretty difficult so the times will be all over the place. Its really quick while rolling though. BTFO's older mustangs, hondas/acuras, and pretty much anything in that range. Mine is around 280hp tho

>>16663676

>97 volvo 855-t5 a/t (R ecu, injectors, rest oem)
>6.6 sec

>>16663758
I had an old benz 300d n/a that would have been neck and neck with that. Do you go flat out on onramps?

>>16663710
1995 GSR: Top trim sport compact from Honda's premium line, performance oriented.

2007 Dodge Coronet: Base full size family sedan from Chrysler's budget line. Fleet oriented.

when your "sports car" is .5 sec quicker than a cab.

File: 1474495787245.jpg (37KB, 634x471px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 634x471px

>>16663676
>1970 MG Midget
>14s

File: 9AkEMTE.jpg (805KB, 1200x922px) Image search: [Google]

805KB, 1200x922px

Idk like 4 flat or something. It's a 3600lb sedan with a 4 cylinder tho so what can you do.

File: IMG_20160817_174015.jpg (799KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

799KB, 1920x1080px

>>16663850
I go flatout everywhere, yet it literally is slow as fuck.

>>16663788
>stang
>buying a "stang"
>owning a "stang"

>>16663676
>2 ton Luxocar

6.2

File: 20161211_132655_2000x1125.jpg (407KB, 2000x1125px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 2000x1125px

>>16663676
3.6s

>>16663964
gay

File: _DSC4565_2000x1331.jpg (399KB, 1331x2000px) Image search: [Google]

399KB, 1331x2000px

>>16663967
>Upset
Shit that's slow compared to my old bike. Even in the 80's at 2.8s 0-60

>>16663936
inline 6?

>>16663964
>>16663999

Bikefags always brag about their 0-60 times yet in reality they'd loop the bike or spin the tire if they tried to get even remotely close the the advertised time.

>>16663676
probs around 10s.

>>16664010
>Implying it's difficult to go fast in a straight line on a motorcycle

>>16663676
2003 Nissan Xterra 3.3l it only makes 180hp
Around 11 seconds from a post I read online

>>16663710
It's not really surprising that putting a weak engine in a sedan makes it slow

But that's why you can get it with a V8

>>16663780
>4500 rpm on the highway
If you keep it in fourth
>>16663850
That doesn't answer the initial question as to why he called it a muscle car, no need to get all finicky about a 1.8 being quicker than a 3.~
>>16664115
I was just picking on him is all, I honestly like that body style of Charger the best and if I were in the market for a weekender that wasn't manual I'd pick up an SRT8 one in a heartbeat

File: image.jpg (175KB, 809x607px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 809x607px

6 seconds assuming it actually hooks. Only an El Camino could be that slow and still struggle for traction.

>>16664156
Besides, assuming you don't have a 3 inch fart can on, the drone doesn't really get noticeable until ~5000 RPM, unless you're one of those windows up music off types, in which case you picked a 2,700 lb shitbox from the 90's and deserve everything that happens to you when you complain about it not being comfy

>>16664156
People underestimate muscle cars
But given the price and weight, they have really good performance

>>16664212
I'll give ya if you're looking for just a highway commuter, but for someone like me who delivers pizza that would just guzzle more gas and be more of a burden to maneuver around apartment complexes. Different people for different things eh?

193 hp
~6.6 seconds 0-60
inline 6
guess the car

>>16665057
BMW 328i e36

>>16664010
Not really gearing on sports bikes is usually pretty tall and modern electronics take care of it nowadays.

My bike will do 0-60 in the the 2.6-2.8 second range. It'll also go 100mph in 1st, no anti-wheelie electronics so they just geared it insanely tall.

You could drop the gearing down quite and bit and be looking at a 0-60 closer to 2.2-2.4 but it'd lift way more easily. As it is it doesn't tend to lift unless you want it to.

That aside you'd still have to be a pretty awful rider to loop a bike.

2015 Renault Trafic (work van)
15.9 seconds... in an almost brand new vehicle

File: 1000.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

wikipedia tells me 2.4 seconds but id probably only be able to do 3

>>16663676
around 8.7s
>Duke 125

>>16663941
>Being a busrider
>Owning a bus pass
Fucking learn to drive

7.4

Econobox

Somewhere around 14s. I feel like i shouldn't even post itt.
>yfw i consider any sub 10s. car as FAST

>Acura RSX
>6.8 S

Factory states 3.9s.

1988 camaro 4.8 seconds, that's on slicks with full bolt ons and a cam

>2013 E92 335i
>4.6-5.3 depending on sources (BMW is conservative as hell with their own estimates)

Officialy 12,8 seconds from 0-62mph.
But I think that is a verry conservative figure.
I´ll test it out later with an epmty fuel tank and without the spare wheel.(actual spare wheel, no space savershit)

About 3.6s to 60

Not even a bike

>>16663676
About 3-3.3 seconds
Not sure on the old truck though, probably like 14-16

File: saturn going coning.jpg (291KB, 1199x900px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 1199x900px

>>16663676
6.2 seconds stock, never bothered clocking it with mods
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NytwmMfmHJk&index=3&list=FLf71e7QO4Fn1uUX3uTO9yUQ

>1991 MR2 Turbo
>0-snap in ~6.2

So published times or times we've measured? The Toyobaru does it in 6.2 seconds, according to C & D but I haven't timed it myself.

>>16663676
But Chargers aren't muscle cars' they mechanical garbage made for people to put crappy looking 22's on

About 4 seconds supposedly. Never tested it because I don't want to ruin the clutch.

Golf R stage 1.5 370 bhp

>>16663676
Lol I got 7 seconds flat on my Volvo 940 turbo..

>76 spitfire
>a few minutes on a good day.
Still love the slow piece of crap.

>>16664000
Yep, a tired 300 with blowby, 4.11 gears and a c6.

>>16664169
Trac bars

>>16666064
V6 models, maybe. The V8 is the epitome of a muscle car which you're probably confusing with pony car

>>16666205
Have you tried to use 10w60 oil?
Sometimes that helps to reduce blowby.

File: 2011_nissan_maxima_angularfront.jpg (28KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 640x480px

>Tfw I have one of the fastest cars in this thread
>Tfw 5.7 0-60
>Tfw 2011 nissan maxima

pretty comfy desu

>2002 audi TT quattro convertible
>6.9 secs

>mfw the non convertible coupe does 6.6

What the fuck? i thought the ragtop convertible would be faster since it doesnt have the heavy metal roof but apparently no

File: panicking-onion.gif (2MB, 480x266px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x266px

>>16663676
>Citroen C2
>1.1 litre engine, 52 BHP
>What is 70 mph?

>>16663676
this is almost as slow as my 4cyl accord

the 6cyl accords do under 6sec

you must have purchased a V6 charger base model

>>16666219
I'll try it. That is honestly a good idea for my next oil change

>09 G37 RWD
>4.8 according to the bluetooth dongle

Only mods are coils, front mounted intake, and EcuTek street tune.

>88 Toyota Supra
>6.5
New cars are too fast. ;_;
Only mod is a 3 inch turbo back.

>>16663676
not sure last i measured it was 6.4 seconds but that was over a year ago on premium fuel

running regular-mid grade stuff now and a totally different gearbox (went from 4l60e to t56)

Not gonna measure until i get a 3.7 final

File: 1437675848732.png (29KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 633x758px

7.9

>>16666702
Lol my old falcon did 7.8 on a good day

>Shit gearing + auto
Mainly gearing innit i bet you have a tall as fuq first

2005 BMW 330xi
Somewhere around 6.1-6.9 because I cannot find agreeing sources for the life of me.
Feels around the high 6s tho.

>>16666556
No you idiot, it now has a bunch of heavy motors and a heavy cloth instead.
Congrats you're retarded.
Everyone knows convertibles are slower 99% of the time.
I hope I'm being trolled.

File: porsche-2002-porsche-boxster-boxster-17252jpg.jpg (65KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 640x480px

5 seconds

it's ok.

i don't think i can manage that but i'll believe 986forums.

>>16666050
going into my /o/ cringe folder. thanks anon

File: 20170212_182324[1].jpg (1MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1440px

Probably in the low never evers.
Just kidding, according to official brochures and shit, it's in the 7 second range.

>>16663676
>Mazda 3 2014
>165hp manual
8 - 8,5s depending on conditions

I wish I could get the 2,5l engine in Europe.

File: 20160610_104639-min.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>16663676
like 7.6 seconds
hahahah

>2014 fiester st

Probably around 6.5 seconds

>>16666832
this image makes me want to vomit

File: bmw0002.jpg (306KB, 927x422px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 927x422px

>>16663676
specs say 4.6-4.7, but I'd only be able to squeeze out like 5.1-5.2

>90's car
>2.0 liter inline 4 turbo
>182 hp
>0-60 mph 6.7 sec

2005 Toyota Corolla
7.0 seconds

File: image.jpg (34KB, 600x337px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 600x337px

02 M5

About 5 seconds

w203 something like 7-8 I think

>>16665879
ah, the old >muh BMW always posts stats that are slower than the cars IRL
I actually know a guy IRL who has a 335i that has said the exact same thing to me several times.

chicken en plural

File: f278948344.jpg (927KB, 1912x1000px) Image search: [Google]

927KB, 1912x1000px

1995 MX-5 "miata"

Supposedly 8.4 sec stock. Pretty reasonable for something that puts less than 110 hp to the wheels.

>>16666205
lol i've got a 69 with the 390. probably something like 13-14 seconds 0-60

File: 1483925045912.jpg (38KB, 640x574px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 640x574px

>>16663686
>4000 lb
>250 hp/250 lb-ft 3.5 L V6
>4 speed auto

knowing those factors, a 0-60 time of 7.7 seconds would make sense.

File: IMAG0449.jpg (3MB, 4000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4000x3000px

15' SRT 392

4.1 according to magazines but the best i've gotten is 4.3. Could probably get it if i used the built-in launch control...

e6 528i
6.5s

>>16667827
>e6
whoops meant e60

>1998 Volvo S70 t5m
>6.0

A few mods and a decent set of summer tires so it's a little faster than stock. It's a little bit of a sleeper which is always fun.

>335i
>below 4 seconds

>>16663697
Lol being proud of any 0-60 time over 5.xx

>>16663676
kawasaki z1000
2.9 seconds

>>16663710
Do people these days really not fucking realize that originally, muscle cars were just shitboxes with big engines?

Are you really that retarded? Do you think every charger back in the 60's came with a 426 hemi?

>>16663803
I could do 5.5 pretty easily in my 08 with the 235 tires.

>>16665153
Finally someone living close to reality

>>16668197
Back to your containment threads

>>16664236
>be more of a burden to maneuver around apartment complexes.

Tickle the throttle and swing the ass end around. Bam 0 point turn. Problem? Git gud.

0-60 mph 14.7

Quarter mile 18.6

Come at me.

>>16668231
U drive a jet to work?

File: deezul willy.jpg (83KB, 766x960px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 766x960px

>>16668221
what's the matter, can't deal with your inferiority?

pic related, me with your girl. she just blew me, shit was SO cash.

File: CL450.jpg (130KB, 1200x967px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1200x967px

>>16668221

>Not even a sports bike, but regular every man bike from the 70's blows the fuck out of literally every car in this thread.

It's like cagers are afraid of speed or something.

>>16668231
18 seconds to 60 anon
1L fiat enjin signing in

>>16663676
>20 seconds
>super old shit box

>2008 G35 Sport
>5.3 sec

File: DSC00132.jpg (219KB, 1000x563px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1000x563px

>faggot mobile
>4.8s according to MotorTrend

>>16663676
2013 BMW M4
4.4 seconds

File: 1461963311782.gif (1001KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

1001KB, 640x480px

>'08 Civic
>Eventually

File: Screenshot_2017-01-13-21-40-27-1.png (2MB, 1440x1427px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x1427px

2000 audi a4

About 7.5 sec