>anon why did you buy this thing it doesn't even have

>>16630176
>doesn't even have a touchscreen dash board and there is no usb ports ugh!!!
Good

how cars ought to be. the only improvement the screen gives a car is GPS.

File: sebastianlinusimage_1.jpg (14KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 300x300px

>>16630176
>mfw the model s is faster to 60 than a 350k dollar italian shitbox
bwahahhahahahaa

ice fags need to kill themselves

It does have USB tho

>>16630186
>Tesla has faster 0-60
>now used up 75% of your battery
>Ferrari used maybe 1% of its tank

>letting a roastie on your car

File: 1454140607408.png (40KB, 362x362px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 362x362px

>>16630227
>ice are so shit ice fags have to make up lies about electric cars

>>16630186
Tell that to the alpha romeo guy

If some bitch asked why I bought a Ferrari and made those complaints, she'd be out of the car pretty much immediately.

File: 1486022537187.jpg (15KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 480x480px

>>16630242
>nurburgring lap times for an F430: 7:55.00
>nurburgring lap times for a Tesla: insufficient battery
>yfw

ITT: things that will never happen or be said

>>16630910
>still slower to 60

>>16630932
so youre admitimg that tesla cant compete

>>16630938
No, they can't. There is no competition because the Model S is the fastest accelerating mass production car in history.

>>16630949
Too bad they can only accelerate to 60mph once before they need to be charge for 7 hours

>>16630949
>what is the 911 turbo
>what are muscle cars

File: 121b034dba3c2f39201a3fa9f782eb85.jpg (44KB, 736x595px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 736x595px

>>16630995
>Model S P100D: 0-60 in 2.2. seconds
>911 Turbo S: 0-60 in 2.5 seconds
>>16630980
>ice fags blatantly lying
They lose around 1% battery per launch going from 0-120.

>gm fangirls ragequit