Why have I never seen this before now? Are you guys holding out

File: hurst_amc_sc_rambler_3.jpg (1MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1536px

>>16626751
>Shelby Mustang
>obscure

lolwat

>>16626751
Because Mach 1.

File: 001-1970-amc-rebel-machine-1971-amc-matador-machine-driving-alt-1.jpg (2MB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1360px

anyhoo I like muscle/pony cars that arent the constantly wanked over Chevelles Cudas Camaros and Mustangs so I will sit around

>>16626790
I saw the picture floating around and assumed someone had a mustang hatefuck a challenger

>>16626810
> Smug superiority on an Algerian fridge maintenance forum

File: mustang rear.jpg (418KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

418KB, 1600x1200px

>>16626896

It's really the harbinger to the 71+ Mustangs, they got really pancaked and flat.

Boss 429 and Mach 1 SCJ are nicer IMO...dat ass.

File: amc javelin.jpg (516KB, 1023x548px) Image search: [Google]

516KB, 1023x548px

>>16626908

HE LIKES THINGS YOU'VE NEVER HEARD OF

SHOW SOME RESPECT

File: chevy nova.jpg (346KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 1600x1200px

Chevy needs to bring back the Nova to compete with high horsepower nip cars

>you will never, ever have a 1968 Firebird

File: 51acb89395e092c906727cdf7b931815.jpg (78KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 640x360px

Muh judge

File: 438831-1000-0.jpg (136KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1000x666px

>>16626908
I dont have a problem with them its just that they are overexposed and boring at this point

>>16626945

http://dynacornbodies.com/body-shells/firebird/

>>16626936
Compact American V8 literally the dream
It'd end up a fat turd thoug

File: chevrolet corvette - 1963.png (331KB, 1193x429px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 1193x429px

>>16626951

Just watched the Jay Leno's Garage episode with The Judge.

My god it really didn't sound very good, very raspy and hoarse like it was dying.

>>16626955
I'll give you that my good sir

File: Mustang - Mach 1 - 1970.jpg (96KB, 1000x567px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1000x567px

>>16626957

>driving a repro kit car

KYS my man.

>>16626958

Probably, it had too man forward angles. Muh pedestrians would have busted pelvises left and right.

>>16626955

>boring

Nigga don't embarrass yourself.

File: 143700.jpg (968KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

968KB, 1920x1080px

Muh hairy pornstar mustang

File: maxresdefault.jpg (40KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 1280x720px

>>16626981

I like to pretend these never happened.

File: 1970-mercury-cyclone-spoiler-front-in-motion.jpg (389KB, 2048x1340px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 2048x1340px

>>16626977
yawn

another Mustang

File: Mad-Max-Fury-8razor.jpg (79KB, 730x411px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 730x411px

>>16626977
You act like busting pelvises is bad

>>16626960

>Basing the icon off one car that probably had a mock stock setup for exhaust.

>>16626977
What's wrong with a kit car?

File: oldsmobile-442-5.jpg (230KB, 1024x547px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1024x547px

>yfw someone tells you the 442 represents engine ci

all of my reeee

File: 0604phr_01_z-1976_ford_mustang_ii-.jpg (122KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 640x480px

>>16626981
>>16626999

Mustang ii has so much untapped cool potential

File: 1446485712190.jpg (59KB, 535x432px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 535x432px

>>16627012

Nothing if you're a closeted homosexual who pays black men to fuck his wife.

>>16627015

That spoiler is trash.

>>16627030
The spoiler is cool

File: lol.jpg (34KB, 585x339px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 585x339px

>>16627027

Your mullet is showing.

>>16627027
problem is with its proportions it will always look bad

>>16627030
its the same one on the borestang

>>16627030
Kit cars are fine if you have the cash, but it's normally cheaper to do a regular car. Shame arent availible for cars I actually like.

I have wet dreams of a hellcat Daytona


That's also somehow AWD

File: toyota celica 1972.jpg (467KB, 1024x640px) Image search: [Google]

467KB, 1024x640px

>>16627057

Mustang has proper proportions for a spoiler that size. It doesn't look dwarfed on a Mach1.

>>16627057
What's Rong with the proportions? Other than being a bit chubby

File: 1976_00008_03.jpg (282KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 1000x562px

>>16627108
it has a mile of overhang the body is just too big for the Pinto chassis

it looks comedic

File: Front 3:4 action.jpg (350KB, 1280x775px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 1280x775px

best muscle sleeper

13 second car but looks like somplete shit

>>16627159
I really don't see it

File: IMG_2108.png (2MB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 750x1334px

>>16627001
He needs to get this fixed it's bugging me

File: [email protected]?rev=2.jpg (234KB, 2000x930px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 2000x930px

>captcha is a stanced Audi

kek

>>16627228
thats fine

I sure do

>>16627159
Looks fine to me

File: 2891070035_large.jpg (160KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1024x768px

>>16626955
That '68 is unf.
Do want.

It's a good thing it's not popular because it's cheaper. Compare a 30k 68 olds to a 90k chevelle any year.

File: cutlass4.jpg (391KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

391KB, 1200x900px

AWD cutlass

>>16626960
Watched the video also, they said at the end there was an exhaust leak and issue with the timing. A healthy 400 sounds way better

File: IMG_0080.jpg (149KB, 790x527px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 790x527px

>muh aero-die-namics

File: dodge-daytona-1969a.jpg (15KB, 400x186px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 400x186px

>>16628833
Back off

>>16627400
$30k is still way out of my league.

>tfw no cheap muscle
>tfw all the barn finds are gone
>tfw I KNOW WHAT I GOT

>>16629082
buy a Nova or Falcon

>>16627022
442 is kind of close to 455, right? Or 400 for the older ones.

I also hate when people say that, but can we talk about the aneurysm-inducing clone stamping going on in the left side of the image? What the fuck was so important about some yellow hot rod that it had to be eradicated from the planet?

>>16629090
442 is model. Oldsmobile had 400's and 455's

File: 1987_Ford_Thunderbird_Turbo_Coupe.jpg (40KB, 500x311px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 500x311px

>4 cylinder that had a higher top speed than a v8
>not a mustang but was one of fords best handling cars
>most aerodynamic fox body ever made

Its definitely a weird car all around

File: 33fc5665797b878810df1423c26ea867.jpg (26KB, 393x262px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 393x262px

>>16626751

>>16626790
Definitely deserves the award for the ugliest hood scoop in the history of muscle cars.

>>16626951
Mmmmh, I had a HotwheeIs of that thing.

File: MACHINE.jpg (405KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 1500x1000px

>>16626790

>>16626790
>>16626751
Those were the Hertz rental cars, right?

File: f0f7f2347c06c2781c40615a33afbf05.jpg (173KB, 1600x1000px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1600x1000px

>>16631213
no

those were GT350H

>>16627400

68 had the best rear end even though there was no spoiler for that year. I love the skinny taillights and dual exhaust cutouts.