What's wrong with the new NSX? It's better than the

>>16597736
>hybrid trash drivetrain
>autistic transmission
>slow
>useless technology
>no godtier driving feel + experience as the original nsx
>expensive as all fuck for a trash car

it was literally designed by a woman

Nothing, it's a cool ass car.

However, it was doomed to be hated by autistic idiots for a couple of reasons.

>REEE ITS NOT 90s SUPACAR ITS MODERN I HAET IT!!
>REEE A WOMAN WAS THE LEAD DESIGNER!!!! WOMEN CANT INTO CARS!! XDDDD

>>16597736
>doesn't even have a proper manual
>$156,000

Why would anyone buy the new one when the could buy 4 of the old ones for the same price? The fucking type-r is almost $200k.

File: 10850194.jpg (26KB, 450x305px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 450x305px

>>16597736
first gen nsx curb weight: ~3,000-3,150 lbs.
second gen nsx curb weight: ~24,500 lbs.

>>16597761
>i am a busrider & i am appreciative of quite literally any shitbox because even the worst designed/engineered cuckbox is better than using the ol' buspass

>>16597761
This guy gets it

It's a baby 918 Spyder and you don't see autists sperging out over the Porsche not being just another Carrera GT

>>16597767

>being this autistic
>projecting this hard.

Many such cases on this board. Sad!

they forgot the spirit of the original which was meant to be a supercar that was reliable and put more emphasis on handling than power and speed. the new one has put too much importance on tech than good lightweight handling. the first one also broke some ground when it was the first all aluminum semi monocoque because senna just kept saying it needed to be more stiff whereas the new one feels more like its following in the footsteps of the other cars its competing against so basically 0/10 its trash we want an nsx not an nsx badge. take your fancy tech and shove it and get a prized formula 1 driver to help you design it so it handles as good as the first one.

>>16597736
>>16597761
>>16597755

The car is a pile of junk. It is simply not in line with what we expected from a modern supercar. The interior is complete shit. It makes the same power as a used M6 I can find on Craigslist for $16,000, and it's being sold for $180,000~

also

>honda

File: drank.jpg (8KB, 178x178px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 178x178px

>>16597736
Because the new one is an ill-conceived concept prototype that somehow made it's way into production. It's way too interested in showing you all the cool things it can do rather than being actually useful

>Muh hybrid
>Fuk manuel
>FUTUR TEK

>The Google Glass of Cars

File: 9uyich.jpg.png (186KB, 337x296px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 337x296px

>>16597736
>looks shit compared to the original
>hybrid
>ANGRY ANGRY FURIOUS FACE
>too expensive for what it is

>>16597788
basically this
fucking mazda better pull their shit together and revive rx-7, there are the last hope when it comes to affordable, lightweight supercars with good handling

>can get a faster McLaren for less and not have to have a Honda badge on it

>>16597788
or you know, just start making the old one again, i'd dish out serious money for that

It's too hebby at 3800 lbs

>>16597767
>Autism Speaks: The Post

>>16597736
This is a beguinners sports car.
Probably the best car for /o/ benchracers, since that torque vectoring will make the car grip and get nice lap times without effort.

>What's wrong with the new NSX?
nothing, your just poor and mad you can't afford one

>>16597750
okay

define slow

>>16597851
the rx7 was never "affordable"

>>16597736
>>16597750

i thought it was disappointing the first time i saw pictures but in person it is really, really impressive.

also,
>commenting on driving feel/experience without having driven one in anger.

>>16597736
>It's half a hypercar for the price of an Audi R8.

Why not just buy an r8?
>that glorious V10

>>16597736

I know this isn't a controversial opinion, but I love the looks of the old NSX compared to the new one.

It's like the homely yet cute chick you had a crush on back in high school vs the fake-titted, makeup-ed pornstar you just jacked off to 10 minutes ago.

>>16597750
>slow

It's a hell of a lot faster than the old NSX, what's your point again?

>>16597761
>>16597769

>we are massive flaming faggots and we love to express our homosexuality

>>16600470
>projecting this hard

File: 1355939231634.gif (369KB, 500x271px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 500x271px

>>16600451
> homely yet cute chick you had a crush on back in high school vs the fake-titted, makeup-ed pornstar you just jacked off to 10 minutes ago

Thanks for the flood of regret and sadness.

File: 1473351499421.jpg (238KB, 1300x975px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 1300x975px

>>16600329
>>16600461

Apparently he refers to this, I think he meant slightly slower than some other car for example C7 gs & z06, vipers, also only slightly faster than gt350r (which a glorifies mustang, lol mustang can't turn rite?).

I mean /o/ always crazy about muh feel and muh affordable shitbox, I think they prefer a vette, viper or gt350r which may someday fall to their budget.

t. Benchracingfag & busrider. I've just lost my job so I shitposting in here fampai.

>>16601091
who on /o/ can even afford an nsx?

i asked about buying a new car and literally no one replies jack shit for days

i make a thread about how to fix an old shitbox and get replies within minutes

why is this board so poor?

i really like it.

>>16597736
>hypercar for the price of an Audi R8

Wasn't it slower around Willow Springs than the GT350R?

>>16601181
And the GT350R is slower than a shifter kart, what's your point?

>>16601126
>who on /o/ can even afford an nsx?
A new one? Pretty much no one. But an NA1 or NA2? A number of posters can, and a few have one already.

>why is this board so poor?
Because many of the most active posters are young, like the rest of 4chan. And most college students can't afford a nice car.

>>16601126
You know it and yet you still ask it here. Every car especially almost all expensive cars have their own owners forum. Why don't you go ask there if you are rich?

File: honda-nsx-s-na1-1997-2001-1.jpg (489KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

489KB, 1600x1200px

>>16597788
Autistic, but not at all wrong. The new one flaunts all the tech they could cram into it, but it's not at all in the spirit of the original. It's an
NSX only in name and very vague resemblance.

I can't help but wonder who the targeted market is. The GT-R has the "affordable supercar" down and Tesla's snapping up all the tech geeks who want an electric supercomputer on wheels.

>>16597755
Really for real wtf

Car on the left:
Rare come to smashyfish sushi. Har can I herp you?
Car in right: no fish for me, I just have miso and ship some tea

File: 223491.jpg (69KB, 629x360px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 629x360px

>>16597750
>>hybrid trash drivetrain
Get used to it because that will be almost every sports/super car if they haven't gone electric by then.

>>autistic transmission
Again, this will probably become more and more common.

>>slow
At least it wasn't barely faster than base model C4 corvettes of its time like that last NSX on top of getting creamed on in any sort of straight line by almost everything in its class.

>>useless technology
AWD seems pretty useful to me. Hybrid system eliminates turbo lag.

>>no godtier driving feel + experience
Boomer tier shit, who cares. buy a miata or pay a fuck-ton of money for a "911R" which is just a slower 911 GT3 "feels" edition.

>>expensive as all fuck for a trash car
Other than accord reliability the last nsx didn't really have anything objective going for it to justify what, $60,000-90,000 price tag? most people still went for a vette, 911, or from Japan a skyrine of some sort. It was also Naturally aspirated which i'm not sure if that made it much less mod-friendly/more expensive to mod compared to the other turbo japanese cars which could easily gain more power and hold it. You use forced induction on an NSX you could possibly fuck up its resale value and on a car that expensive probably wasn't a wise idea.

>>16597736
>What's wrong with the new NSX?
No TAIPU ARRU

>>16601338
>Other than accord reliability the last nsx didn't really have anything objective going for it to justify what, $60,000-90,000 price tag?

>"I don't really know anything about the NSX"

File: 1484686763369.gif (36KB, 265x200px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 265x200px

>>16601228
>what's your point?
That the NSX is slower than the GT350R around Willow Springs.

File: 9e9f2dcfdb878cd0141ad97176ed0888.jpg (58KB, 1053x702px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 1053x702px

>>16597736
My friend worked with Acura and Honda during 2002 and 2005. He was a design intern and this was one of his 'In-house Future NSX Contest' render entry. How do you like it?

>>16602435
Peugeot 407/10

>>16597851
>rx7
>supercar

what

slow piece of shit...i can smoke the fuck out of this in my 1994 EG hatch with a couple of simple mods:

- 10 point cage with Parachute
- 3 piece discontinued JoJo frontend
- spec-R full drag suspension
- Fuel cell with -8 lines from tank to motor
- 1 044 bosch pump
- 1200 rc injectors
- golden eagle sleeved block
- cp 10:1 pistons
- Eagle rods
- arp headstuds
- oem h22 headgasket
- Balance shaft delete
- competition clutch twin disc
- Port and polished head
- skunk2 valve springs and retainers
- Str cam gears
- crower stage 1 cams
- aluminium radiator with slim fan
- gsr transmission with itr lsd.
- qsd h2k intake manifold adapter
- k20 rbc manifold
- qsd throttle body spacer
- blox 70mm throttle body
- 4bar omni map sensor
- 6al msd with coil and cap. 3 step launch control
- hks bov
- Garret 102mm turbocharger.
- Custom t4 front facing turbo manifold with 44mm flange
- 44mm tial wastegate
- Custom water to air intercooler set up
- aem eugo wideband w/ gauge
- tuned on chipped p28
- 13 inch volks drag rims
- 2 15 inch volks rear rims
- arp extended wheel studs
- si cluster
- 150 shots of nitrous

im making 248 horsepower to the FRONT WHEELS because thats the only place the power should ever be.

>>16602462
I mean they were faster than the NSX when they came out, but the NSX from that same period is famously fucking awful.

>>16602435
Looks like an evora fucked a cts coupe.

The NSX was one of the first cars to feature a Honda VTEC DOHC engine, so my assumption for the new one is that Honda's pushing some new tech with it.

>>16604243
lol this guy still posts here?

do you even have a car now i thought you crashed your miata, does it still have weeb comics plastered over it

File: muh cahhh.jpg (172KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 960x960px

>>16604254

I grew up and got 2 more doors. Nice seeing you too, my guy.

>>16604259
>goes from being a Miata-driving faggot to an Audi-driving cuckold

You can't make this shit up, folks.

>>16604259
still zero taste, i see

well nice talking to you, back on the filter you go

File: 385.jpg (21KB, 317x267px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 317x267px

>>16604259
>windshield stickers

>>16597736
everyone here wants a shitty Cccord engined analog shitbox that looks like a kit car so they pretend the new NSX is bad

File: 1442786423942.jpg (36KB, 420x418px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 420x418px

>>16604271
>>16604274
>>16604278

>>16601267
I think they're looking at the "affordable hyper-car" market, but I'm not so sure there's a market for that. It's right in the price range of Ferrari's and Lambo's as well

File: 1408642562cc7075316ba39d01f9239e0d13b30a09.jpg (606KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

606KB, 1200x800px

>>16604348
>>16601267
>affordable hypercar
>affordable supercar

Fuck that shit, just give me a lightweight, mid-engine, barebones car with a decent engine that costs about as much as an M3 and I'll be happy.

It doesn't have to have this hybrid, AWD, ten speed triple clutch, infotainment-packed crap. That's what makes cars like the new NSX so damn expensive in the first place.

Put the Type-R Civic engine into the back of a 2 seater coupe with a 6 speed manuél, make it look like a Ferrari, and price it accordingly.

Fuck these expensive halo cars, and fuck the le angry grille meme.

>>16602462
The RX-7 was faster than the Corvette and the top-of-the-line 911 Turbo when it came out in 1992.
It was a "super sportscar" at least, and an emissions-delete away from rivaling cars like the F40, given what a dis-proportionally high increase in power and weight savings it gained doing that over other cars.

And the expectation would be that if they made a new RX-7, it'd also near/beat the NSX along with so many other much more expensive cars.

>>16604451
So an S660 and you can swap the engine yourself?

But they won't sell those outside of Nippon.

>>16597736
>It's better than the older one in every way possible and looks very cool too.
its
>heavier
>no aftermarket
>absolutely boring and over complicated hybrid crap
>brake by wire
>>16597755
on the contrary it looks okay-ish and the designer is a qt and seems like a real carchick that isnt the problem.

My problem with it is its too heavy, too complicated and just over cooked.

I doubt it will age as well as the original

File: slider-3.jpg (124KB, 1200x608px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1200x608px

>>16604451
http://www.k1-attack.com/

>>16597765
Bullshit, you cannot buy 4 NSXs for 156 grand. I wanna know what bizzaro land you live in so I can go pick up a mint NSX for less than 40 grand.

>>16604259
If you grew up, why did you stance your car?

File: nsxfast.png (31KB, 562x674px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 562x674px

>>16597750
>expensive as all fuck for a trash car
less than 150k and faster than everything short of the (discontinued) viper and million dollar hypercar triplets

>>16601267
>it's an NSX only in name
which is exactly what its meant to be. learn what NSX means retard

>>16606350
>absolutely boring
share your driving experiences of it with us then

>>16597788
>take your fancy tech and shove it
New Sportscar eXperimental

>>16602435
Looks like something Honda would use to market as a new Del Sol.

>>16606342
Thanks for reminding me to go all the way with my emissions delete, anon.

My county doesn't even do emissions testing when inspections are done. Already sitting on a downpipe, might as well take the extra few steps. After a few other small mods and rekajiggering the ECU I might be able to crank the little fucker to 350hp, going to start researching what all to do now.

Would be really interesting to see how a new RX-7 stacks up, though I'm doubting it'll be called that. With the Supra coming back too, though, things are getting interesting. Would really like to see a return to the days of mid-range sportscars being as good or better than their $100k+ competition.

>>16600339
It was, my uncle was a truck driver and had one when they were new in his 20s

>>16604211
It's 348hp not 248, and the timing was not right I'm sorry

>>16597750
what the fuck is an "autistic" transmission

>>16602435
That would've looked better than the abomination Acura/Honda produces now.

>>16601126
what's the point of hanging out and shitposting on an auto board if you don't tinker around with older/cheaper cars.

>Oh hey /o/, still got my Jetta I bought brand new from the dealer a few months ago. Everything seems to be going fine so far. Have a nice day everybody.

>>16606519
those who think they are more perfect than a machine aka typical manual bbc craving fags

>>16606358
>share your driving experiences of it with us then
>Auto
>Hybrid
>weird braking system
I can literally load it up in simulators and get the same experiance

Its boring.

Maybe in 10 years people might warm up to it when ToyoHondaJDM Mega corp relases the NSX2 people will have nostalgia for it but i fucking doubt it.

Cars these days are applicances with no soul 9/10 and normies upgrade to the newest model every 1-3 years when their lease is up

>>16606609
It's usually the poor fuckers who complain about everything.

>>16606561
Jetta off the lot for more than a month doing "ok". Nice one... almost got me.

>>16606609
>I can literally load it up in simulators and get the same experiance
stop posting

>>16606353
I actually really like how this is styled.

The backup lights and taillights could be done a bit nicer, but otherwise pretty sexy and tasteful.

>>16606358
Your own image proves the Viper ACR is better.

Faster, more of a driver's car, and cheaper.
Looks better, too.

>>16606447
Well you should keep the catback. A modern catback doesn't obstruct too much and it keeps it from smelling like shit.

The precat, however, is heavy and greatly lowers your spool times. It decreases reliability, too. So yeah, absolutely remove that and replace with a simple downpipe.

I'm pretty sure you can defeat smog in most states/countries with just a catback and alternate tune, as well. But I'm in Florida, and we don't do smog tests.

>>16602435
No. It looks equally shitty.

>>16602435
holy shit this is ugly af on paper but i'm surei f it was created they would've got rid of the bulge.

>>16606690
discontinued

File: vogdomit.jpg (114KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 720x960px

>>16602435

>>16601091
mustang still cant turn.ridiculous power makes it look fast

>>16606630
>Electric Steering
>electric brakes
Lol there is literally no difference
>muh g forces
oh wow sure worth that $150k+ it costs to buy one just ot have it devalue like shit

>>16597736
>the old thing was better
faggotary. always. people like what they liked before and cant get used to new things.

>>16602435
OP here. Should I tell my friend the whole of 4chan(except one) disliked his design?

i'm honestly having trouble putting into words what exactly went wrong here. i just know i don't like it

File: 2017-Acura-NSX-013.jpg (1MB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1280px

>>16597736

Went to the DC Auto Show with my pops recently, Acura had a maroon one on display.

By far my favorite car of the show. It's tremendously good-looking in person.

I'd absolutely buy one.

>>16597736
Not to sound like a bandwagon faggot, but the longer I look at the image, the more I want the original NSX. Idk, it just grows on me... of course, the new NSX looks modern and all, but its something I've seen for a long ass time and I would rather buy an AUDI V10 over the new NSX.

The old NSX, however, is just a fun car to drive. It doesn't need those hybrid power bullshit. Just give me a well tuned engine and lets go.

>>16607441
kill yourself kid, seriously

>>16597736
its wrong because it's not the car that was on the poster in my childhood bedroom

>>16597736
pigfat.
senna is rolling in his grave.

>>16602435
>lambo front
>lotus roof
>cadillac rear
is he gook?