>This car was released in 2003 Find a car model that has

altima aged pretty well imo

Rx-8

Could've posted less retarded picture to begin with, OP

File: 1411099379516.jpg (410KB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

410KB, 1800x1200px

1970

Major reason why I own a speed 3 of this generation. Fucking stunning car

>>16531518
It gives me an early 80s vibe, except the back looks like a 60s concept.

File: f2511012.jpg (235KB, 1280x823px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 1280x823px

>>16531526
imo it aged very well

File: 130221984383.png (84KB, 299x288px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 299x288px

>>16531518
Pls be trolling

>>16531527
that pic does it much more justice

File: IMG_5881.jpg (200KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1920x1080px

>>16531504
This Aged much better than your pathetic ford did, OP.

File: mazda-3-2008-17.jpg (3MB, 3869x1824px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3869x1824px

>>16531515

File: ubsk8kdnmyh6kkmth15r.jpg (73KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 800x600px

>>16531535
Mazdas in general age pretty well

File: 08-BMW-E60-M5---Space-Grey-Metallic--on-Red~~element55.jpg (31KB, 766x391px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 766x391px

2003

File: DSC00309.jpg (65KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 640x480px

>>16531535
>stancefag garbage

File: 2002_Volkswagen_Phaeton_40697.jpg (50KB, 719x442px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 719x442px

>>16531624
2002

>>16531634

File: 1024px-Mini_One_(R50)_–_Frontansicht,_12._Juni_2011,_Düsseldorf.jpg (156KB, 1024x589px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1024x589px

>>16531634
2001

>>16531673
thank u

File: bmw_530xi_e60___interior_01_by_localstranger-d68su4d.jpg (167KB, 1032x774px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1032x774px

>>16531624
This.

Still looks like it came out yesterday.

Then again BMW interior design hasnt come all that far in 15 years so in a way I'm not surprised.

File: 4906005_Cecil_s_Vette-0221.jpg (181KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1280x960px

1997

File: IMG_4384.jpg (249KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1920x1080px

C5

>1997-2004
>pop-up headlights for muh aesthetics

File: front_facia_021603.jpg (35KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 640x480px

A cute!

File: nsx sssss.jpg (68KB, 960x630px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 960x630px

1990

>>16531731
>huge drilled and slotted rotors in the back
>stock blanks up front

The fuck?

File: IMG_4385.jpg (40KB, 600x468px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 600x468px

>>16531731
>>16531738

File: 1441849952292.png (511KB, 621x621px) Image search: [Google]

511KB, 621x621px

>>16531535

File: nsx6951652_6792f71e6f_o.jpg (139KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1280x853px

>>16531749

>>16531535
>>16531631
>>16531731
>>16531738
>>16531763
>>16531747

Pop up master race

>>16531748
better braking for the drive wheels? Thats my guess.

>>16531773
But the weight shifts forward when you brake and the drive wheels aren't powered while braking usually.

File: avanti.jpg (180KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 640x427px

1963

File: 9e7e3f02-b16e-439e-8134-003ea1107e19.jpg (247KB, 1468x767px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1468x767px

>>16531801
those wheels are not a good match for the car

>>16531801
No.

>>16531504
Getting mangled by some stancefag is not aging well.

File: 15977227_10154779611546427_1876833175790239226_n.jpg (43KB, 471x315px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 471x315px

>>16531550
1994

>>16531748
>>16531773
>>16531780
The front rotors are drilled and slotted too, if you look closely. From the angle the picture was taken it looks like the rear rotors are bigger though it could just be an optical illusion and in reality the rotors are the same size all around. Even then though that's unusual because corvettes have smaller rotors on the rear albeit still drilled and slotted

>>16531744
Eh this still looks alright-ish, but they're age definitely shows

File: 30ICGEA6.jpg (51KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 500x375px

G35. Sedan and coupe.

>>16532147
yuck those ugly headlights
nearly as big as the jukes

>>16532147

Naw. They got the horrible "2000's jellybean" look going on. Sorry Mohammad.

File: image.jpg (26KB, 564x375px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 564x375px

1970

File: 1zMDrohh.jpg (63KB, 1024x619px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1024x619px

>>16532178
meh
try 1963

File: mazda rx-7 fd red.jpg (114KB, 1280x782px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1280x782px

>>16531535
omg whoever did that shouuld be shot

>pic is what it should look like and what OP's post should have been.

FD is the best looking car to come out of Japan.
NSX too boxy, Poopra looks like a bar of soap

>>16531504
holy shit, and they're super cheap too
gonna cop me one rn

>>16532495
>FD is the best looking car to come out of Japan.
>people actually believe this

>>16532540
Sorry about your crippling mental illness

File: honda_s2000_1999.jpg (95KB, 584x328px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 584x328px

my son

File: 546b530b6cbab_-_2004-acura-tsx-lg.jpg (30KB, 565x315px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 565x315px

I say the TSX aged pretty decently.

Released in 2004

File: DSC00214.jpg (45KB, 758x284px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 758x284px

>>16532146
>Adorable blushing aero egg hatch with Sr20 and A CUTE

>>16531504
Original NSX
Volvo C30 first gen
Ferrari 360 Modena
Citroen DS2
Mazda RX7 FD
Skyline R34

I would even argue the third gen MR2 still looks great

File: HSV-VX-GTS-Clubsport-Brochure-Holden-Original-Memorabilia-_57.jpg (299KB, 1600x1112px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 1600x1112px

>>16531504
Is this another Aesthetics thread?

File: McLaren-F1-1993-hd[1].jpg (257KB, 2560x1920px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 2560x1920px

1993

File: 1997-mclaren-f1-gtr-longtail[1].jpg (332KB, 800x510px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 800x510px

>>16532910
and then this thing came out in 97 and it looks older?

>>16531504
the toyota 2000gt

i could literally post thousands of cars but we all knew this already

>>16531504

>aged well

Nobody else moved forward.

>>16531801
That thing looks tacky af.

File: honda s500.jpg (1MB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1360px

>>16532540
>doesn't post an alternative
Good Job

>>16532593
Literally the blandest looking convertible produced by someone other than Toyota or some murican shitbox.

>pic related

>>16532919
I ready dont like the GT, I like the original F1 much better. Was the GT any better performance wise?

>>16531535
>pop up lights
>low beltline
>aged well

File: landscape-1462289981-gt-r.jpg (79KB, 980x490px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 980x490px

>no one has posted this yet

This and the other GTRs for that matter

>>16531504
i hate wagons and hatchbacks, the mazda models are the only acceptable looking ones imo

File: IMG_0309.jpg (217KB, 1152x514px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1152x514px

'65

File: IMG_5920.jpg (201KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 1024x768px

>>16531504
2001

The fact that Astons haven't changed much aesthetically helps a lot

Why change perfection though?

>>16532977
>ford hasn't improved its shitty design in over 70 years
Who would've guessed??

>>16532978

replace the headlights with HIGHLY DETAILED led lights (lots of stupid shapes going on in there), put some sharp creases like on the hood on the side and you have a brand new looking car

>>16532919
muh racecar rules is why
also its fuck ugly
>>16532972
nah that looks VERY late 80's to me
>>16532977
timeless
>>16532978
this

File: HONDACRXDelSol-3056_1.jpg (462KB, 1024x614px) Image search: [Google]

462KB, 1024x614px

>>16531504
>1993

>>16532991
I kinda prefer the incandescent look over the projection lights tbqh

File: ergh.jpg (26KB, 380x380px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 380x380px

>>16532187

not changing your design for 54 years doesn't count

File: twingo-21183420-mLG.jpg (139KB, 750x563px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 750x563px

>1993 - 2007/2012

It wasn't a beauty but it was definitely ahead of its time a couple years.
Looked most at home around 2000

>>16532985
>trying to """"improve"""" perfection

>>16531528
it aged well mate. it looks 'old' since anything that isnt a monstrosity of the CURRENT YEAR and bloated as fuck is pre 2010 anyway.

>>16533003
the 90's called they want their puke back

>>16532187
Is there a reason why older sports cars didn't have wide tires

>>16532962
>>low beltline
I can excuse people not liking pop ups, but how the fuck is a high belt line a good thing?

>>16533016
Do it right, do it once.

>>16533034
Tire tech was utter shit up until like the 90's
They simply didn't know how to build quality wide tires.

Wheels were small and sidewalls large because they hadn't figured out how to balance sidewall stiffness with comfort quite yet. Lots of decades of suspension development since then.

And with respect to the old 911, the thing weighed about 2,200 lbs and had 130-180 horsepower stock, that's Miata tier power & weight, Miata's get sold today with 205 tires on a 7" wheel, first gen 911's had 6.5" wheels so it's not like it's under tired. Except you know, accounting for the shitty compounds back then.

>>16533034
They didn't have massive horsepower and they were very lightweight. They didn't need huge tires to put the power down.
Also the fastest way around a corner in an old Porsche is sideways, and the thin tires help that.

File: 1bcey5.jpg (79KB, 750x500px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 750x500px

>>16531504
>>16531518
>>16531527
>>16531540
>>16531547
>>16531550
>>16531631
>>16531634
>>16531705
>>16531720
>>16531744
>>16531791
>>16531801
>>16531807
>>16532118
>>16532147
>>16532187
>>16532495
>>16532609
>>16532693
>>16532799
>>16532919
>>16532948
>>16532972
>>16532977
>>16532978
>>16532998
>>16533003
>>16533022

>>16531547
Muh
Dick

>>16533100
oh look its another tripfag with shit taste

File: bmw_m5_sedan_7.jpg (188KB, 1500x904px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1500x904px

>>16533113
I have impeccable taste ask anyone

>>16533100
>tags Mustang
>not Challenger

>>16533116
>muh e3x m5
shit taste

hahahahahaha GTFO OP with that rebadged focus. They literally are the definition of rust.

File: 2341054-1969-lincoln-continental-std.jpg (272KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 1280x960px

Timeless.

>>16533121
e34, nobody had black plastic door handles come 2000 except Kia.

>>16533209
i miss those chrome steel handles

>>16533193
>Timeless.
Timeless implies something so ageless you can't tell how old it is.

That thing was the shitbox of my grandfather's generation.

>>16533121
>not liking e34/39 m5
plebeian status confirmed

>>16533193
Front end of these is just too damn good

>>16533215
i dont like over rated m5 boy racer eurotax crap

the lesser models are actually better bases with all the m goodies swapped in

00 4runner

>>16533211
>Let's make door handles out of metal so they burn the shit out of people using them when it's hot out.

No thanks.

>>16533215
This thread isn't about what cars you like.

Fuck even a goddamn Plymouth Prowler fits better than any BMW that isn't the 507.

>>16533117
Both are ugly and dated shitboxes

>>16533264
ausfag here your a pussy

>wanting big plastic death slots that spidermen hide under

>almost everyone ITT posting old as fuck looking cars

fuckin retards

>>16533335
Please point out the kind of cars you want more of.

>>16533351
>>16531504
>>16531535
>>16531550
>>16531624
>>16531631
>>16531634
>>16531705
>>16532535
>>16532910
>>16532978
>>16533244

File: $_1.jpg (40KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 400x300px

C U T E

File: 2009_Mitsubishi_Lancer_(CJ_MY10)_RX_sedan_(2015-08-07)_01.jpg (157KB, 1024x587px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 1024x587px

Tbqh this design has aged very well. It's now 10 years old and doesn't look dated by today's standards. I would never own or drive a Mitsubishi because I'm not a homosexual, but the design really does put a lot of stuff to shame.

>>16533558

That is ancient as fuck, it was dated the minute it sold.

>>16533244

BMW designs are timeless - you don't get judged for driving an old one. If anything, people will be less kind to you for driving a brand new one.

>>16532147

Do not make such claims, they make you appear foolish.

>>16531705

Pretty much a copy of the original Mini, so I'm not sure if it's relevant to this discussion.

>>16531634

VWs age terribly, their new designs look like something from 2008 - it's fucked how they keep screwing up like that. Their Audis turn out fine, but these new VWs make me want to shoot someone.

>>16531631

Typical blobbish 90's styling. Gross.

>>16533624
>Car with perfect aero in 1991 looked dated on release
Are you vehemently retarded all the time? Everything else was a wedge or box.

File: dog.jpg (173KB, 766x687px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 766x687px

>>16533640

That looks old but that doesn't mean it's not nice. Old cars can be dated looking and still be attractive. Like women in their 40's.

>>16531705
At least put the Mini Cooper S up you mongoloid

>>16532799
All Commodores look like shit though, especially older HSV's.

every car with popups aged like shit
any car with lots of chrome fins and the like aged like shit
any car with design that is painfully obvious what time period its from that isnt the 2010s aged like shit

>>16531624
this was the 1st car I thought of

for something designed in 2000 its amazing how "new" it still looks

File: 2008protonpersona008.jpg (222KB, 1280x856px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1280x856px

>>16531504
>This car was released in 2008

>>16533376
Those look dated though.

File: 1482030918374.jpg (47KB, 480x555px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 480x555px

>>16533707
>All Commodores look like shit though,
t. ford

File: Porsche-911_Turbo_(996)_mp42_pic_8444.jpg (203KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1600x1200px

>>16531624
Poor Bangle got so much shit for that car

>>16531634
Still the only good looking VW

>>16531504
looks like shit

File: 211-1024x625[1].jpg (160KB, 1024x625px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1024x625px

>>16531504

>>16531535
>popup headlights
>jellybean aesthetic

nice two door taurus nigger

>>16532972
its got the face of a shitbox desu

>>16533851
sorry bug eyes have been abandoned by most if not all car manufacturers.

Same for the stupid fitment

File: Bentley-Continental-GT-(9).jpg (49KB, 730x480px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 730x480px

You can literally break necks in poorer areas of the country with a 2003 vag shitbox

>>16533777
Trips uhf trooth

File: IMG_1596_zps4334fcd5.jpg (110KB, 1024x682px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1024x682px

tbqh

>>16533656
>tfw no christmas cake waifu to wrench with you
Why live?

File: 4L_ScK2DgaF.jpg (133KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1000x667px

I love these cars I've had this for 3years fun and dependable

File: 51314616.jpg (192KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1024x768px

inherited an 09 hatchback like this one with 53k on it, finally drove it, seems like a fun little car, anything I should know?

>>16534327
K I L L Y O U R S E L F

>>16534347
Rear wheelwells rust really easily.

>>16534327
mate thats disgusting

S2000 came out in 99

also nice MS3 butt pics, because it quite is a butterface car.

BMW 5er E60, which is 2003

>>16533838
>what is the corrado

File: images (76).jpg (32KB, 470x313px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 470x313px

ez
the first one looks exactly like the last one
i guess retro styled cars in general age well,

File: AUDI-A4-1530_22.jpg (338KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 1280x960px

2000

File: LotusElise.jpg (383KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 720x480px

2001

>>16533376
this is the only proper list here, also, Porsches

>>16531504
>mazda rear lights design after RX-7
into the trash

>>16534844
even a 2 year old Audi looks dated

>>16534850
I don't know if this will ever not look like a super car

>>16531504
Mom, stop posting on /o/ and go to bed.

File: mazda-323f-photo-2-large[1].jpg (90KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1024x768px

>>16531744

File: Celica.jpg (133KB, 681x375px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 681x375px

>>16531504
1999

>>16535124
paki?

File: mazda-3-sedan_1330_8.jpg (78KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 800x533px

>>16531504
The interior didn't age that well.

File: 2009_mazda_mazda3_dashboard.jpg (39KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 640x480px

>>16535602
the upper trim packages/mazdaspeed aged a little better.

>>16533357
kek

File: 3866.jpg (2MB, 4978x2577px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4978x2577px

>>16535084
it doesn't. too small and cutesy although not as bad as the S1.

pic related looks closer

>>16532147
best reliable sports sedan ever

File: 206_1.png (150KB, 400x261px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 400x261px

behold

File: 2003_9-3.jpg (266KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 1024x768px

Posting this because it is one of the rare cars of it's decade that I find acceptable. I think that car design trends of the late 90's and 2000's were the worst and it was an awkward time for fashion in general.

>>16531547
Most of people look at it as an 80's car. Probably cause it lived thru all the 80's. Although it's 70's design and and it lived in three decades, and that's why it may be a good example here.

>>16531550
>2000's af
I'd give it to the 3 but not this one.

>>16531747
The best time of Honda designs.

>>16532187
From a sports car to a GT. I've got over it tho. I'm not into brand new cars in general anyway.

>>16534844
>2000
Learn to use google and wiki.

>>16535157
I really can't agree with you and your factory ricer.

>>16535727
>sports
Yeah, the way they handled all the rally stages..

File: 2010 Saab 9-5 Interior.jpg (283KB, 1308x872px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 1308x872px

One of the best interiors of its time. Debut in 2009.

>>16535977
>Learn to use google and wiki
it's the facelift model you tit

>>16536114
It's a 90's car and it looks like it.

>>16533003
fuck you and fuck your company that made an FF car that pretends to be MR

>>16531504
R32
R33
R34
I found three

>>16532799
>Huge
>235/40ZR18
Wew

>>16531744
lil sleepy babby

File: Pug-206-Black-008.jpg (151KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 800x600px

>>16535773
literally a 20 year old car

>>16533984
What front bumper is that?

>>16536615
An ugly one

>>16535134
Almost as cute. The Nissan was built first too.

>>16535644

I step into this every day and it doesn't get old. Going to replace the head unit eventually, but its perfect otherwise.

File: Mazda_MX-3_front_20080820[1].jpg (362KB, 1869x1005px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 1869x1005px

>>16535134

>>16532919
looks like it's wearing one of those african lip plate things

File: 54f212e43fa113b5557e0f895fa63e6d.jpg (223KB, 626x382px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 626x382px

>>16536173
Zippy little babby

>>16536662
>>16535134
The NX stomped both of these

>>16536697
but I was just posting cutes

File: jg_mintwhit.jpg (29KB, 630x353px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 630x353px

Truly timeless.

File: 1962-volvo-221-amazon-kombi-460x300.jpg (20KB, 460x300px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 460x300px

>This car was released in 1960's

>>16536886
And it looks like it comes from the 50s

>>16536895

Because it was designed in the 50's

File: 1461453937388.jpg (66KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 640x480px

I love how this thread is full of complete retards that don't understand the difference between "I subjectively think it looks good" and "aged well".

Aged well means it looks much more modern than it was.

A car with square headlights with reflectors behind them doesn't look modern nor ageless.

File: 1999_Audi_TT_20453.jpg (235KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 1280x960px

1999

File: 47637018.jpg (113KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1024x768px

>>16531504

>>16536976
God the TT is so fucking ugly
It's like they went out of their way to make it look horrible

>>16536976
nice beetle

>>16533046
They are two good features in a car, but modern safety standards prevent the design from being produced today, thus not "aging well".

>>16536922
I partly agree.
I don't think that ''modern'' will be the decisive factor here. Aged well means that it doesn't look bad only cause it isn't fresh anymore. Take a look at a car that hasn't aged well. You will recognize design trends that has lost its topicality and doesn't look good although the car seemed modern at its time. You can never predict how the mentality of people will change by the time and how will they look at something that once was up to its time.
And yes, most of people here are posting cars without analyzing if the design has actually aged well or is that they just like the car. You can't really expect top critics in a place like this.

>>16536998
2003, right? I do think that this car has aged well.

>>16537339
2003 in Japan/the rest of the world, 2005 for the US

Pontiac Aztek

>>16537378
The time of the design will be more important here. Legacy's look relatively decent.

>>16537085
>>16537092
and this is probably why it was included in the Museum for Modern Art
Myself, I think that TT is god-tier

>>16531624
winrar
also nominating E46 M3

>>16537339
Toyota Aristo

>>16537432
>I think that TT is god-tier
You didn't had to post it here only because of that.
Modern art museums are full of weird stuff. Fiat Multipla is also in that museum.

File: 1999-2001_Fiat_Multipla_01[1].jpg (680KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

680KB, 1600x1200px

>>16537478
Speaking of the Multipla, the damn thing just doesn't fit in anywhere, does it?

File: 2003-lamborghini-gallardo-0.jpg (57KB, 750x406px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 750x406px

>2003

>>16537488
It's so weird that it's actually cool. I'd buy it only for humor.

File: Subaru-Legacy-White-5285-004.jpg (365KB, 1600x1067px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 1600x1067px

>>16537415
Second gens have aged pretty well too. I get tons of compliments on mine, everyone thinks it's much newer than it actually is.

File: pontiac-solstice-2006-for-sale-wallpaper-2.jpg (260KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 1280x960px

2006

>>16537577
Looks like a facelift of a very late 80's model. Not the worst looking car tho.

>>16537598
Looks like early 2000's concept car.

File: maxresdefault-2.jpg (721KB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

721KB, 2592x1936px

>2004

File: 85666881[1].jpg (31KB, 620x400px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 620x400px

>>16537630
>2001

File: IMG_7740.jpg (907KB, 2712x1808px) Image search: [Google]

907KB, 2712x1808px

>2004

File: m1by0s8bjv5c_600.jpg (39KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 600x400px

>>16537637
>1996

(Apart from the rear though)

File: 791d3483bb1d350bb1cb6d205f2d752d.jpg (61KB, 720x478px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 720x478px

This shape will never age.

>>16537630
>fake grills
Overall it's a decent looking and well aged car.

>>16537637
>90's
Looks alright.

>>16537650
Looks like it shouldn't be newer than 2004.

>>16537677
Yeah, it won't cause it already has.

File: 1467254034185.jpg (268KB, 1920x1077px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 1920x1077px

>>16537677
timeless

>>16537744
lmao how are windshield spoilers not the hot new aftermarket trend for civics and neons?

File: $_57.jpg (379KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 1600x1200px

>>16537630
Also you've posted a facelifted model.
Here's a nicer Swedish (actually made in Sweden) estate.

>>16537744
It's a 90's car that looks 80's. I'm not saying that it doesn't look cool but it looked aged when it was new.

>>16536009
Can't unsee the ugly GM steering wheel that's in literally every single GM car nowadays.

>>16537833
>nowadays (more than seven years later)
That sure sounds like GM.

>>16537848
Lol gm used the same steering wheel for almost 40 years last time

>>16534836
FJ is a truck, not a car. Otherwise a good response.

>>16531504
As only the bespoke Morgan and Lotus examples proved to be exceptions, OP is true.

File: Ford-Mustang_GT-2005-800-19.jpg (121KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 800x600px

>>16531504

The 2005-2009 model year is still my favorite Mustang.

>>16538559
What do you like about it?
I think it's terrible.
It's trying too hard to be both safe and modern yet incredibly retro.
The interior is pretty bad as well.

File: 2016-Chevrolet-Malibu-1LT-steering-wheel[1].jpg (1MB, 2040x1360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2040x1360px

>>16537833

They have a new one.

>>16538559
You must be blind....

Best is SN-95 New Edge

File: Ford-Mustang_GT_Convertible-2005-1600-12.jpg (137KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1600x1200px

>>16538569

I like how classic/geometric it looks. There isn't a lot of tacked-on looking fine details. It's just pleasing to look at. I like that it looks like a simpler version of the original Mustang.

>>16533624
>I would never own or drive a Mitsubishi because I'm not a homosexual
I hope you get flayed you fucking piece of shit.

File: Ford-Mustang_GT_Convertible-2005-1600-17.jpg (250KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 1600x1200px

>>16538569

Although the interior materials are cheap, I like the appearance very much.

>>16538586

I like the 1999-2004 Mustang more than the previous model, but it doesn't have the sharp corner look of the 2005-2009 that I like.

>>16538586
Fuck no. I bet you're one of those fags who likes fox bodies too.

>>16532535
Came here to post this, wasn't dissapointed

File: [email protected] (531KB, 1000x588px) Image search: [Google]

531KB, 1000x588px

>>16532919
>>16536675

>>16536697
and he was just posting facts

>>16538559
Shame Mustang styling went from this back to post nu edge design angry bulbous front end that the new 'stang has.

It was my favourite looking pony car.

Id rather take the newest camaro or any of the older ones.

Fuck new fords post 2008 are so fucking hideous like they all are a Aston Martin vantage and have a goofy big mouth and tiny eyes and look all pissed off because they are always sick and breaking down

File: [email protected] (530KB, 1000x588px) Image search: [Google]

530KB, 1000x588px

>>16538740
Fixed

>>16538740
WE

>>16539222
WUZ

>>16539321
MACLAWRENCE EFF ONES

File: hqdefault.jpg (45KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 480x360px

>>16539326
N SHIET

File: 1995_Audi_TT_Concept_01[1].jpg (66KB, 800x500px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 800x500px

>>16537225
That's not how you define "ageing well" you retarded hick.

File: 0a174c28ca8df3182b2ce5487adf8b17.jpg (126KB, 553x574px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 553x574px

To say that a car has aged well is really not an look thing its more like if it were on a car lot today would you consider it still in the now for example this is an 07 id still buy it today and i feel like the could market this as a 17 model car doesnt mean i think its sexy

>>16539512
That Volvo has the same platform as OPs Mazda.

File: 2006_hummer_h2_base-pic-42874-1600x1200.jpg (79KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 640x480px

>>16531504

>>16531504
>not pictured: rust

File: ori8.jpg (202KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1600x1200px

Many VWs and Audis from '90s and '00s are timeless and modern. Lowest c_w values and adequate engines.

Nowadays german OEMs have to produce shitty SUVs with even shittier engines.
Fuck consumers and middle aged woman with children.

>>16541104
that's a small school bus

>>16532978
16 years old. looks like it came off the conveyer yesterday.

S15 looks like a 2004-06ish car

>>16541199
These aged fucking horribly anon.

File: DSC00312.jpg (3MB, 6000x4000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 6000x4000px

>>16531624
>>16531720
This, LCI looks better than the f10 imho

>>16531634
I want to agree but that big wheel, A8 aged better!

>>16532535
All bimmers from this time with m sport, e39 m5, X5 e53

>>16532978
agree, db9 is better in this regard tho

>>16533116
>>16533244
my niggers

>>16533777
and the quattroporte, and the 4200gt and the 3200

>>16533851
yeee

>>16533838
turbo/c4s versions yess, other the 993 looks was better

>>16533936
agree

>>16535977
>>16536009
the newer 95 will be a timeless machine

>>16536922
my nigga, all restyled alfas(156, 166, Brera, 159, Spider are amazing, giulietta will also age very well)

I think the lancia thesis also aged fairly nicely

>>16531504

>aged well
>suspension worn out and sagging that badly
pick one

>>16533244
Why this car is loved so much when any modern JDM shitbox can outpace it easily minus the reliability issues?

File: IMG_5065.jpg (296KB, 1960x1504px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 1960x1504px

1954

File: trailblazerss.jpg (369KB, 1024x681px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 1024x681px

>>16531504

File: colorado.jpg (114KB, 575x431px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 575x431px

>>16542377

File: saab 95.jpg (72KB, 500x300px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 500x300px

>>16541590
>the newer 95 will be a timeless machine
ok

File: chrysler-grand-voyager-3.8-05.jpg (102KB, 800x480px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 800x480px

Not even sure why, but Grand Voyager of this generation still looks aesthetically pleasing and fresh to me. It's otherwise an utterly dreadful car.

Might be 'cause of riding in the back of one for hours as a teen.

>>16533984
Aged decently

>>16533640
DEVIL ZETTO

File: $_86.jpg (101KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 800x600px

>10 years old

File: 1ayy.jpg (228KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 800x600px

>>16541590
Uglier and FWD. JZ Turbo sedan aged better

File: Saab 96.jpg (173KB, 1066x803px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1066x803px

>>16542692
I want one to rally in

File: maxresdefault.jpg (158KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1200x800px

>>16543641
meh too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBHBgg3mSeU

File: DSC00344.jpg (4MB, 6000x4000px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 6000x4000px

>>16542692
9-5, you understood me

>>16543636
c'mon

>>16543636
Looks like a Corolla rebaged to a luxury sedan by Chinese. Sorry.

>>16543793
Maybe I will but I won't admit it.

>>16543623
this must be where kia got their design cues for the Optima from

>>16543829
I think I've seen Saab-Kia design comparisons in a Saab forum. I don't know Kia models that well (probably cause I don't care) but most of Korean cars usually reminds me different cars. Guess that they don't have their design legacy. They will just be happy if their cars will look ok in consumer's eye.

File: GT350-3[1].jpg (69KB, 776x470px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 776x470px

>>16538672
hey fuck off faggot fox body is
G O A T
O
A
T

sn95s look like girl cars pre-1999

>>16538559
I would've liked these a lot better if they had painted the headlight scoops the same color as the rest of the car instead of black.

File: IMG_1177.jpg (308KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 1600x900px

W140
1992

>>16531504
>wheels off a 350z

>infiniti centercaps

>MAZDA 3

>>16536256

I had to check this one out and HOLLY SHIT, it's true.

It debuted in '98. Good god, I am getting old.

>>16536807

>Boomer-mobile

Ugh.

Don't get me wrong, nothing necessarily wrong with the car itself, but...

Sigh.

>>16537085

It aged poorly but it was considered a looker back in the day. If my memory serves me right at any rate.

>>16541294
This

File: Watamote 1480457099019s.jpg (2KB, 125x123px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 125x123px

>>16541568

Disagree.

Mk I, II & IV have aged rather well IMHO,

>>16531504
Those taillights are dogshit ugly and the front end is even fucking worse. I'm so fucking glad Mazda is past using this shit for every design they make.

File: 1465449776691.gif (740KB, 300x242px) Image search: [Google]

740KB, 300x242px

>>16535157
KING OF THE FUCCBOIS

Horrible factory rice, square as fuck ass with a faggy bubbled wedge for a front end, disgusting elongated headlights also slow as fucking dogshit and fwd to match. Only thing it has going for it is it's weight.

This car is legitmately faggot spec, not just a meme faggot spec like the Miata.

>>16542004
because no modern jdm shitbox is as fun or looks as good
and it is still faster than the new civic type R so it's not that slow

>>16533209

>black plastic door handles

Who said those are plastic?

>>16533264
>Latch is always in the shade by design
>If not, the backside of the latch is not hit by the sun at all
>Manage to burn yourself anyway

Are you retarded?

File: 10155903_600247453398607_5114187783023611278_n.jpg (74KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 720x960px

Mazda 3, aged well.
Kek

File: 15894613_10155042461729236_421079777145611262_n.jpg (68KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 960x540px

>Glorious nippon steel.

File: 15844283_10155629568834128_7956260324374915965_o.jpg (106KB, 1440x810px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1440x810px

>Aging like fine swiss cheese

File: 807397732253089605.jpg (40KB, 636x358px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 636x358px

Aerodynamic holes.

>Gook engineering.

File: jeep-cherokee-2007-18[1].jpg (222KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 600x450px

>>16541104

This, along with the Grand Cherokee, I think still look very good.

File: 80878d1255278724-retro-headlight-modification-s197-img_6598-medium-[1].jpg (81KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 800x533px

>>16539028

I agree that the newer ones lost the appeal of the 2005-2009.

>>16543861

There's an aftermarket part for exactly that.

This is the only picture I could find of a Mustang with this part that wasn't totally riced out.

File: 62cc518s-960[1].jpg (137KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 960x540px

>>16545131

It's called, "Raxiom Retro Style Headlights".

They're kinda neato.

File: 2014-ford-mustang-three-quarters.jpg (2MB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1365px

>>16545131
That was such a shit attempt at retro styling, they actually did well with the facelift

>>16545205
Too bad the newest one has downs

>>16545214
Tru

File: IMG_6482.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

2003

File: Ford-Mustang_GT_Convertible-2005-1600-05.jpg (317KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 1600x1200px

>>16545205

It's a bad photo.

I like the 2013-2014 one too, but I think I still prefer the 2005-2009.

File: Ford-Mustang_GT_Convertible-2005-1600-06.jpg (271KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 1600x1200px

>>16545242

File: JS69047883.jpg (51KB, 615x409px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 615x409px

>>" shitbox of my grandfather's generation "
>not understanding the hierarchy of US builds
>not realizing just how shitty some "new cars were at the time

anon you need to stop posting my guy

>>16541590
Holy shit your taste is bad.

That's just a slightly retro front end slapped onto a generic 90s shitbox.

>>16545205
>>16545214
>>16545227
2015-2017 was the nicest looking mustang since 1969.

I guess another 46 years until Mustangs will actually look nice again.

>>16534327
hoonigan is fucking gay

File: 1999_Chrysler-300M_1999-08.jpg (327KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 1600x1200px

>>16531504
here you go. Released in 1999. Still looks like it could be brand new.

>>16532978
Sick mondeo man

>>16544181
Good bait.