>>16522605
They won't because that's the Highlander's market.
You're confusing Toyota with Jeep.
>>16522605
It's already pretty shit
>>16522640
>assmad GM fangirl detected
>>16522605
I hope they don't.
>>16522605
plz no thats how the Pajero and Cherokee died
>>16522730
Pajero has been unibody for 17 years, doesn't stop it from being one of the best offroaders on the market.
>>16522740
christ where has the time gone
>>16522730
Cherokee was always unibody buddy.
>>16522904
but most "4WDs" have front and rear
At least the XJ had live Axles
>>16522912
Yeah, that's true, but unibody isn't inherently shit for SUVs. Cherokees, Grand Cherokees, some Pathfinders, most Suzukis have all been unibody and great utes.
It's the meme "4WD that's actually AWD" that Ford started that kills them.
>>16522919
>that Ford started that kills them.
If its not RWD based its obviously going to be shit
These transverse FWD based "AWD" halaldex type crap makes me want to chew through the front driveshafts with my teeth
>>16522925
Well the first vehicle I remember claiming to be a 4WD that was actually part-time AWD was the Escape.
And in general, don't most SUVs that come as 2WD come in FWD and not RWD? Pickups come to mind
>>16522931
Nothing wrong with part time 4wd if they are RWD based
but yeah fuck ford for popularizing that meme now every 4wd/awd SUV is a turd offroad.
Toyota Hilux/F Series/FJ And Landcruiser series are the last good ones left i know of