You're thinking about buying mustang when THIS comes over and slaps your dealer on the ass. What do?
>keep in mind its got magnaride shocks and a 470hp v8
Well it defenatly looka like it has downsyndrome... i think it may just be brighter colora. Im wondering if darker colors will look better
I can't fucking wait to see the mustang in blue.
ford nailed it again.
gm BTFO
>>16502215
maybe this?
>>16502224
>i just noticed it has pilot super sports too
looks like we've got a 1le competitor
>>16502224
Definatly better. Brighter colors may exaggerate certain angles and make it look off
>>16502216
>paying $150K for a GT86 with a V8 swap
>>16502236
>competitor
it'll BTFO the 1le like everything Ford always does to gm
>mfw 2018 GT500 with 800+hp EcoBoosted Voodoo engine blows the zl1 and corvette the fuck out
>>16502252
*2019 gt500
the gt500 will be on the streets in late 2018
it's the same story with the corvette zr1
DO NOT RESPOND
KEEP B SHIT ON B
THIS TRASH IS FROM THE INFLUX OF NEWFAGS
DO NOT REPLY AT ALL
THIS THREAD WAS ALL ABOUT HOW MANY REPLIES THE OP COULD GET
NO BUMP
>>16502196
lol it looks legit retarded
>>16502252
>it'll BTFO the 1le like everything Ford always does to gm
You mean like when Ford tried to tackle the Camaro 1LE with the Mustang Track Pack?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtmku2Lw5es
>The Camaro is closer to a GTR than the Mustang is to the Camaro
>>16502298
>gm has never beaten ford at le mans
>>16502291
t. assblasted gm fangirl
this car has FAS
>>16502291
>"NO BUMP"
>didn't even sage
Been here longer than you friendo
>>16502303
>Ford lost to GM 2 years straight in Trans Am racing with Mustangs designed for the series
>>16502321
>gm literally cannot beat ford at lemans
>>16502327
>implying GM ever tried to beat Ford at LeMans
>>16502312
Why does Ford insist on styling this so closely to the new Fusion
>>16502321
what is 1970 BOSS 302?
>>16502196
invite the car salesman to fuck my gf, since in this scenario I am considering buying a mustang which makes me a cuck
>>16502196
this is a shop right?
RIGHT?
>>16502339
so you admit gm can't compete?
>>16502370
after 2 years of straight up losing to the 1968 and 1969 Camaro Z/28
>>16502388
ya just to see potential colors
>>16502386
/thread
>>16502396
There's a difference between
>"GM can't compete"
and
>"GM won't compete because they think they're above factory sponsored racing"
From the early 70's right up until the late 90's, GM had a ban on factory sponsored racing.
>>16502415
>From the early 70's
typo. early 60's