Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: shitbox volvo.jpg (67KB, 900x596px) Image search:
[Google]
67KB, 900x596px
A good friend of mine owns a 2002 Volvo S40 that he bought new. Thursday, he dropped it off at the dealership for some service (don't ask me why, I can't figure it out, either), and they gave him a loaner XC90 to drive.
We took said XC90 to lunch on Friday, and I must say, totally underwhelmed. How the fuck can Volvo have the balls to charge $50,000 for that piece of shit?
50-fucking-grand. For what?!?! Please, someone tell me, how the fuck people get it into their minds to pay $50,000 for something that's no nicer than my wife's used CR-V that I paid $3,400 for. And I'm being dead serious. It didn't ride any better, it wasn't any quieter, the seats were *worse*, and there wasn't even much more room than her CR-V.
I'm just trying to wrap my head around this.
>>
>>16453781
Engineering. And see all of those lines and curves? That's designed by a designer using special, super complicated computers and softwares. Stop asking questions and just give us your money already!
>>
>pay $50,000 for something that's no nicer than my wife's used CR-V that I paid $3,400 for
Buttmad cunt detected. Take your jealous rants elsewhere.
>>
File: 2016-Volvo-XC90.jpg (2MB, 2038x1360px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2038x1360px
>>16453781
>something that's no nicer than my wife's used CR-V that I paid $3,400 fo
Either bait or retarded
>>
I do have a problem paying $60K for something with a tiny 4-banger. It just doesn't feel right.
>>
>>16453851
I think it's both.
>>
File: 88355799-ebcb-40f0-aeeb-1af3b8798361..jpg (229KB, 2040x1360px) Image search:
[Google]
229KB, 2040x1360px
>>16453851
Looks the same.
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3