You are forced to get either a brand new Mustang, Camaro, Charger

>>16452788
Challenger.
It's my carfu.

>>16452788
Hellcat
Looks and sounds the best

Camaro because every fucking guy in the south gets a mustang except the black guys they get the challenger. Also my dad was a corvette guy so my bloodline is forced to follow.

>>16452794
>>16452798
thirded

Camaro is ugly af
Mustang is ugly
Challenger is pigfat

I guess Challenger at least its good looking for a fatass

>>16452807

fourthed

challenger and camaro are way too fat looking irl for what they are and they dont even have the same external dimensions or appearance of a full size sedan

Id choose the mustang

Mustang.
I personally love the new body style compared to the other two, the challenger is a close second though.

>>16452816
Fifthed

>>16452830
>>16452813
I agree. I can't Camaros seriously. They're seriously the most hideous cars on the road right now.

>>16452788
depends on the trim levels.
I4: Camaro
V6: Challenger GT or Camaro LT 1LE
normal V8: Camaro SS
Performance V8: Mustang GT350

>>16452788
Chall

Camaro is GM cuck shit and my bf already has a Mustang

>>16452788
im not a muscle car guy
i would pick the bottom one because of looks
not even sure which one this is and to lazy to look it up, just recognize which one the ford mustang is

>>16452856
Gaylord?

>>16452863
>its more likely that someone with a bf is gay than a grill
>welcome to /o/

>>16452872
It's the world we live in now.

>>16452788
All so ugly. I'd get the most expensive one and sell it for a Corvette if I still had to go Murican.

I like slamming into poles so I'll take the mustang.

>>16452830
Challengers were fuckhuge in the 60s and 70s though. Im glad to see they extended the truck in the newer models. Its a shame theyre squeezing shit horsepower out of a 392 tho

>>16452903
>2 of the best looking cars currently being made and a camaro
>ugly
Have fun with your 90s miata I guess.

Mustang

>more visibility and practicality than Camaro
>smaller and better handling than the Challenger
>Coyote engines pull harder the higher you rev it, which I like
>looks the best
>probably the cheapest to own

>>16452788
mustang gt
i'd get the camaro if it had bigger windows.
I can't deal with the bumpy plastic dash in the challenger.

Nissan Z

File: 1375402161905.jpg (9KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 400x400px

>>16452948
>>2 of the best looking cars currently being made

2ss gaymaro
best overall imo and the visibility isn't as awful as people say,my friend has one and i hooned it multiple times

>>16452975
boyracer weeaboo

>>16452806
Visibility is atrocious, it's the main reason they aren't as popular

>>16452788
I'll walk

File: White_Rota_Grid_Drifts_CF.jpg (71KB, 700x525px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 700x525px

Mustang because unlike the Challenger it's actually for sale here meaning not having to import it, also the Challenger is even bigger and more cumbersome; and unlike the Camaro it won't make me look like a gigantic tool.

I'd rather have something much smaller though.

>>16452975
Go ahead, but don't pretend it isn't any less pigfat or hard to see out of than a Camaro. Also accept that it is slower both in both a straight line and in the corners.

>>16452788
No idea desu. The camaro is crossplane right? Do I go for tougay ready high revving stang or old school rumble beast transformer

File: TGT Hammond Mustang.jpg (54KB, 634x423px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 634x423px

>>16452788
>independent suspension
Mustang, obviously.

File: file.png (526KB, 808x490px) Image search: [Google]

526KB, 808x490px

>challenger
>brand new
fugg you anon I want my lime green

>>16452788
Already own a hellcat. It's the most practical, and my kids beg me to drive them to school in it. Not to mention it's the best looking.

>>16452788
challenger no contest, but I like the Camaro as well. The mustangs have been butchered to hell the past few years

GT350 Mustang because of that glorious sound

>>16452976
That's an old post you're trying to quote, buddy.

>>16452888
it's a great world

>>16452788
Charger

>family-friendly daily driver muscle car

>>16452947
they weren't huge in the 70's though, they were pony cars and they look really small these days compared to anything else on the road

besides, standing next to a new challenger the bonnet came up to my waist and the bumper chin went all the way down to my ankle, its so chunky for what it is, its essentially a smaller and less useful SUV

Which of them tows the most?

>>16452947
how is 485 horsepower and 475 lb-ft shit power?

>>16452788
mustang

le ebin ecoboost

>>16452872
theres an actual fag on /o/ with an SN-95

File: Mountains.png (2MB, 1415x830px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1415x830px

>>16453026
they made them in lime green for the new ones at least.

I got my 15' in lime green but they only made it for that year.

>>16453024
Camaro has IRS friend

Mustang if GT350
Camaro if SS
Challenger if Hellcat

Otherwise, fuck no

File: 2017-chevrolet-camaro-zl1__926529_.jpg (134KB, 615x376px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 615x376px

Kinda Torn between the Camaro and Mustang. on one hand i think the mustang looks best inside and out on the other i'm just so impressed with the ZL1 that i could almost overlook the visibility flaws.

Seriously having a hard time believing they got a 3800 lb RWD car with 600+ HP to turn as well as it did. if it looked better id be its biggest fucking fan.

Mustang because its the only one with right hand drive.

Probably the camaro in a convertible.

Idk, none of them could make it down the dirt road to my house so its a moot point ha.

>>16453068
More like nigger-friendly.

No self-respecting white family patriarch drives a fucking Charger lol.

This is why True Detective season 2 sucked, so fucking unrealistic.

>>16452788
>You are forced to get a brand new
>forced to get
>forced
oh merciful me pls don't do this waahh
it'd be the mustang because I've always liked them growing up and i think it'd make a good DD. I'm not an /o/tist to shitpost about mpg's or hp, or performance for "muh track times".

>>16452806
>mah daddy bought uh chebby so i'm buyin' won too

>>16453263
did a nigger steal your bike recently?

Camaro or Challanger, I'm hoestly divided.

Probably most likely Camaro, cause I'm a GM guy.

>>16453103

Green Go is out, guys...

>>16452788
challenger with the v6 for mpgs

>>16453295

The fuck did you call me spic?

File: u-wot-m8.gif (1MB, 500x279px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 500x279px

>>16453304

u herd me fgt

File: 1312430499089.jpg (261KB, 411x611px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 411x611px

>>16453299

>mpgs

s-stop it

I think the Mustang wins aesthetically against the Camaro, hands down. The Camaro looks so generic and edgy whereas the Mustang has a pleasantly defined fastback.

Challenger is a different type of car. It's a highway king meant for comfy cruising.

>>16452788
Challenger is too pigfat
It's a toss up between the Mustang and the Camaro. Camaro has a slight edge on performance, Mustang has a slight edge on looks but it's a ford.
astonishing how good modern muscle is tbqh

Why is everyone so concerned with the Challenger being pigfat?

Why is /o/ so full of benchracers?

Challenger. Reliability be damned, I love it.

>>16452842
Sixthed

File: 2014-Ford-Shelby-GT500-front-three-quarters-in-motion[1].jpg (666KB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

666KB, 2048x1360px

The last gen pony cars were both so much better looking than the new ones.

>>16452788
Challenger > Mustang > suicide > Camaro

>>16453445

While I agree with you on the Mustang, the Camaro was always overly-styled and the previous Challenger looked... cheaper?

>>16453382
Seventhed

>>16453445
Friend of mine owns a 5.0 of this body style. intake/exhaust/93 octane tune.
thing hauls ass.
the only way he loses a race is if he cant get traction

Challenger.

It's the only real muscle car being produced by the big three today.

>>16453579
You misspelled Charger

>>16452872
everybody knows there a no girls here.

>>16452788
Challenger, but only if it's a Hellcat. Otherwise, I'll flip a coin...

File: 1263237319792.jpg (28KB, 173x154px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 173x154px

>>16453585
can you stop

>>16453579
That's because sports cars are just better.

>>16453370
You have to understand this board. It's full of memers. If it's not from the 1980s, has no popup headlights, is over 2700lbs, or has any modern amenities at all it's a piece of shit in /o/'s eyes.

>>16453370
Or maybe I just want my car to fit into my own garage.

>>16453585
The charger isn't a muscle car. It's more of a pony car than a muscle car.

It's got more in common with the Mustang than the Challenger.

>>16453613
>Have regular california sized garage
>can fit 2 cars in it

If I'm not paying for it? Mustang GT350R, if I'm paying for it? Camaro 1SS 1LE. I generally want something I can have as a DD but track on the weekend if I desire.

>>16453613
Get your "treasures" out of the garage then

File: 1278953457687.jpg (37KB, 300x366px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 300x366px

>>16453639

>wants to DD
>picks the smaller less practical cars

>>16453655
Except that smaller means more practical. It still has the same number of seats and sufficient cargo space, but being a foot shorter makes it much easier to parallel park, which outside of the United States of Walmart Space Shuttle Parking Lots is an important aspect of buying a car.

Sadly they're all the same pigfat width in the current model year. The previous gen Mustang wasn't nearly as bad, almost two inches narrower.

Challenger, its a pretty sweet cruiser

>>16453685
>United States of Walmart Space Shuttle Parking Lots
Kek

>>16452788
Charger Hellcat..
Because why not.

I hate all 3 as sportscar

Give me the Challenger for getting bitches and being comfy

>>16453685

We're sorry our cars don't fit into your mini-cooper parking spaces, Abdul.

Give the queen my regards. :^)

File: IMG_0193.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>16453299
Bitches don't know bout my miles per gallon.

>>16453685
>outside of the United States
So irrelevant for muscle cars. Gotcha senpai.

>>16453827
>>16453846
Well, apparently someone is forcing me to own one of them, and I gave the reasoning for my choice. It's not my fault I'm dragged into owning one of these impractical shitbarges.

depends

>turbo 4
boostang
>bsigs
mustang
>v8
camaro ss
>sanic v8
gt350r

>>16453853

M'yes, quite.

Would you be a dear and pass the milk for my tea?

Did you hear that Amir honor-killed his child-wife yesterday for not wearing her hijab-diaper?

File: gas gas gas.jpg (136KB, 1173x855px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1173x855px

>>16453831

>>16453478
Eighth

>>16454045
Auto v6? :-(

>>16454057
Nineth

>>16454057
>>16454215
gayth

>>16454190

30 minutes on the highway with auto v8 392.

Maybe 70% is cruise control, the rest was me blowing the doors off left lane speed monitors.

>>16454290
That's actually the one thing I don't like about my hellcat is that 6th isn't as tall as in a regular SRT, and highway fuel economy suffers tremendously.

>>16454337

You're manual, I'm assuming?

>>16454351
Yeah. The 8 speed does not have the same handicap.

>>16454370

I keep hearing the tremec six-speed is solid, but everyone says that after they've modified it, lol.

I got the A8 cause I'm a pleb and can't be arsed to learn/pay.

>>16452788
challenger because it's the closest to staying true to that old school muscle vibe, plus you can actually seat people in the back and (mostly) see out of it; compared to the other two it's a glasshouse.

>>16453135
They all have irs now

>>16452788
I already own a mustang so I would get a challenger srt 392.

>>16453019
>camaro is crossplane right?
Yes. The mustang GT is as well though.

File: fRaUvSE.gif (134KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 400x400px

Would def go for a Charger because the Stang and Camaro are a shit. A SHIT! Only real niggas drive Dodges

File: pontiac-firebird-emblem-wallpaper-wallpaper-5.jpg (158KB, 707x708px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 707x708px

>>16452788
Camaro.

Then strip it and put everything into my '85 firebirb.

CHICKEN, ARISE!

>>16453685
Mustang is just as small as the Camaro but with better visibility

Obviously a Challenger. Do I even need to say why?

>>16454881
Yes you do.

Best guess is comfort, because handling/speed/reliability aren't the reasons.

>>16452788
Challenger. Because THICC

File: 2017-Dodge-Challenger-TA-and-2017-Dodge-Charger-Daytona.jpg (1MB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1365px

WARNING: MULTI PART LONGPOST INCOMING

>>16452788
Went through this exact thing over the last few months when I was deciding on what car to buy, along with some other contenders like an M2. One thing to keep in mind is that I was looking for a daily driver out of this. Another thing to note is that I had absolutely no brand loyalty going into this; never owned a Chevy, Ford, or Dodge, nor did my family.
This is obviously largely subjective and mostly pertains to the V8s because the other trims were never in the running for me. That said, for a 4cyl I'd go Ecoboost and for V6 I'd go Camaro.

>Cons
Mustang: Interior, outdated engine/no DI, ability to put power down stock, Sync is garbage, maintenance costs on par with BMWs for some reason, image (by image I mean the association these cars have, for example around here there's a squad of about ten 18-24 retards that race up and down the highway so Mustangs get more attention from cops and Mustang drivers are generally looked at as douchebags)
Camaro: exterior styling, price, visibility, no HD radio, gas mileage with 8 cylinders engaged (see pros), difficult to modify, preciseness takes some fun out of the drive (see pros), it's not an LT4
Charger: reliability issues, transmission, tie rod devourer, cheap interior, weight/literally a boat, image. After talking to some cops and the department fleet mechanics, there was no way in hell.
Challenger: drivability/handling, weight, interior left a lot to be desired, Dodge needs to do a lot of work to catch Ford/Chevy's new generation which they won't even attempt until at least 2020

File: muh_track.jpg (353KB, 805x829px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 805x829px

>>16454936

>Pros
Mustang: Dat S550 exterior, finally has IRS, handles considerably better than previous Mustangs, just straight up fun to drive, easily modifiable and great aftermarket support, price, adaptive cruise, 3.55 diff from the factory
Camaro: By far the nicest interior of the lot... feels like being in a jet, HUD, the handling was incredible (especially compared to how I thought it was going to feel based on how the car looked), extremely precise and stable, variable displacement/gas mileage when taking advantage of the variable displacement, power to weight, more power than the Mustang and better at putting it down (it's pretty hard to slip the back wheels especially running them with slightly lower PSI), brakes, probably the best overall performance of the bunch, and of course, the Magnetic Ride suspension.
Charger: 4 doors (for me), uhh.. I dunno I'm really struggling here. One plus for me was the power specifically compared to other sedans, but when comparing it to the coupes that doesn't really fly.
Challenger: price, power to weight (kind of negates the price advantage because of the needed package), exterior modern but retro look

As you can probably tell, the Dodges got ruled out pretty quickly, even though I would have preferred a sedan. At the end of the day it came down to the Camaro and Mustang. Now I went a bit further than most people get to when testing a car, partly because of the relationships I had with the sales people at each dealership and partly because I have access to the closest thing to a private track without it actually being a track (pic related & can elaborate if interested in what types of testing I put these cars through).

>>16453263
You have the Charger confused with the Chrysler 300. They're pretty much the same car, but it's the 300 that's the black favored car, hands down. Whites prefer the Charger.

>>16452788
black camaro convertible with the automatic transmission and paddle shifters, cruise and chill man

File: 823a50f6_o.png (1MB, 700x670px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 700x670px

>>16454953

The Camaro and Mustang both handled beautifully, the biggest difference I noticed came in high speed cornering. The Camaro was incredibly precise and absolutely bolted to the ground, point the car where you want it to go and it goes. The relationship between the suspension and the brakes is fantastic, and shifting the pitch and balance of the car was super easy. However, that is exactly why the Mustang is more fun to drive. It doesn't corner as well, it's shakier in almost every aspect, it has more roll, and it needs constant driver input and slight corrections to get it to go where you want it, you feel like if you fuck it up you're going into a tree or ditch, but that's exactly why it's entertaining.

I absolutely love the way the S550 looks from the outside, but the interior is extremely disappointing. It's not the shitty Mustang interiors of old (e.g. < 2005) but it still felt like Ford put in no effort to improve it. Other than the general look of it, I had to major gripes with the interior and that was the placement of the handbrake (raised, and right where I put my arm to have it on the shifter), and the unnecessary curve on the footwell trim area right where I keep my right knee. (pic related)

File: 1471474762242.jpg (1MB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1360px

>>16454963

The Camaro always looked gaudy to me from the exterior so I couldn't even see myself in it before I drove one. Thankfully, the 6th gen looks much better than the 5th gen to me, the design changes weren't huge, but the effect is major. Also, Camaros have an odd way of looking completely different based on the color. The non metallic colors just look bland and dated and don't showcase the design lines as well as colors like Nightfall Gray Metallic, Hyper Blue Metallic, Arctic Blue Metallic, or either of the Blacks. DO NOT get this car in White, Yellow, or Red (Garnet Red Tintcoat is fine). As I've mentioned before, the interior absolutely blew me away. If I want to nitpick, the only issues I managed to come up with was that the seats/mirrors have to be set almost perfectly for visibility to not be an issue, the air vents rattle a little bit on occasion, the HUD can't be projected as high on the window as I'd like, the center console is useless made worse by there already being a lack of places to put things like phones or glasses cases, the wireless charging dock is too small for my iPhone 6s Plus, and the latch that holds the folding back seat is tough to engage. All pretty minor, and not all better in the other cars.

Evidently, as I was trying to judge the cars, Interior, Exterior, and Performance/Handling became the 3 primarily contested points. The Camaro won one handily, the Mustang had the edge on the other, and they were pretty even on the final frontier.
The way I had the cars spec'd out, the Mustang came in about $6000 cheaper than the Camaro based on MSRP (the higher price on the Camaro left me more wiggle room to negotiate though, which made the true difference probably closer to about $4500-5000), but lacked a lot of the options the Camaro came with. Most importantly, the Magnetic Ride suspension; this alone was worth the price difference to me. Other things included better brakes, exhaust, sunroof, audio, and some other more minor things.

File: chevrolet-camaro-50th-anniversary-edition-4096x2731-black-speed-11462.jpg (2MB, 4096x2731px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4096x2731px

>>16454971
Ultimately I decided on the Camaro, a 2SS 50th Anniversary Edition to be exact, over a California Special Mustang GT Premium. It's hard to go wrong with either car though.
The deciding factors probably came down to the interior being more important than the exterior to me and the Magnetic Ride, I seriously cannot overstate how amazing that suspension is. My concerns with the exterior looks of the Camaro were mitigated by the changes that were made for the new generation and the color scheme I picked, and a few other appearance options on it. The more I drive it, the more satisfied I am with my decision, though that could just be confirmation bias and post purchase rationalization. No matter, I'm happy with it.

For fun, if we're talking high performance models of the same cars, I'd take a new ZL1 with the 10 speed auto no question 100 times out of 10. I'm excited to see how Ford responds, but as of now that ZL1 is a godmachine and absolutely crazy bang for buck. If the wait and allocation issues weren't as shitty as they were I would have probably gone with that but I needed something a bit more practical and needed it ASAP.

>>16453170
The mustang looks like shit on the inside, especially compared tot he new Camaro interior
>visibility flaws
set your seat and mirrors properly and there is no visibility issues on the 6th gen.
And this is coming from someone who almost wrecked twice leaving the dealership because mirrors weren't set properly (Drove off the lot at night, mirrors had been acceptable during the day so I didn't think anything of it. Bad assumption.), so I know exactly how bad the visibility *CAN* be. I'm still getting used to reversing (first car with a backup cam) and knowing exactly how far to pull into parking spots (I have a splitter so I can't just roll the front over the parking bump).

>>16454776
There's a company that takes new Camaros and turns them into Firebirds. Not really my thing and very expensive, but pretty damn cool.

>>16452788
mustang because ford guy. and #fuckyourLS challenger isnt a challenge.

>>16455000
>>16454971
>>16454963
>>16454953
>>16454936
Thanks for putting effort into a post on /o/, they are pretty rare.

I really do wish I was comfortable with the Camaro visibility, because the interior is actually pretty cool. As you said, it's like sitting in a jet fighter.

The Mustang, it looks the best.
Wouldn't look as good next to my fox Mustang though

>>16452788
>Challenger
i like it and it's a proper muscle car

>>16455023
Salty. Your sister hasn't been putting out lately?

>>16452788
Get the charger because it costs the most at 30K. Sell it and buy 30 Volvo 240s.

>>16455319
>not buying 6 Grand Marquis'

>>16452830
>challenger and camaro are way too fat looking irl for what they are
Camaro is the lightest of the 3, has the most power unless you go 392 on the challenger, and is the best at actually using that power. Your judgement doesn't fit reality, unless you actually care about it looking heavy rather than it being heavy and bad at handling...

i'd kill myself instead if those were my only options

File: M18-Hellcat.jpg (1MB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1800x1200px

>>16452798
>Hellcat
>Looks and sounds the best

Agreed.

>>16456299
The rest of the world would hope so

File: SOXSbnR.jpg (298KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 2000x1333px

Mmm

>>16456185
im never going to own these cars, so im doing it entirely out of appearance

and to me, the challenger looked like a cramped SUV, and the camaro looks like a constipated transformer, so id own a mustang because its the smallest and best looking of the three

>>16452788
Mustang all day


Camaro is ugly and the challenger is pigfat. Anybody saying the camaro is a GM fangirl or has shit taste

>>16452788
Mustang cause its the only one that comes in RHD

>>16455087
This. I've got kids. I'm not taking a car to track days any more. I just want something comfortable and relatively practical that can still throw down if need be, and the challenger fits those criteria.

File: Chevrolet-Camaro-2016-13.jpg (323KB, 1920x1158px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 1920x1158px

Hellcat certainly. GT350 in 2nd.


I couldn't drive a Camaro, the lack of windows would make me claustrophobic.

>>16452788
Hellcat.

Also, why doesn't Dodge offer a Shaker Hellcat?

>>16452788
Challenger, if I'm going pig fat, it better have a drive train to match.

Tally so far:
>Challenger: 26 (including ''Hellcat'' without specifying Challenger or Charger)
>Mustang: 18
>Camaro: 5
>Charger: 4

Special variants:
>Hellcat: 6
>GT350: 4

>>16453585
>4 doors
>muscle car
No.

>>16453619
>4 doors
>pony car
No.

>>16456967
im quite fuckin relieved that we don't have those blindboxes in aus. Jesus christ, how the fuck do you even.

File: 1483460483590.jpg (58KB, 520x468px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 520x468px

>unironically wanting this

Just give me the Hellcat. I'll wrap it around a pole and put the engine in my Jeep and go murder dunes with it.

>>16452861

That's the challenger, anon.

I'd just pick the most expensive one and sell it, I ain't driving those pigfats.

I absolutely love my charger and it's been reliable as hell but if I had to pick between the other two, I'd go with the camaro

File: 1459060041264.png (519KB, 876x624px) Image search: [Google]

519KB, 876x624px

>>16457113

File: 2016-chevrolet-ss-inline1-photo-669589-s-original.jpg (77KB, 624x381px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 624x381px

If you threw the charger in, why not also throw in the SS? I'd deff pic this over a charger or challenger.

File: mfw.gif (8KB, 86x86px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 86x86px

>>16457113
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBmrXqMBGf0

>>16457107
>having to see anything that's not right in front of you

no wonder you're not american

File: Focus1.png (858KB, 720x669px) Image search: [Google]

858KB, 720x669px

>>16452788
The blue one coz i like blue

In order of want

GT350 > Hellcat > ZL1 > SS 1LE > GT > 392 SRT > V6 1LE > R/T > Ecoboost > V6 Stang > I4 Camaro > SXT

File: grpcrx7.jpg (627KB, 1024x704px) Image search: [Google]

627KB, 1024x704px

Probably the Mustang.

More so if i can walk it down the line so I can tell them to only put in basic shit.. Which means I just want a the bare shell with 5.0 and 6spd drive line. No interior, windows, bumpers or lights and all the bits and pieces that go with that.

pic unrelated and sort of related. Would just want to use it to build a Group C style race car.

File: jilltrunkchallenger-624x468.jpg (87KB, 624x468px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 624x468px

>>16457113
>unironically not wanting this

Challenger.

Camaro is the loser car and the Mustang is for cucks and girls who buy the base.

File: _y8TCZBJ-Sg.jpg (58KB, 500x561px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 500x561px

>>16452788
I'd fucking kill myself im dealership!

File: FB_IMG_1482400729238.jpg (12KB, 575x575px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 575x575px

>>16453071
What are you talking about? The only thing modern cars have is fat thanks to modern safety shite

>>16457819
>Airbags weigh a thousand pounds

>>16457825
>twenty airbags each weighing 20 pounds don't weigh 400 pounds
>airbags are enough to meet modern safety standards
>airbags include all the mandatory sensors
>airbags provide pedestrian protection
>airbags provide protection small overlap crashes

Charger SXT AWD with Rallye package

fuck the police

>>16452842
>>16453382
>>16453478
>>16454057
>>16454215
>>16454220
fucking redditors

>>16457835
Modern cars are shaped differently and such because of modern safety (Crash impacts)

Challenger definitely. A new car would be something I could drive year round, get the big comfy one that looks the best.

File: IMGP0463-1038x576.jpg (145KB, 1038x576px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1038x576px

>>16456341
More like this.

>>16453480

>93 octane tune

Challenger Hellcat with patrician manual gearbox

I'd get a challenger 392 or r/t 5.7 with the six speed in blue or black or orange.

Such a great looking car, comfy cruiser and still fun to hustle around. Loads of torque as well

>>16453006
Feels on that import issue. Commie VF2 SSV Red master race though.

>Charger Hellcat
>C7 Corvette GS

>>16458312
>it's a "european doesn't know the difference between AKI and RON octane ratings" episode

>>16452788
Its like the Camaro gets worse over time.

File: pig who cried wee wee wee all the way home.gif (467KB, 500x360px) Image search: [Google]

467KB, 500x360px

I'm planning on picking up a 1LE SS Camaro

Hard to deny that level or engineering at that price

as a weekend car not meant to be my daily driver there are very few drawbacks in my opinion

>>16457065
You definitely missed some ZL1s in your tally. Also, including Hellcats in your tally for challengers is dumb because buying a base challenger because the hellcat got more votes and vice versa is comparing apples to oranges.

Now for fun, go back and tally only the responses that provided a coherent reason for the choice and ignore the "mustang because gm is for cucks" posts
There's some surprisingly good posts in this thread and it would be a shame to give the shitposts equal credibility

>>16452788
OP, you should really specify which trims are in the running and especially if you aren't considering the high performance variants like the Hellcat, Shelby, and ZL1 considering how many people in this thread have thrown out their votes based on one of those models rather than the base models

File: 1393601242295.jpg (105KB, 800x552px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 800x552px

>>16457977

reddithdded

File: 1471316795517.jpg (38KB, 567x523px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 567x523px

>>16453203
>actually being European on the internet
Wew lad

Charger
>understated, not flashy
>engine still has some balls to it
>doesn't make people assume you have a small dick

>>16459074
>>doesn't make people assume you have a small dick
People don't need to assume, they know.

File: 33EI8hMa-4342511052.jpg (747KB, 1697x1164px) Image search: [Google]

747KB, 1697x1164px

>why
0 percent interest and 33k for a manual premium GT, that's why.

>>16452788
Camaro. Love the car and can't get one normally in my country.

Challenger SXT V6

Muh gas
Muh looks the best
Muh it's fast enough go kys v8 cucks

>>16452788
the new ss camaro is pretty nice my friend has one and it keeps up with my other friends 911

>>16452788
Mustang. It's the bottom shelf whisky of the car world. No one's gonna be impressed, it's not gonna feel good, you might get made fun of, BUT you can sure have a great time.

>>16461485
>>Muh gas
You're only getting 5 MPG combined more than a V8. Still quite the gasshog at 25 MPG combined, but that's the weight.
>>Muh looks the best
Looks identical to the V8 R/T (which I'll admit it looks better than the Scap Pack/392/Hellcat).
>>Muh it's fast enough go kys v8 cucks
>calling people cucks while wanting a 4000+lbs landyacht powered by a measly V6
Kys.

Challenger because i'm not a cuck faggot.

>>16463478
Didnt read kys salty v8 fag BTFO out my car is better than yours you beta bitch boi BTFO GTFO KYS BTFO out

>>16459349
>0% interest

Fucking buying one right now

Doesn't the Challenger have terrible visibility too? I don't even think the Mustang is that good.

>>16452997
try talkin shit to me in the touge son

>>16452788
Challenger because the Charger has too many doors, because the Mustang is a Mustang, and because I like to be able to see where the fuck Im going while I drive.

Alternatively, I take whichever has the highest price tag and just fucking sell it. Pay off my FT86 and slap a supercharged LS engine into it so I can run circles around those other overpriced shitboxes.

>>16455026
My pleasure, lad. I was meaning to do a write up anyway so I'll just use my posts in this thread as a base.
>I really do wish I was comfortable with the Camaro visibility, because the interior is actually pretty cool.
Have you actually test driven one yet? I'd recommend you do so before ruling it out based on that because it was also a big concern for me going in, but by the time I was done test driving it I had gotten used to it and felt comfortable enough with it to feel like it wouldn't be a problem for me. After driving it for the past 2 weeks I've gotten even more used to it.
Also, I specifically tested the Mustang first (same day) so I'd have a fresh comparison of the visibilities and know exactly how much worse the Camaro's visibility was than the Mustang's (not that much worse btw).

>>16464502
With current generations, they all have pretty similar visibility. A lot of the "Camaro can't see shit" meme is from gen 5, still probably the worst of the 3 in terms of visibility, but it's not nearly as bad as all these memeing chucklefucks make it out to be. It was my biggest concern before I bought mine with how much the lack of visibility was discussed, but nah, not even close to that bad.
In fact, the biggest problem with small windows is reaching out of it (at drive thrus for example) if you also like to keep your seat low because your shoulder joint will be slightly below the window line.

Mustang, Hellcat if it was the Charger because the Challenger is pigfatto especially for a 2 door

>>16452788
Charger
four doors more whores

Mustang. Camaro is ugly and can't see, Challenger is pigfat and hideous.

>>16452788
I much prefer Dodge's offerings to the others. Would have to opt for Charger though. Challenger is just too fat.

On a side note...

Anyone else notice how difficult it is to find a used Charger R/T that wasn't a rental? Frustrating.

File: 2016_chevrolet_camaro-pic-3125048419489573962-1600x1200[1].jpg (489KB, 1500x919px) Image search: [Google]

489KB, 1500x919px

>>16452788
camaro because it's the sexiest

>>16452788
I'll take the hellcat.

File: 754.gif (436KB, 424x239px) Image search: [Google]

436KB, 424x239px

>>16464966

>>16464788
>challenger is hideous

>mustang driver

Lmao get aa load of this GAYWAD kek

I dunno, what's the difference?

File: doggered.png (254KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 480x480px

>>16464966

ZL1 is a best

>>16452788

>New

I currently drive an '05 Mustang. Looks beautiful, women love it, and it drives pretty damn well for an auto. The new ones are all too round for my taste, but I'd probably get another Mustang since I know they drive well. Camaros look like shit, and Challenger is "literally who?" the car.

File: 2017-camaro-zl1-spotted-in-the-wild-ahead-of-today-s-official-pricing-release-110202_1.jpg (177KB, 1300x975px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 1300x975px

>>16464966
The Camaro is ugly as sin in flat colors like that. You can improve the look if you go for a metallic paint though.

File: 1338360068703.jpg (93KB, 570x520px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 570x520px

>>16466263
I don't like how they positioned the ZL1 badge, it looks like they couldn't figure out what works well especially the front end design. It's like looking at a woman with a nice body in the back but until you see the front of h-......

>>16466263

Ew, that shit looks like a tube of lipstick with wheels.

>>16452872
>girls on the internet
>girls on 4chan
>girls on /o/
>girls owning pony cars

Kill yourself

File: 1476350434512.jpg (31KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 600x600px

Europoor here. I've never seen a muscle car before. What do they drive like? How big are they? They look big.

I think I'd take the Challenger since it looks the best.

>>16466460
It's all about the driving experience. They're fast, light but heavy enough to drive on the highway at top speeds without blowing away, low to the ground allowing you to take turns like a champ.

Lots of fun

File: 1461645939453.jpg (53KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 500x667px

>>16465422
I don't drive a Mustang but its simply better than the Challenger

Challenger is based. I would also accept the turbocharged Rustang variant (and possibly turbo Camaro variant).

Challenger pros:
>Looks the best
>Sounds the best
>Most displacement
>Comfy highway cruiser

Challenger cons
>Weighs more than the death star
>Weighs more than two death stars
>Weird belt line, sills when compared to original
>Giant pigfat torquebeast on 20" high performance tires = enjoy spending $3k+/year on tires lel

>>16467366
8th gen Civic... EX?

>>16467448
Has anyone tried putting smaller wheels and fat meats on a new challenger or does the brakes not allow it?

>>16467466

I'm not sure but my friend has an R/T (2010ish IIRC) with stock 20" wheels and the brakes looked to me to be simply too big to fit behind my 17" wheels properly. According to a quick google it looks like some people manage to fit drag wheels (skinnies up front) but mostly the sites seem to say 20x9" minimum to fit over SRT Brembos

>>16452788
Hellcat for my dad

Camaro is bestest **performance**. Closer to sportscar than the others.

The SS rapes the others in its class

The ZL1 will rape hardcore because the SS is already close to gt350 performance.

>tfw no lowered metallic grey Challenger on deep dish Japshit wheels with fat white letter tires, a blackout hood, hood pins, and black louvers
>tfw no 6.4L turbocharged SRT392
>tfw you will never combine the best parts of Japshit and Ameritrash tuning in one fat sexy beast of a machine

feels bad man

(Like pic related, but not stanceshit)

File: slammed challenger.jpg (164KB, 1365x767px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1365x767px

>>16467638

fuck I'm too high

>>16452788
either the hellcat chally or the new AWD R/T chally.

>>16452806
>Camaro because every fucking guy in the south gets a mustang except the black guys they get the challenger. Also my dad was a corvette guy so my bloodline is forced to follow.
As a guy in the south, this is true.
I drive a 'stang.

>>16454936
>maintenance costs on par with BMWs for some reason
For real?

>>16452788
Charger just because I see more of them around so it's likelier I can get parts/service probably

if there's so many of them around in comparison to other modern muscle, there must be some kind of support structure in place to keep them from melting

>>16467366
Wrong

>>16467366
your literaly retarded

File: image.jpg (197KB, 960x600px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 960x600px

Charger. I'm tall and need to fit myself and my hockey equipment in the car. Can't do that in a mustang/camaro

>>16466284
Eww, who touches the sides of the toilet like that?

>>16466284
Nothing works well with that camaro's front end design. GM just wanted it to look excessively angry and vented. It's like they just took the modern lexus nose philosophy and cranked it to 11, absolutely disgusting.

Challenger.

Mustang is a high school girls car and Camaros are a poor man's Corvette.

>>16453039
100% this. shelby gt 350r destroys the other two imo. gimmie dat flatplane crank.

>>16468297
I think your opinion is wrong

>>16468297
Fucking this

>>16468307
Kys btfo nigger

>>16468313
Wow that was rude. Please stop being so vitriolic, this is a Christian board

>>16468306
And the Corvette destroys the 350r. gtfo ford shitter lol

>>16468306
EL OH EL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHOPKhdYWpg

Camaro is the best driver's car, but I'd still have the Challenger

>>16468318
no f u homo haha

>>16468325
nigga, you're driving in a death trap full of blind spots. How is it the "best driver's car"?

GT350R.

Literally no contest.

>>16452788
Chebby because it depreciates ok

>>16468319
not one of the options, dipshinto

>>16468322
what is this supposed to prove?

>>16468347
>not one of the options
>You are forced to get either a brand new Mustang, Camaro, Charger or Challenger
>pick is a Cobra
LOL Ford shitters can't read.

>>16453685
If I need to go somewhere where I might have to parallel park I take the motorcycle

If I need to carry something huge from such a place I pay for it to be delivered by someone with a proper van

It's nice not being poor :^)

>>16468355
it's a mustang. the corvette isn't a camaro. how are you this retarded?

>>16452788
Challenger.

Then sell it and buy a Snek

>>16467687
My shop gets a ton of mustangs in. Part of that is how common they are around here but they are higher upkeep than you'd expect. It pretty much negates the price advantage it has over a Camaro imo.
Also keep in mind there's not enough data to tell how S550s are truly stacking up (same for Alpha platform Camaros) over time but so far it looks like that trend is holding.

File: lamigra.jpg (133KB, 736x507px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 736x507px

>>16452788
>charger
>in white
>with a big ass green boso stripe down the side
>basically this

>>16468358
I get the delivery thing because it's moronic to own a huge pickup for one or two mentionworthy transports a year, but aren't you basically admitting that you suck at parallel parking and are scared of it?

>>16468712
>tfw I will never step on the pedal and risk sliding into the brush and cactus on the dirt road while looking for Lopez, Rodriguez, Hernandez, and Fernadez

Why even continue to live?

>>16452788
Silverado

>>16452788
Challenger, it looks badass and has power to boot

>>16452842
>Filthed
FTFY

>>16466458
>implying pony cars weren't created for women to begin with

File: smiling.jpg (43KB, 510x450px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 510x450px

>>16467456
2003 Subaru Outback