If given the choice, would you take a third gen prelude

File: 13277582_1758389964374164_1015883869_n.jpg?ig_cache_key=MTI1NzYzNjk0OTAxNzA2NzA4Ng%3D%3D.2.jpg (83KB, 750x497px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 750x497px

Lude

File: 007.jpg (35KB, 500x321px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 500x321px

The Celica for the AWD because fun and the liftback because I regularly have to carry my bicycle around.

Apart from the superior liftback even if you want a useless coupe the Celica's got you covered.

File: honda-prelude-inx-si-02[1].jpg (145KB, 1000x637px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1000x637px

>>16449865
This

Tough choice, either would be good. Prefer the looks of the celica

Celica all the way

File: IMG_1496.jpg (94KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 800x533px

Unless the cellica is the st165 version prelude senpai, just look at it

File: CelicaGT4.jpg (198KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 960x720px

>>16449876
Celica All Trac and the Highest trim prelude aren't even in the same class lel

also you posted a n/a FWD celica.

pic related is a turbo AWD celica

>>16449841
Neither. I'd get a manual legend coupe

>>16451034
I was using a photo of the coupe to demonstrate that a Celica coupe was available.

>>16449841
That's a hard choice. I had a 3rd gen lude for a while. It's great considering its from 1988 and has all modern features you want (seat memory, adjustable bolsters, power mirrors, power sunroof, ac).

If you can get the 4WS, go for it. Otherwise the Celica is perfectly fine too.

>>16449876
These two cars aren't at all comparable though like >>16451034 said.

There were less than 2,000 in the US and is a badass homologation car. The Prelude and standard Celica are basic sporty commuter cars.

Personally, if it's not an All-trac, I'll take the Prelude because I already have a third gen Celica.