anybody hear drive an mk2 supra? what's it like compared

It's older, slower, less safe, gets worse gas mileage, and will cost more in repairs yearly.

>>16441187
Looks gud tho

>>16441199
Can't argue with that. That may actually trump all the negatives.

They are slower then they look/should be
When you drive hard you can feel the car wants to go faster- it keeps its speed well in corners and never loses grip.

But the measly 150 hp is depressingly slow to put the power down

File: mk3supra1.jpg (68KB, 1024x446px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 1024x446px

>>16441221
To be fair, the mk3 looks pretty good too. It's just a tiny bit too busy compared to the mk2.

>>16441264
no