Ford just Justed themselves. Ecoboost, more like EcoPoops

FORD STAY BTFO

>>16440236
>buy $200,000 car
>cant afford gas
¿

>>16440263
>ecoboost
>eco
>eco= environmental

>>16440302
Its clealy not eco = economic

My 1.6 EcoBoob is pretty good, but I won't pretend it's any better than a 5.0 V8

Turbos have no business on anything that isn't a sport trim econobox (which don't have room for large engines)

File: 1482880374944.jpg (119KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1024x768px

will they ever recover?

>>16440236
How can they make a smaller engine, with more gears, and an automatic transmission, in a lighter chassis, worse than an 8L V10 manual?

>>16440302
>>16440309
Both, actually. The Eco in Ecoboost signifies both ecoligical and ecomical iirc.

>>16440323
How do you make something better than an 8.4L V10 though?

>>16440323
>The Eco in Ecoboost signifies both ecoligical and ecomical iirc
Not based any any car they have sold yet.

>>16440328
An 8.5L V10 or 8.4L V12 come to mind. A 72 degree bank angle might help as well, as would the 3rd gen Hemi heads.

>>16440236
There's already a thread that is equally low traffic about this >>16439736. Unless you are a falseflagger. Then fuck you.

And the mileage is probably shit because of antilag that I'm sure you cannot turn off because the ford guys are geniuses. It keeps the turbo spinning and it needs to constantly pump more fuel. You will probably consume fuel while you're coasting on downhill with it probably.

So much for the economic part of ecoboost.

File: Lel+_cefde7ba476a1ee72b4aa9d7cbc77874.png (19KB, 167x200px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 167x200px

>>16440706
>gm fangrils ran out of arguments so they stoop this low

How can they ever recover?

>>16440236
>he made this thread again
LOL RX-7 HAS SHIT FUEL EFFECIENCY TOO WHY WOULD ANYONE WANT TO BUY IT RIGHT

>>16440706
Now, if only Ford could actually post some laptimes or hp numbers on the GT, and we could actually have a discussion here.

>>16440731
The RX-7 has some problems, among which is fuel consumption, that do not make it a sane purchase for non-enthousiasts, and a dubious choice for anyone who actually wants to drive their car.

>>16440746
this.

>>16440236
10/10