Lincoln is working on 2 new vehicles, one is supposedly a Lincoln mustang
Would you a lincolnstang?
>>16407019
I would drive that in 15 years because it would be cheaper than the mustang. It's pretty ugly.
I'll consider it if they let a Japanese car company design and build it
Otherwise it's just another shitty burgerking car
that render is like 3 years old
>>16407057
Yes, but the 2 new vehicles is recent knowledge
>>16407019
Lincoln Mustang? You mean a Thunderbird? They have shared the same platform before.
>>16407019
>Weighing down an already pigfat muscle car with "Luxury" options/trim
>>16407068
where
havent seen a single drop of news other than the Continental
>>16407073
a Thunderbird is still Ford
Lincoln had the Mark VII on the fox platform tho
>>16407122
It's called a Grand Touring car, you pleb.
>EVERYTHING HAS TO COMPETE IN THE HURRDURRING OR IT ISNT A CAR
>>16407132
What grand touring options is the Lincoln going to give you that a top trim mustang doesn't have?
Fake wood trim? Massaging seats? Self driving options? Extra back up cameras?
This abomination will get killed in 4 years tops.
>>16407122
>yuropoors trying to understand personal luxury when 5 of them share a 1.0L shitbox
>>16407174
You are some kind of fucking stupid.
>>16407019
I'd much rather have the superior Mercury rebodied Mustang.
>>16407232
Euros will never understand luxury until they pilot a landship down the boulevard.
>>16407174
LMAO I saw that car on some dude that I know's snapchat story and he actually thought it was some sort of antique rolls royce or something when he saw it in the gym parking lot
>>16407039
>Muh Japanese
Ford has been building some good cars the last decade.
>>16407288
American here
euro does luxury better and always has
>>16407306
>American here
Doubt.pizza
>>16407315
ever since the beginning son
>>16407019
I kind of like it.
>>16407019
It's about time Ford made a luxury sport coupe to compete with the CTS-V
>>16407335
Small euroshitbox like always.
Make way for true class
>it has color
>3 FUCKING SEATS, WHO ARE YOU, JOHN ROCKEFELLER?
>>16407356
that car is 10 years newer and the seats still look worse
doesnt even have doors lmao no top either
meanwhile the same year in Europe
>>16407378
>doors
A hindrance.
Wow look at that lack of color.
>>16407296
No you didn't
>>16407393
yeah its fun being able to be yanked out of your car and being open to all of the elements just look at the sorry excuse of a windscreen on that American motorized rollingham
>Wow look at that lack of color.
why would you want a rainbow luxury car monochromatic colors are the best
have this anyway
>>16407410
Wow bro not cool
>>16407299
...
Because they took designs from Mazda a decade ago.
>>16407409
no you
>Mercury died for this
Fuck this gay Earth.
>>16407039
ford just copies whatever brits come up with. aston martin grilles for the ford cars, range rover for the ford suvs, and jaguars for the lincolns.
>>16407784
>ford just copies whatever brits come up with. aston martin grilles for the ford cars
The Mustang came first, bong.
>>16407784
Wow, It's like Ford used to own Land Rover and Jaguars, and used some of the designers to design their some of their current cars, huh, really makes you think.
>>16407800
Amazing how much that looks like.
Why isn't there an American equivalent to Rolls-Royce or Bentley? And by that I mean in terms of luxury cachet and the amenities they include to make them luxury, not high-end cars that just share a platform with a lower-end brand.
Like, you'd think that something made with, I dunno, West Coast sequoia, Amish leather interior, and Amish coach-building could be marketed for $150k+ or something.
>>16408056
You used to have Chrysler, Cadillac and Lincoln, and they kinda did that high-end luxury thing up to the mid-60's. Duesenberg and Packard are up there too. You could consider the Grand Wagoneer to be a sort of proto-Range Rover, but that's nothing like Rolls or Bentley.
>not high-end cars that just share a platform with a lower-end brand.
Rolls Royces are mostly built on the BMW 7er platform, Continental's are built on the A8/Pheaton platform (D3 I believe)
>>16408056
Do the amish even believe in vehicular contraptions of the devil?
>>16408099
Yes for business, but they won't drive them.
They'll hire someone else to drive it.
>>16408010
Somehow managed to be so much fucking heavier despite being almost the same car.
How does britland manage to make a 4000 pound Mustang?
>>16407174
>What grand touring options is the Lincoln going to give you that a top trim mustang doesn't have?
A decent interior?
>>16408079
>Rolls Royces are mostly built on the BMW 7er platform, Continental's are built on the A8/Pheaton platform (D3 I believe)
That's what I meant by not in the sense. Like, you see some modern luxury cars just being built on other GM or Ford platforms and selling for under $150k fully loaded. The only actual in-production car above that $150k I can think of is the Tesla.
>>16408744
>>16408099
I mean, just hire the Amish coach builders to, you know, use coach-building skills to make nice interiors and such. They'd do that work without any problems, as long as they themselves don't drive. Their faith doesn't preach against technology as a whole, just that they can't use it.
>>16408056
This?
>>16409257
>Lucid
>>16407019
Random ass render or no, this actually looks very fucking good.
>>16409257
And this looks like an Accord
>>16407019
can someone just make pic related pls
>>16407784
AND FORD HAS LITERALLY BOUGHT AND SOLD ALL OF THEM KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK