2014 Mustang 5.0 or 2007 GT500? I do not want IRS and I

>>16399137
5.0

anyone?

>>16399137
>I do not want IRS
why?

>>16399248
If he was making it a drag car, it would make sense. Considering how heavy the new ones are, you wouldn't.

I have no clue.

File: 2015-12-12_16-26-27.jpg (338KB, 2400x1600px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 2400x1600px

>>16399255
If it was a drag car project, I could see it. Any other answer is retarded.

Either way, the 5.0. At least that way, you can use the cylinder heads from the new Voodoo V8.

>>16399248
>>16399255

because i didn't want to field questions on why i don't want a new mustang

as of now i'm leaning towards the 2014, plus there's no boomer tax on them

>>16399270
>because i didn't want to field questions on why i don't want a new mustang
1999-2004 Mustang Cobra's had IRS.

>>16399277

and they've all been beat on like impoverished white kids

>>16399282
question. Why not a 2010-2015 Camaro? They have IRS, they're just as fast and they handle much better than even the new Mustangs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTJPDurLEKw

I could understand being a Ford guy, but the LS engines just keep proving themselves time and time again.

>>16399300

because i enjoy how the mustang drives

now it's just deciding between the two models

>>16399312
fair enough. I suppose the Camaro is a bit too composed for you then.

2014 5.0.

>>16399324

and the camaro is 200 lbs heavier

which is a lot when it's not putting out any more horsepower, and when i spend a lot of my time on curvy mountain roads

>>16399137
Get the Shelby, I have a 4.6, and with a blower, it's no slouch. Now, this might just be me, but I'm not crazy about the 2010 face-lifted cars. The Shelby is the more unique of the two, it looks better, and I'd be willing to bet that it'll hold it's value better than the 5.0 S197s.

>>16399338
But the lower weight of the Mustang offers ZERO benefits. The Camaro may be heavier, but it is worlds better to drive on curvy mountain roads.
>but muh weight
stuff it. The Camaro is a better handling car, particularly 2012-2015 models which got an updated rear suspension.
When equipped with equivalent track packs, the Camaro is THREE seconds a lap faster which puts it in a completely different performance league.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtmku2Lw5es

The weight advantage of the Mustang was never utilized the way it should've been. It's a wayward handling bastard that tries to kill you around corners while the Camaro is a study in control.

>>16399137

Because all the easier to skid out and hit you with, my dear!

>>16399361
Get a Watts-Link for the Mustang and a few other parts from Griggs Racing, and watch it become a 50/50 weight distribution canyon-carver/track-monster.

>>16399370
throw similar love at the Camaro suspension and watch the Mustang disappear in the rearview when the road gets twisty

>>16399361

uh oh looks like i hit a nerve

>>16399268
thats some nice gains, how much do those heads go for new ?

>>16399381
http://www.jegs.com/p/Ford-Performance/Ford-Performance-GT350-Coyote-Cylinder-Heads/3579613/10002/-1

>>16399372
And yet, when they square off in NASA's American Iron series, the Mustangs win, consistently.

File: pwc-circuit-of-the-americas-2015-38-kinetic-motorsports-kia-racing-kia-optima-mark-wilkins.jpg (389KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 800x533px

>>16399423
and yet, in the Pirelli World Challenge series GTS class, both repeatedly lose to a 4 cylinder FWD mid-size Kia sedan.

>>16399450
Where can I watch these races without cable?

>>16399137
GT500 will probably hold it's value better and it was the car used in the Knight Rider reboot. 2014 will have a nicer interior and some chassis improvements.

I would ask if you're going to mod it. And how long you're planning on keeping it.

The GT500 is a bit faster, and just a few mods later it will kill the 5.0. The biggest issue is traction.