are v6 engines being fazed out of midsized sedans? even if

File: absolutelybusy.jpg (118KB, 426x454px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 426x454px

Yeah, they've been doing this for a few years now, where the fuck you been?

Ya better get a v6 Camry asap cuz

>but at least let people have the choice
They wouldn't have to discontinue them if people kept buying them. They're a business after all. Also your argument of a 4 cyl with more torque and hp still being slower than a 6 cyl is utterly retarded.

>>16380376
the old 3.3l v6 sonata is faster than the twin turbo 2.0l they offer now

>>16380382
[citation needed]

>>16380068
For the average midsize? Yeah, more expensive ones will have TT v6 or a v8.

>giving a fuck about what engine performance you're getting from a boring shitbox

E400 4matic ?

File: 1397067909289.jpg (64KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 600x450px

>>16380382
>twin turbo 2.0l
>twin turbo
>twin
>turbo

>>16380068

Performance 4 door sedans is a niche market. Let upscale car makers like Mercedes, BMW and (to use your Hyundai example), Genesis fill those gaps. Id rather Hyundai, Honda etc focus more on giving me low cost and fuel economy for my wifes grocery getter.

>>16380068
>even if [...] a 4 cylinder [...] make more torque and hp, they will still be slower than a v6
This sounds legit.