Hey /o/ I'm considering buying a Lancer. I'm fairly

Just don't buy a shitty Lancer. Get a used Civic SI/Ford Focus ST/Mazdaspeed3 if you want a fun shitbox.

>>16354239
Get a civic for 3k. Why would you pay 16k or more for a shitty lancer that hasn't been changed in 10 years?

>>16354305
seriously, this.

mitsubishi doesn't make anything new that is worth a damn currently.

File: IMG_1849.jpg (110KB, 440x440px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 440x440px

>>16354239
>Hey /o/ I'm considering buying a Lancer

Consider suicide instead

File: e1aa67534d84fca6ce3ccfacbe7af016.jpg (6KB, 183x275px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 183x275px

>>16354313

>>16354239

Its fucking awful, I've driven a base lancer (non-evo) and they are bad, reallly bad.

>>16354239
Used to own a base Lancer 2010.

Honestly, not a bad car, but as others have indicated, others are better at any given field.

Toyotas/Hondas/Fords(?) get better MPG or come with more options, but if you want something basic, and I mean basic as in 'not-shit audio optional!!!' that gets acceptable MPG, won't die on you, and looks pretty good with the factory spoiler (subjective), then it's not a terrible idea, but there are objectively better cars out there.

Now, if you're planning on one day getting an Evo, that's a different story because dealer trade-in (yeah, they still have Evos on lots...) and getting used to the dimensions.

>>16357616
This. I own a 2009 GTS with the 2.4L engine and the cvt transmission. While the lancer is a good car in its way, you can honestly do better in its price range.

>>16354239
Holy fuck, no. Don't buy the Lancer. Buy literally any other car.