Do you think in the future we'll see people driving around

>>16313873
I sure will be

they'll be more common than say, model Ts are now

>>16313873
Judging by Mad Max yes

>>16313873
no.
Scientists estimate we will run out of oil is about 50-60 years at the current rate of consumption.

No oil = no cars

>>16313960
>What is bio-fuel?
>What is electric drivetrain conversion?

>>16314007
>these memes
Hydrogen or btfo

do people still drive model T's ?
you got your answer senpai

>>16313917
made me giggle

>>16313960
If gasoline ever goes away, I will bump my compression to 12:1, build a still, and drive my 69 fastback on ethanol.

>>16313873
I will be.

>>16314021
model Ts are barely drivable and hard to operate
cars from the 60s and 70s are about as easy to operate as any modern car

>>16313960
>Scientists estimate we will run out of oil is about 50-60 years at the current rate of consumption.
That was before fracking became cheap enough to use.

>>16313873
I hope I will be one of them

>>16313873

They'll be around but will be illegal to drive in most places. Places with displacement taxes, stringent inspections and general Nazi like car control will be the first to ban them.

>>16313960

Fuck off. We have at least 200 years left even with the increasing demands.

>>16314013

Hydrogen is a meme of the periodic table. It escapes and starts to fuck other elements. So it's like being cucked by hydrogen it's self. Unless you can produce it from clean energy (not nuclear) and pipe it directly to the fueling station, it's pointless. You waste too much transporting it. A lot of places need fucking drinking water piped in and you want to go turning that into fuel?

>>16315132
Just put the still in the back and drive from cornfield to cornfield demanding tribute.

>>16315153
>hurr durr changing the method of getting the oil totally changes how much there actually is
Fuck off retard

>>16315169
>Fuck off retard
No you please.
Because fracking is now viable we have access to previously inaccessible deposits and those deposits are so vast scientists are still learning that they're getting bigger.
Educate your stupid self.

>>16315169

Canada alone has so much that we don't even know what to do with it. We barely even use it, we buy it from other people. We got fuckloads of oil and water, were golden.

You califags should worry about sinking into the ocean instead of running out of oil.

>>16315169
It was discovered that you can use a hydraulic press to turn tires into crude oil.

Yes, they will be electric.

File: electric-1968-ford-mustang-zombie-222-11-970x546-c.jpg (152KB, 970x546px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 970x546px

>>16315202
that would be sweet

>>16315202
>>16315214
half the point of my driving classics is the sound of the engine. Fuck off with gaytric.

>>16315219
Simulate the sounds by other means, it is the future after all

>>16315152
Modern by today's standards, yes. By the standards 50 years from now, maybe not. Model Ts were still drivable in the late 40's.

>>16315225
No fuck that, it's incomparable.
The visceral feedback can't be replicated.
No sound system will ever be able to match the opening of secondaries on a quadrajet or thermoquad. Not even fuel injection sounds similar.

>>16315219

Motors and batteries are still way the fuck better than turbo 4 cylinders in muscle cars.

>>16315236
How did you get back to our time, since you're so familiar with future tech?

>>16315236
it would be easy to do

problem would be to slow it down enough to match the speed of the old gas relics

>>16315245
they already make apps on your phone that reads OBD and makes fake engine sounds play through the speakers. It sounds like shit.

>>16315244
the turbo 4-banger wasn't making the sound, it was what Fordgineers thought people wanted to hear.

>>16315267
>they already make apps on your phone that reads OBD and makes fake engine sounds play through the speakers. It sounds like shit.
No shit, it's playing through speakers. What's your point? What does that have to do with the possibility of us being able to accurately simulate engine sounds in the future?

>>16315260
it's not even just the sound, you can feel the pedal vibrating because the engine shakes and you hear the engine roaring etc.
It's a combination of different stimuli, and then the real question is, if you're going through with this song and dance to make electric cars sound and run like gas engines, why not just have a gas engine.

>>16315276
>What's your point?
literally i just posted:
>>16315219
>half the point of my driving classics is the sound of the engine. Fuck off with gaytric.

>What does that have to do with the possibility of us being able to accurately simulate engine sounds in the future?
Fraudulent sounds will never match the real thing.

>muh future
You can't forecast what's going to happen any better than I but i know they're already trying to replicate the sounds of old V8s and they're shit at it.

>>16313873
how often do you see a steam car rolling about ?

>>16315294
it could easily be done

and because electric is better in every objective manner other than range but you still need to appeal to feelsfags

>>16315303
>it could easily be done
No it can't because the people who want to force electric are the ones who don't give enough of a shit to make it right.
every carb/engine combo sounds different and they all make different sounds at different rpms and throttle positions and the nature of sound means that the same engine/carb combo sounds different in different cars.
Electric is dicks and for fags I'll drive gas until i die.

>>16315321
sorry if your the feelsfag that needs more than a normal person you should be the one to pay for it

electric is the only way to go but you can stay backwards until the law forces you to get smart

>>16313873
No, they'll all have been crashed by now.
That's what happens when you make cars that were supposed to be locomotives.

>>16313960
This is not accurate.

>>16315334
i'll stay backwards for as long as i want lmao.
don't forget to clean tyrone off tonight.

>>16315361
and of course you project your fetish on to me

File: corvette_stingray_l46_350_convertible_9.jpg (755KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

755KB, 2048x1536px

>>16313873
Sure, provided they aren't outlawed in order to accommodate soulless self-driven electrics in fifty years time. If that's' the case, I'll be driving away from cops on backroads while blasting this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAvQSkK8Z8U

File: Bogan.jpg (1MB, 1685x2527px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1685x2527px

>>16315365
I'm not the one wet for electric 2bh
$20 you're a leaf.

>>16315152
Cars from the sixties and seventies are certainly not always easy to operate if they have been allowed to degrade. There will only be a handful left that are drivable

>>16315377
Maybe if you're a wimp

>>16315377
>There will only be a handful left that are drivable
Lmao bs people preserve them as they are, only driving them once a month in summer.

>>16315377
>not always easy to operate
What?
The 50s-60s isn't the bronze age

>>16315374
yes

not being mentally backwards is nice

>Australian

oh your entire continent is backwards and a lost cause

>>16315152
And they drive at 100km/h.

>>16313960
They've been saying that for fifty years already.

>>16315407
>not being mentally backwards is nice
now you project your own faults onto me :)

>oh your entire continent is backwards and a lost cause
Actually not failian.

>>16315441
its not a projection

if youre against electric you are backwards

>Actually not failian.

couldve fooled me

>>16315416
this
>>16315407
>not being mentally backwards is nice
Said the regressive leftist, can't make this shit up kek. Enjoy your climate warming cult.

>>16315449
>if youre against electric you are backwards
psure they were saying that in the early 1900's when electric cars were in vogue. Why aren't they around right now?

oh because they're pieces of shit.

please continue and give new meaning to the words soulless shitbox.

>>16315482
except mass production and cheapness is why combustion engined cars survived

electric cars were extremely popular up until then

>>16315497
>except mass production and cheapness is why combustion engined cars survived
And why they'll continue thriving. Nobody is making a profit on hybrids. Nobody is going to dump millions to retool and build unprofitable vehicles. Brotrucks are getting more and more common each day. You're fighting a losing battle, one that only started with help from king nigger. He's not around anymore sorry.

Please post your Model 3 so i can see cuckery in action.

>>16315515
failing due to backwards retards being the majority

thats all there is to it

were in a massive degenerate era

>>16315536
stay btfo

File: F-14A_VF-114_over_burning_Kuwaiti_oil_well_1991.jpg (3MB, 2840x1840px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2840x1840px

>>16315536
>failing due to backwards retards being the majority
Oh so what you're saying is Americans don't want electric cars, the majority has spoken?
Utterly btfo.

your libshit tears are delicious.

Just for this i'm going to hop in my emissions exempt car and drive around a college town for a while.
Pic related: after i get done driving.

File: amarok.jpg (31KB, 736x490px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 736x490px

>>16315580
>this pleases the volkswagen

>>16315604
tfw no tdi to roll coal

>>16315580
its because the majority cant afford them lmao

why so edgy about it

>>16315652
>its because the majority cant afford them lmao
>can afford $60k worth of brotruck
>not a $30k Tesla
kek

File: Feels-Bad-Man-Frog-02.png (303KB, 724x669px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 724x669px

>>16315645
iktfb

Assuming my shitbox doesn't bite the dust yes.

>>16315226
yeah but in the late 40's a model T was only 20 years old, while a 60's car is already almost 60 years old

>>16315301
How often are B-52 Stratofortress' used? How often is windows xp used?

File: stanley.jpg (103KB, 638x473px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 638x473px

>>16315301

There's a few out there. They're bulletproof.

>>16315652
>Not wanting to be able to fully recharge car in less than 6 hours

>>16315775
>not taking 30 seconds to fill up gas.

>>16315791
That's what he meant by "fully recharge", pointing out that a electric takes 6 hours.

>>16315865
oh

>>16315865
Yeah I feel like that is the main thing holding me back from accepting electric cars. I still wouldn't get one, but it'd be understandable if you could recharge in a single minute.
Maintenance would also be an issue for me, what happens if one of the motors goes bad, or the battery no longer holds a large enough charge?
And then the sensory experience will always be lacking, especially at low speeds.

>>16315449
> couldve fooled me
My mentally retarded neighbour could've fooled your dumbass

>>16313960
>Current rate of consumption

Remember what an electric car is? Almost nobody will be driving ICE cars in 20 years anyway.

>>16316303
>Almost nobody will be driving ICE cars in 20 years anyway.
Yes they will

>>16316303
>implying we can't synthesize clean diesel from water and CO2
kek, unless a solution is found to battery charging, ICE is here to stay

>>16316321
What a dumb, roundabout way of using energy.

>>16316331
>what is energy density and why is it desirable

>>16316331
>having green ICEs is bad

>>16313873
nah, it will be made illegal and only permitted on tracks or private property.

>>16316397
Nah, they won't ever get banned. They'll just become like horses are today, only enthusiasts will own them. I would expect that most people would have an electric car for the 9-5 grind and an ICE car for weekend adventures.

File: FB_IMG_1476162497373.jpg (40KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 960x540px

>>16315152
With upgrades I'd say, my 66 coupe with drum brakes and no power steering was a death wish when I upgraded the motor, fixed now

>>16313873
Sure, when nu-male cucks of the future sit in their self-driving cars connected by anal plugs, some people will drive filthy fossil-fuel powered cars

>>16317598
Nice car dude, I'm not a fan of the color, but it's your car note mine. Keep enjoying it!

And I hope that mine will still be on the road for its 100th birthday (8 august 2064, 48 years to go)

t. owner of a 65' convertible mustang

File: IMG_5698.jpg (113KB, 500x347px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 500x347px

>>16315152
BARELY DRIVABLE?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=m1rlyl8VZFM

>>16315749
I wouldn't go THAT far, but the Doble ain't bad.

File: 1465382265977.jpg (61KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 800x600px

no

boomers will still have them in their fucking garages 100 years from now thanks to life extending tech

File: kek.jpg (134KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 800x800px

>>16317598
>can't drive without PS
lmao cuck

>>16315226
>Model Ts were still drivable in the late 40's
Yeah if you replace the batteries and every other electric component

>>16315334
Electric is not the only way to go, anon. There are plenty of other methods of powering vehicles. I personally think that the internal combustion engine isn't going anywhere anytime soon.

File: mffww.jpg (273KB, 1348x760px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1348x760px

>>16318377
well yeah, no shit the batteries will need to be replaced. Even today batteries last 5 years MAX.

and every other electric component? HOW MANY FUCKING ELECTRIC COMPONENTS ARE THERE IN A MODEL T?

>YFW Model T costed $260 in 1925 which is equal to a little bit over 3 grand today :(

>>16318571
Well, to be fair, people made less money back then even when adjusted for inflation, and Henry Ford wanted to be able to sell to farmers and the working man.

>>16317554
How optimistic of you. The only pleasure people will be allowed to experience will be chemical.

>>16313873
Yes, horse driven muscle cars. Yeeha!

>>16313960
they said the same thing in the 90's

>we'll be out of fuel by the next decade!!!

>>16318197
>year is 2155
>get a barn find in an auction
>strangely cheap
>noice 69 mustang, mint shape
>get in my new old car to drive it
>hear a grumbling voice from the radio
>wut
>realize radio has been replaced with some space age KITT nonsense
>1969 Mustang Mach 1! one of a kind I know what I got!
>Boomer put his brain in the car
>have to drive around with no radio, just a Boomer constantly complaining about lazy millennials

File: 1481557234768.jpg (31KB, 394x395px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 394x395px

>>16313873
Maybe in 30 years you will be able to 3d print any car. You will be able to pirate any car schematics and assemble them in your garage.
Also, oil will be extracted from marine algae in large scale.
It is a bright future

>>16319281
kek

>>16319281
kek, surprised me
that said, even if it had a radio I don't expect analog radio to work in that time