What is the Ford GT doing that isn't done by the McLaren

Why do you care? Both are fast enough to rip your insides out, whichever goes faster around a track with the same driver by a few tenths of a second is basically meaningless information.

Be faster

>>16223408
McLaren is a supercar company, Ford makes Foci and F150s. The GT exists simply to be a halo car.

>>16223421

This.

/thread.

>>16223461
It's an ecoboost advertisement

>>16223476
A halo car has always been a rolling advertisement.

File: 1461990206724.jpg (144KB, 740x555px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 740x555px

One thing you forgot that the GT does not have
>V8
if the 675LT is faster even by a few tenths of a second on top of being $50,000 cheaper i won't stop shitposting about it. it'll be M4 vs Camaro all over again.

>>16223519
And further more, if you have the dough, you can get it.

File: bimmercucks.jpg (1MB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1360px

>>16223519
I was a little sad that the SS 1LE didn't restart the M4 vs Camaro war.

>M4 GTS
>135k
>big wing and semi-slicks
>1:37.66

>SS 1LE
>45k
>street compound tires and hardly any aero
>1:37.77

>>16223421
BTFO

File: 1446066974172.png (78KB, 190x212px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 190x212px

>>16223408
>1230kg
>extremely lightweight

i don't thinks so

>>16223682
I bet you think your 100hp shitbox is impressive for being under 2500lbs too

>>16223704
nice projection faggot

doesn't change the fact that "extremely lightweight" is not 1230kg no matter how much power it makes
radical RXC is lightweight, mclaren is not, simple as that

>>16223760
A Radical is a fucking toy that is effectively useless off track. A McLaren is an actual car you can drive daily and not be miserable in.

>>16223787
are you retarded or something?
what does it change?

Best power:weight of any production car. McLaren is light, but the GT takes lightweight to the next lvl.

Also, 2 personal reasons;
1 more car to btfo ferrarifags
Nice rear ASTHETIC