Based only on outward appearance, what's the most beautiful

File: Chrysler_300_C_1957_2.jpg (34KB, 800x385px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 800x385px

>>16198901
300

File: 62F.jpg (146KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 800x600px

>>16198901

File: 1970-oldsmobile-442.jpg (827KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

827KB, 1920x1080px

1970 Oldsmobile 442 W30.

>>16198933
like shit

>>16198949
like shit

>>16198976
The red wheels are what really does it

File: rex17.jpg (170KB, 1000x670px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1000x670px

>>16198954
but your opinion is wrong

>>16198985
it's fact

Mazda fags with their full blown denial lmao

>>16198901
>>16198906
>>16198933
>Murica

File: 1475132265946.jpg (1MB, 2048x1536px)

1MB, 2048x1536px

>>16198983
yes

theyre the best when color matched

File: 1467639984533.jpg (101KB, 800x433px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 800x433px

>>16198985
>work meisters
fuuuuuuuuuck
Also pic related is up there for me.

File: 1398886021.jpg (125KB, 1200x797px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1200x797px

>>16198901
1961 Chevrolet Impala Bubble Top.
>dat ass

>>16199015
true

>>16198906
mahnigga.jpg

File: e810c8e0-a550-48d0-a98b-389cae0a6a3a-2060x1236.jpg (69KB, 620x372px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 620x372px

Mercedes-Benz 770

File: ferrari_250_gt_swb_bertone_1.jpg (365KB, 1024x768px)

365KB, 1024x768px

Definitely not one of those overrated American buckets whose nature of being an enormous upside down bathtub has been badly covered up by cladding them in needless chrome stripes and colored shapes.

File: 47_151_1970_OLDSMOBILE_CUTLASS 442_1.jpg (79KB, 779x495px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 779x495px

>>16198933
Best answer.

>>16198992
Nah man, more of a '90s jap fag if anything.

Other than the last gen rx7 and cosmo, mazdas designers haven't done much, although their current lineup is pretty nice.

File: a324.jpg (105KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 640x480px

I dont know what it is about this car.
At a glance, it tells you everything you need to know about it.
Its so simple, but it looks so good.

File: 1474991317780.jpg (586KB, 940x1422px) Image search: [Google]

586KB, 940x1422px

>>16198901
I can't help but like the 1960 DeSotos better just because of Sam & Max.

>>16199057
what does the beak do ?

>>16199122
enhance penny pinching

>>16199122
Look good. This was Bertone's personal commission because he didn't want to drive around in the same car as the rest of the Ferrari peasants.

>>16199134
being a snowflake doesnt make it look good tho

>>16199140
this it looks like shit

File: 2016-cadillac-ats-sedan-20t-awd-test-review-car-and-driver-photo-668391-s-429x262.jpg (21KB, 429x262px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 429x262px

Say what you want, I really like newer Cadillac styling.

File: 1966_ford_gt40_mk1_0194_bh[1].jpg (364KB, 1959x1102px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 1959x1102px

literally the greatest car design of all time
they didn't even have to change it 40 years later and it still looked modern

File: P1060656.jpg (1MB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1600x1200px

>>16199122
it does have that sneaky look
>>16199134
neat
it just looks weird from many angles
the lower half ends so abruptly
67 pontiac gto has a lees pronounced version

File: P1100145.jpg (4MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3264x2448px

>>16198901
> Those lines
> Those curves
> The way the wheels have to have swoopy bits over them so they're covered
> No roof
> Wide tires
Unf. 1960s america must have been a beautiful place.

>>16199169
they started out with this goofy looking thing

>>16199164
you are not alone

>>16199237
looks cooler than the GT40 tbqh

>>16199028
>dat plate

I'd have to go with the c1.

File: 01-1948-tucker-torpedo[1].jpg (312KB, 1280x850px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 1280x850px

Objectively superior

>>16199301
why were expensive American cars of the time so fucking ugly

>>16198995
spotted the poverty-cuck

File: bc6c4d1abc674c8c3c26b933f923a96c.jpg (185KB, 640x437px)

185KB, 640x437px

55 chevy

File: Untitled.jpg (29KB, 434x231px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 434x231px

>>16199241
tfw the mk4 gets no respect

File: 1308810295140.png (205KB, 500x280px)

205KB, 500x280px

>>16199354
>tucker torpedo
>ugly
yeah okay

>>16199407
looks like it was designed by a retard like most expensive American cars of the time

SWOOPS
VENTS
CHROME
CHROME
CHROME

the late 40s to about mid 60s were just ugly at least it was early enough to not have fins

>>16199354
It was a transitional period. They were going from exposed fenders to what they called shoebox. Harley Earl is the only designer from America at the time who had good looking transitional cars. Ford skips this stage altogether. Chryslers of this period are the ugliest of these cars.

File: efb76fe9be95a82bda08ac87c58f0310.jpg (74KB, 736x490px)

74KB, 736x490px

>>16198901
Mazda RX3

>>16199442
>>16199518
t. Philistines

File: 1949-Cadillac-Series-61-Sedanette-Front.jpg (165KB, 1024x678px)

165KB, 1024x678px

>>16199518
yeah your post seems about right from googling around

I was about to post pic related as a good looking expensive car of the time and turns out he designed it

Shoebox Fords are cool too

File: ford-model-a-05.jpg (74KB, 630x420px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 630x420px

this thing.

>>16199539
Nice reading comprehension bud. read >>16199518 again.

>>16199518
>Chryslers of this period are the ugliest of these cars.
bs you pussy they were the only things that looked decent

>>16199556
easily the ugliest

>>16199561
easily not

File: fb5f2a8c5911ccc4f6e77d99e043245c.jpg (2MB, 1478x979px)

2MB, 1478x979px

>>16199561
say again?

File: Jag_Xk8.jpg (1MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1536px

>>16199583

Or her sister

>>16199556
Chryslers were considered ugly then and still are ugly. Chrysler nearly went under in the 50s until Virgil Exner started designing their cars. They were in such bad shape they needed a 250m loan from Prudential to even design and build the Exner designs

>>16199585
We were talking about the pre-Exner cars bud.

File: dscn2784.jpg (2MB, 3451x1811px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3451x1811px

>>16199585
I was talking about late 40s and early 50s

but that looks terrible even compared to a Chevy

>>16199583
>>16199594
Cars that looks like fish

File: 146601908907151.jpg (252KB, 1438x1188px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1438x1188px

>>16199601
wups.

File: 1455836913713.jpg (42KB, 500x370px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 500x370px

>>16199606
oh come on, it's not that bad...

>>16199620
its personal preference of course

I hate fins and chrome with a passion

late 50s American cars are imo some of the ugliest ever made

Cheby has less fin and more subtle design so I like it more

>>16198949
+1. So aesthetically pleasing

File: 1912_Chevrolet_Classic_Six_267270b.jpg (290KB, 1000x550px)

290KB, 1000x550px

>>16199633
got a point there.

i like all of'm. i don't think i really hate any old cars/vehicles. except starting somewhere in the 80's, that's when things got weird.

File: Jaguar_XKR_X100.jpg (694KB, 1920x1272px) Image search: [Google]

694KB, 1920x1272px

>>16199611

Cars that photos don't do justice.

>>16199597
>Chryslers were considered ugly then and still are ugly
no
>Chrysler nearly went under in the 50s until Virgil Exner started designing their cars.
That's when people considered Chryslers ugly.

File: 1453148743913.png (555KB, 3300x3140px) Image search: [Google]

555KB, 3300x3140px

>>16199660
>Cars that photos don't do justice.
wat.

File: 1938 plmouth coupe.jpg (491KB, 1600x1254px) Image search: [Google]

491KB, 1600x1254px

>>16199659
its cool mayne

60s-70s is my favorite era and I generally prefer European styling to American

pre-war stuff is cool in general though

>>16199664
You're actually retarded mate. GM and Ford didn't scramble to redesign their cars because the 1957 Mopars were so ugly

>>16199716
Forward look is considered ugly af among moparists.

Chrysler was playing ketchup to GM downsizing.
Doesn't matter anyway, everything you and i have said is opinion.

>>16199769
Except what I said is fact. GM planned to use the 1958 design through 1960 but when the 1957 Mopars came out they redesigned everything for 1959.

>>16199788
>Except what I said is fact.
incorrect

>but when the 1957 Mopars came out they redesigned everything for 1959.
57 was the year where the designs were meant to hold over while the stylists worked on the 60 designs.

File: 2015_mercedes-benz_s-class-pic-679937374229473018-1600x1200.jpg (429KB, 1600x922px) Image search: [Google]

429KB, 1600x922px

i unironicaly think this

Euro designs are sooooo boooooring

>>16199810
>confused front end
>side parts don't flow with the rest of the car
>looks like someone tried to use the side skirt as a jacking point

File: Datsun_280ZX_Turbo_in_blue_and_silver.jpg (3MB, 3622x1772px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3622x1772px

Doesn't matter the angle, it always looks sexy

>>16199878
>lose bumpers

brb vomiting

>>16199878
THE FOOSE IS LOOSE

File: 198857_Front_3-4_Web.jpg.png (2MB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1000x667px

1958 Chevrolet Impala Convertible

>>16199878
lol my family has one in the middle of the desert rotting away. they wont give it to me though because my mom likes it too much

>>16199585
Did we just become best friends?

>>16200015
YEP

>>16199583
Nice focus.

>>16200056
I don't think that's a ford beside it

>>16199122
It served as a special instrument for passing females to thrust their genitals upon repeatedly until completion in the event that the driver was absent.

File: Lamborghini-Aventador.jpg (106KB, 1024x575px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1024x575px

had now idea how many senior citizens with shit taste browsed /o/

>>16198949
yep, beautiful curves, nothing beats it.

>>16200223
LOL

File: lamborghini-murcielago-sv-06[1].jpg (154KB, 1024x682px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1024x682px

>>16200223
If you're gonna post a modern Lambo, at least post the Murcielago SV you pleb.

File: 280px-LamborghiniDiabloSV.jpg (18KB, 280x176px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 280x176px

>>16200246
objectively shit


(required listening)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziX_f7rdFD4

File: roadster_21-aventador.jpg (332KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 1920x1080px

>>16200246
>>16200256
nah
nice runner ups tho

>>16200268
true, the countach is the alpha lambo

>>16200279
Countach is ugly as fuck

File: 1989_Lamborghini_Countach.jpg (64KB, 700x525px)

64KB, 700x525px

>>16200296
whoa lets not get carried away

>>16200296
top faggit

>>16200296
absolutely pleb-tier

>>16200311
si

is ugly

just like every Lambo before the Diablo that isnt a Miura

>>16200311
>is a wedge
>aerodynamics of a brickwall
so fucking glorious, wish i could afford one.

File: zis-112.jpg (48KB, 800x385px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 800x385px

>>16199301
Ha

File: gm_lesabre_concept_car_5.jpg (149KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1024x768px

>>16200372
>soviet originality

File: 1475348989765.jpg (75KB, 500x375px)

75KB, 500x375px

>not going for the superior japanese mix
Tremendous amount of plebs

>>16199028
Heil

File: IMG_0208.jpg (55KB, 575x431px)

55KB, 575x431px

>>16198901
1964 ford falcon
2005 ford gt
1969 boss 429 mustang
1972 ford maverick
or 1967 ford bronco

Its really hard to pick just one

File: Lamborghini Miura n. 1 al salone.jpg (312KB, 847x683px)

312KB, 847x683px

Sorry guys, Italians do it better

File: lamborghini-400-gt-6.jpg (2MB, 2880x1800px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2880x1800px

>>16200336
I still don't get how the .cd is so high
that said trailing edge areo causes more drag than leading edge