Looking to buy my first car in Spring of next year after having

>>16192837
>paying money for a fiero
Why not get a turbo mr2?

They look cool, but are trash. 4k is a lot for an 80's shitbox.

Fieros are garbage

stay away unless its an 88 GT

>>16192842
The Fiero is less likely to kill you with snap oversteer. It's not a meme. The Fiero is 10 times more forgiving than an MR2. It's also easier to find, easier to work on since the body panels all unbolt, and infinitely safer since the chassis was way overengineered.
It's a beginner's MR car before moving onto more serious MR cars like the MR2. You don't immediately jump into a Dodge Viper for your first sportscar.

>>16192837
Avoid these cars.
That being said, snap oversteer is a meme. Driving any mid engines car at speed requires a better understanding of driving dynamics, such as avoiding lifting off the throttle as you enter the apex of a corner, which is what causes this. It doesn't just happen on its own.
A 60hp Fiat X1/9 can ruin your day if you don't understand this.

>>16192884
>It's not a meme.

Fiero with a bodykit

>It's a beginner's MR car before moving onto more serious MR cars like the MR2

those are both entry level shitbox tier MRs

>>16192929
The MR2's handling characteristics are closer to a Lotus or Ferrari than to a Corolla mainly because the MR2 got a bespoke platform.
The Fiero's chassis was a combination of other GM platforms. The front end came from the Chevrolet Chevette, meanwhile the rear suspension was taken from the front of the FWD A and W-body cars which is why engine swaps in the Fiero are so fucking easy. As a result, the Fiero is more likely to understeer than snap oversteer. This makes it safer and easier to drive especially as someone's first ever MR car.
Seriously. Don't talk about them when you've never driven either car.

>>16192884
Oh. So youre just retarded.

File: crushing-disappointment.jpg (21KB, 620x363px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 620x363px

>>16192965
Fucking moron

>>16192884
lmao