>2001 Subaru Legacy GT Wagon >180k miles on body >76k

>>16165848

No.

Unless you're buying either an H6 or a turbo Subaru, you're wasting your money.

>>16166065
why do you say so? This wouldnt make a decent daily driver for the winter?

no, that thing haa probably been beat to hell

never buy a car with a new engine, if the owner neglected it to the point of needing an engine swap, I can't imagine how bad it is

>>16165848
If it's in decent shape, I'd say go for it. My GT needed an engine rebuild to replace those head gaskets so an engine swap isn't unheard of.

I say it's not a bad idea, and if you want it, go for it

>>16166079
why would you ever buy a car that had the engine replaced? that's a huge red flag that it hasn't been taken care of.

>>16166402
how is that a red flag if the cars engine was replaced?

mate.

>>16166432
Because an engine =/= a car. If the engine was neglected/abused then chances are the trans and all other fluids were too. You should always just fix the head gasket if they fail instead of getting some unknown used engine.

top cuck

dont listen to this guy >>16166463

>>16168226
What's wrong with that statement?

>>16165848
I'd bite for 2.3k, that's about as high as I'd go though.

>>16169693
oh word pham