How come you cant drive an older cheaper model of porsche without

Sour grapes.

Because old cars are shit, especially entry level sports luxury cars.

>>16159463
But the 944 was originally meant to replace the 911 and its still cheap.

>>16159476
>But the 944 was originally meant to replace the 911
Which it failed to do.

>and its still cheap.
Because it wasn't the best in its day, and it's certainly not the best today. Still looks great, though.

>>16159453
Because most people aren't "car people" and the only thing that matters some times is brand identity.

>>16159488
Only because porsche purists were all
>but muh mid engine

File: 914-8piech-copyright-porsche.jpg (63KB, 864x282px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 864x282px

>>16159476
>944 was originally meant to replace the 911
""wrong""

>>16159535
No.

>>16159453
I drive a 1981 911, and I've never experienced what you're talking about?

Why this car? It was made the year I was born, and for some reason I think that is cool

normies don't understand "liking" cars, they think cars are only status symbols, so getting an older one because you like how it drives makes no sense to them

>>16159549
the 944 replaced the 924 which replaced the 914 which replaced the 912 which replaced the 356

>>16159932
No.

File: Poorsche.jpg (100KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 800x600px

>>16159453