>"peppy" >"not fast, but quick" >"has

File: image_search_1478954042183.jpg (103KB, 450x344px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 450x344px

>>16149742
But anon those are valid ways to describe card with low end torque.

Case in point. 350z: 240 hp to the wheels while 3700 lbs fat. However 300lbs of torque at the very beginning of the power curve.

>>16150540
>with low end torque
>almost exclusively used to describe shit slow strung out 4 pots with no power anywhere

See: Clarkson and every wannabe reviewer that tries to be like him (all of them) describing Miatas, old Triumphs, anything made by Alfa Romeo, etc.

>it just gets up and moves

What did he mean by this?

File: image_search_1474550783784.jpg (69KB, 670x400px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 670x400px

>>16150550
None of those cars you mentioned have low end torque

>>16150565
Yeah, that's the point- Nobody uses "peppy," "zippy," "eager," etc. to describe cars with low end torque- Not to mention they're wishy washy buzzwords that don't describe things in any meaningful quality you fucking retard- As evidenced by people like Clarkson using them to describe the exact opposite of what you claim to be suitable descriptors for.

>>16150540
350z is <3300lb not 3700

File: IMG_0972.jpg (27KB, 510x288px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 510x288px

>>16150580
lmao autism

>>16150540
that graph doesnt even go up to 300 ft lbs at any point. in fact it starts pretty close to 200 ft lbs

File: 9401327678.jpg (76KB, 561x640px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 561x640px

>>16149742
>not understanding torque
>only looks at the BHP meme

>>16150876
>torque
Without RPM torque is meaningless.
Hey dig this, a cyclist can generate more torque than a 600cc Supersport motorcycle. They must accelerate like mad eh

>>16150580
Whats your beef with Jeremy "The Fracas Jackass" Clarkson?

>>16149742
>"peppy"

anytime I here someone describe a car like this it's always a shitty first car tier econobox