Is it legal to remove the doors from your shitbox and drive it

>>16137235
100% illegal. Because retards cannot operate machinery in public spaces.

File: eafTLxYHXF-12.png (34KB, 300x250px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 300x250px

>>16137256

Why the hate?

It looks like it would be pretty fun, even if it was incredibly impractical

>>16137256

Also should of mentioned it is hard to find a definitive answer on google for the question.

>>16137235
Legal? Yes (jeeps)
Stupid? Yes (cop will pull you over and ticket you got unsafe equipment anyways)

just put a wrangler badge on the back & the authorities shouldn't bother you.

maybe get a jeep badge for the front as well, because everyone expects jeep owners to do autistic shit like that anyways.

>hurrrr muh jeep thing

>>16137307

I'm talking about cars with non removable doors, e.g. ford fiesta, is it legal for them?

>>16137312

Would that really work if you have a something like a fiesta?

Also I know it's highly autistic/impractical, but I want to see what it's like. I have the windows down 24/7 even at 80 mph since I like the noise/wind/sensation of speed.

>>16137341
i don't see why it wouldn't work

if shit gets sketchy for some reason just turn around and head home carefully

File: J9.jpg (49KB, 550x413px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 550x413px

just get one of these
the doors slide backwards and you can legally drive with them back

>>16137374

Alright anon, thanks.

>>16137341
Unibody cars count on the doors to be part of the actual structure. This is one of the few times where a convertible would make you look like less of a faggot.

File: peugeot_1007__10_.jpg (43KB, 730x462px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 730x462px

>>16137375

Thanks anon, but I'm looking for a car.

Noticed this as well which has similar doors, but (apparently) it's shit.

>>16137392

I have looked at convertibles, my shit box is on its last legs anyway. I'll probably get one when it dies.

File: 26145409vw.jpg (94KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 800x800px

Around here you need need chains instead if you unmount the doors. Of course in reality they won't make a crap of a difference but on paper they prevent you from falling out. Maybe it's a similar thing in the UK.

t. Germany

>>16137413

Thanks, I'd be fine having some shitty chains on the doors if it meant I stayed within the law.

File: 1459363067461.png (441KB, 467x700px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 467x700px

>>16137235
y tho.

looks ugly af

>>16137437

Wind/noise/sensation of speed.

Technically, yes, as long as you don't leave sharp edges and shit everywhere, and provided your insurers are notified so your policy remains valid.

If you do a terrible hack job with a circular saw and tin snips, you can be charged with 'use of a vehicle when its use involves a danger of injury to any person'. It's an old, poorly worded catch-all, but it can carry a £100+ fine if you fall foul of it.

File: 924d5aabda3384116bd678a7d03a6ed1.jpg (84KB, 578x385px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 578x385px

>>16137446
ah so.

why not get this? 127 mph with nothing around you.

>>16137446
>sensation of speed

Then get an actual fast car, you mongoloid.

>UK

Just fucking jog if you want the wind in your face, it'll feel faster.

>>16137446
>>>/dbt/

>>16137375
Good luck finding a J7 in England.
Mk1-2 Transits and Bedford CA and the Commers all had sliding doors.

>>16137452

Thanks, this was really what I was looking for, couldn't find the answer on google.

I guess I'd check with my insurer how much the cost would increase by before doing it aswell.

>>16137460

Hard to maintain
Unsafe (I know this is very ironic when I'm removing the doors on my car)
Looks unstable, as if it could topple

Looked at getting a caterham, but they're way too expensive.

>>16137468

It's all the factors combined I like, I have the windows open absolutely 24/7.

>>16137472

>tfw too much of a pussy

I'm sure I'd love one though, and could put up with it being impractical

>>16137468
>he doesn't go absolutely mental on country roads during non-traffic times

B roads are best roads. Hell, even something like the Fosse is fun, thanks to the hedges and hills.

>>16137482
>Looked at getting a caterham, but they're way too expensive.
get a westfield

>>16137524

Still too expensive, I'm absolutely broke.

Thanks anyway, I'll try and get something similar when I've got a bit more cash.

File: 1444245826611.png (25KB, 560x407px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 560x407px

Depends on where you are and such

My best guess would be that removing them is in a grey-zone for most of Europe, while removing doors with airbags in them is probably not legal

>>16137553

Airbags thing makes sense, thanks.

I think I'm gonna ring up the DVLA tomorrow.