>Dodge Intrepid RWD Conversion Why don't more people

>tfw my first car was an intrepid
>it had one of those foot activated parking brakes that i used every day and sometimes forgot to release
>the light for it didn't work (cuz it was a 250k mile piece of shit)
>only just now learned that they were fwd
Now I know what the noise was that it made when I drove it with the parking brake on

>>16127124
intrepids are ugly cheaply built cars that should have all disappeared under the cash for clunkers program.

The only people who would find this a good idea are domiciled in trailer parks.

>>16127124
>Sludge engines

>>16127124
>all you gotta do is swap in a RWD transmission, rear diff and axle, and a driveshaft.

Where is the driveshaft going to go? Where's the transmission going to go? What about the firewall? Engine mounts? It's not a simple "Just shove this shit in and done." Or you'd be seeing RWD Integras, and Preludes all over the place

>>16127155
I mean it kinda is. There's already most of a transmission tunnel, since the platform was originally designed to be RWD. You can take the guts of a Plymouth Prowler and stick it into an Intrepid and it'll all fit very nicely.

>>16127150
That's why you swap a big block in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLSrwAgIv58

>>16127124
Why would you want this?

>>16127149

i actually haven't seen a dodge intrepid in years

File: 1477658594134.jpg (32KB, 460x423px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 460x423px

>>16127124
>why wont more people dump their hard earned money and time into a worthless, poorly built 15-year old econobox?

File: 1416783612395.jpg (22KB, 230x320px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 230x320px

>longitudinal fwd

The 3.5 is quite the engine, but it sits retardedly forward due to the fwd-ness.
I can see why, but meh.