Are Jeep Renegades any good? I like the idea of a newer 4x4

>>16119693
>fiat
No

I don't
No axles
No 4.0
FWD when 4wd not engaged

>>16119718
Alright, well how about a Forester?

Im trying to see what my options are with a commuter car that can also go into mild dirt trails.

>>16119718
1st and 2nd gen Foresters, i shouldve specified

>>16119739
any car drive drive down a dirt trail. just get a civic for 3k.

>>16119762
2nd gen or 3rd gen
Also dont discount 1st and 2nd gen RAV4

File: cream.jpg (17KB, 403x312px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 403x312px

>>16119693
Just get a RAV4.

>>16119837
>>16119816
>rav 4
Why did i forget about these.

Ill check them out too since im a Toyotafag normally

File: Screenshot_2016-11-05-16-10-14.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>16119693
Yeah they're great. Especially the brakes.

File: Screenshot from 2016-11-05 18-25-50.png (174KB, 603x430px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 603x430px

MPG is not that great considering how small it is.

What about HR-V manual? The only downside is no AWD.

>>16121281
No thanks man, i was trying to avoid fwd.
Awd wouldve worked too.

Isn't it just a Fiat Panda ?

>>16120462
Made me kek at work. Thanks anon.

>>16119693
Get a Suzuki Swift 4x4 or Panda Cross

>>16119883
I have a 2004 rav 4 VVT-i with a facelift.

I have to say it's a damn nice car. Sure everyone says it's a bad compromise between a decade old sporty hatch and a contemporary suv, but honesty it goes well thanks to the engine, it corners decently and it's surprisingly good in deep snow and mud as long as you know how to drive.

Only complaint I have about my rav4 is the automatic

>>16119693

They've got a nasty habit of eating the front tires prematurely and lifting the rear end off the ground under heavy braking.

https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=jrMKhcHJH1o