what's the smallest turbo my money can buy? hypothetically

something off a TDI VW

>>16101785
Something out of a tsi vw. (20-30 psi)

You can get a china 2554 turbo that'll be a perfect for for a 2.0l or there about. Should spool up nicely around 3-4k.

>>16101800
what does he need 30psi for with that power target?

>>16101785
>>16101838
i'll consider these

>>16101800
that might be a bit too much for what i want but i'll still check it out

File: 1343848580281.gif (2MB, 328x252px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 328x252px

>>16101736
>turbo.jpg

lel that tattoo never gets old.

File: triple wankle.jpg (3MB, 4288x2848px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4288x2848px

>>16101736
you should get a shiny tarbo

File: IMG_8417.jpg (62KB, 708x787px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 708x787px

>>16102544
>chrome tarbo
Hnnnng

>>16102575
How the fuck is this supposed to work?

to be more precise :
How the fuck this will be more efficient than a single chamber rotor?

>>16102744
I have no idea, I'm sure the automotive engineers at RR know their shit and did the math, but my only idea is it takes up less space than 2 rotors so you can fit a bunch in one car.

File: RollsRoyceVerbundmotor.jpg (54KB, 348x464px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 348x464px

>>16102744
i think that was the diesel one.
this one

http://www.buyautoparts.com/buynow/2014/Volkswagen/Jetta/Turbocharger/40-30660_ON.html?xref=300238
what do you guys think?

>>16102744
>>16102761
Are you guys fucking retarded and not know how a rotary works? The main disadvantages of a rotary are all becuase it does not burn all the fuel and extract as much energy as a piston engine does. A two stage design would theoretically allow the rest of the fuel to burn and extract more useful energy.


Why else did you think rotaries shit fire?