With all the advances in carmaking, cars are still inherent compromises, which is sort of stupid. If you want a family car, it's going to have four doors and two rows of seats and cargo space so it's likely some sort of slow sedan or crossover with high fuel economy but bad performance. Performance gets even worse if you have to get a van with three rows and six doors. If it's a sports car it'll only have one row of seats so you can't fit more than two people in the car and it can't carry anything. If you're doing work that requires a lot of cargo space like carpentry or plumbing you need a truck, so you get something that has really bad performance and can't seat more than three or four people comfortably. Larger and heavier cars handle more poorly than smaller cars, which means there's always a performance compromise.
Why hasn't anyone solved the compromise? Have an inexpensive $15k lightweight car with high performance that has two doors but is also a crossover that has three rows of seats and four doors so you can fit six people, a cargo bed and lots of low end torque work for trucking and cargo purposes, with high fuel economy? A cheap car that can work as both a sports car, family sedan/crossover, and truck at the same time should absolutely dominate the car industry.
tldr
It'd be shit.
Modern crash and safety standards = heavy. Getting around these requires lightweight advanced parts= expensive. You can't have it all
>has two doors but also four doors
>>16098248
>>16098273
RX8. Rolls Royces. Sort of. Ish. Not really.
Can I smoke weed with you, OP?
>>16098248
They do make family suited sedans with badass performance, though. Like the Chevy SS, BMWs, Hellcats (even tho Chrysler is trash), and if you're not that loaded and can deal with a plain old automatics, there's the V6 Accord and Camry sedans.
So what, you want an affordable sedan with good cargo space, good performance, and plenty of room?
Used turbo Optima.
>>16098248
What is Subaru Impreza
The answer to your question is the Volvo Turbo Wagon.
>>16098354
this
or a b spec legacy wagon, twin turbo
Because it's fucking impossible to be small and have tons of cargo space at the same time?
Just get a wagon desu
>>16099308
an older wagon is best, my 03 impreza wagon is actually pretty small especially compared to modern cars
You just described a wagon good job OP
>>16098248
>If you're doing work that requires a lot of cargo space like carpentry or plumbing you need a truck
No, you need a van. Pickups only exist for rednecks to compare their (lack of) endowments to each other. They're not actually good at anything. If you were actually using it for work, you would get a van, flatbed, or box truck.
>>16099308
Twingo though
>>16099450
Pickups are great for offroad and towing plus camping
dumbass i fucking hate you, you don't know shit
>>16099450
You'll learn more about how the real world works when you get out of highschool.
ITS CALLED A BUICK ROADMASTER FUCCBOI
>wanting a car that isn't particularly good at anything
Buy a sports car and a truck/suv/wagon/crossover like every other hardworking middleclass American.
What is Impreza/Legacy Wagon?
4x4 fast engine. loads of room
>two doors
>three rows of seats
you could see your sisters panties as she climbs over the seats in her school girl uniform