>stock intake takes air from as far away from engine as possible

>>16072751
>not knowing the difference between a short ram intake and a shielded cai

>>16072751
>moving the intake far from the engine which is radiates large amounts of heat
>cone filters offer more surface area and better air flow
>implying any of this is a problem

you want to try again?

>>16072751
They can free up some HP in the event that the intake was a restriction. Obviously ones that put the intake filter right by a heat source are probably going to be more detrimental than not. The 10HP they always claim is fairly bullshit, especially on I4s. You could possibly see that gain on a V8. Assuming they're talking about WHP and not imaginary crank with no accessories running on an engine stand horsepower.

>>16072751
>not having the air intake outside the engine bay
pleb

>dual exhaust performance package +10hp
>Exhaust splits into 2 at the very end of the single exhaust pipe
>+15lbs
>On a n/a 4 cylinder

File: 1472085178851.jpg (1MB, 1600x560px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1600x560px

They sound great. That's why I've put one on all of my cars since 2005.

>removing filter encapsulated in a pressurized airbox
>converting to open engine bay drawn pod filter
Sounds legit

>>16072794
Make sure that they are as close to the exhaust manifold as possible for maximum sound.
It will be fuck as fuck

File: 100_0918.jpg (192KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1024x768px

>>16072751
>stock intake has small tube that bottlenecks into the airbox
>said bottleneck sits pretty much touching coolant hose warming the intake air
>call it infallible manufacturer engineering

>replace exhaust, downpipe, intake, and charge pipe because muh bottlenecks
>turbo was and still is the smallest bottleneck, zero HP gains

File: 100_1004.jpg (183KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 1024x768px

>>16072806
>aftermarket intake doesn't bottleneck crazily like stock intake
>aftermarket intake isn't resting against coolant hose warming the intake air
>filter sits behind the driver side fog light, far away from engine heat

It's almost like all aftermarket intakes aren't the same quality and don't have the same amount of engineering going into them.

>>16072818
Show me one turbo car that doesn't benefit from I/DP/E please.

Just because your air intake is less restrictive doesn't mean you are going to get more air. The engine decides how much air it needs, and packing in more than the ideal air:fuel ratio is pointless

>>16072796
>encapsulated
>pressurized

sounds restrictive as fuck

youre running a mile

you want some cool air through a straw or breathing in of warm air through your nose/mouth?

>>16072751
>shorten springs, ruining geometry and suspension travel
>claiming a handling improvement

>17" street wheels on dirt bikes
>and then even putting offroad tires on said street wheels

>>16072873
Are the springs linear or progressive? Is an alignment being done?

>>16072893

...got any pics?

Never seen this, but I`m not a bikefag.

>weigh 300 pounds
>move battery to trunk for muh weight distribution

File: 1458612475812.png (72KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 625x626px

>>16072841
Here's your (You)

>>16072824
Prolly just about any modern one. They might spool up a bit faster, but unless the ecu is told to do something different, you arn't going to see a big hp increase.

>>16072770
>They can free up some HP in the event that the intake was a restriction
My oldest car, a 92, has enough intake to crank up the boost a bit without being a restriction.

>>16072806

What car is this looks familiar

I put a short ram intake into my car because the previous owner fucked up the previous intake and it was easier to just swap it than try to find the parts and fix the weird snorkel system honda uses

>>16073007
It's the Ferd 2.3L

File: 100_1400.jpg (193KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 1024x768px

>>16073007
This.

>>16073104
I wish, it's Duratec20. Looks the same, different deck height though.