>I want to be faster than a civic but slower than a v6

>>16057886
>my depths as a car enthusiast ends at stoplight racing: the post

>>16057886
>OP has autism: the post.

File: 1476791546295.jpg (15KB, 250x238px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 250x238px

>>16057894
>>16057897
Triggered vapecucks come out of the woodwork

>>16057886

thats a nice camry dear

File: 1469947766606.gif (776KB, 514x667px) Image search: [Google]

776KB, 514x667px

>>16057917
No one cares that one beat you in your civic faggot, go have asspain somewhere else.

>>16057886
So an 07 sienna can beat this?

>>16057886
Can't you boost these till they're stupidly quick?

File: WRX 2002 Soon.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>>16057886

>I want a car that does speed, fun, practicality, and reliability all reasonably well.

Wagon only tho.

File: superthumb.jpg (70KB, 300x250px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 300x250px

>>16057967
>speed
Barely beats v6 Camry or accord and needs a shit ton of mods to make it anywhere near "quick"
> fun
Has one of the worst manual transmissions of any car and rev hangs like a bitch
> reliability
Le head gasket face
> practicality
Like I.said before this gets smoked by tracy mcbasicbitch's Sienna and has half the capacity

>>16057997

Newsflash, no one cares

>>16057917
>>16057997
Did a Subaru driver steal your bf or something OP?

>>16057997
>Has one of the worst manual transmissions of any car and rev hangs like a bitch
The transmission is shitty on the early WRXs but the rev hang is a brand new issue only found on the 15s and 16s. You're conflating two generations of car into one extra shitty generation of car that doesn't actually exist.

I doubt that minivans are faster

>>16058799

Even a minivan that outdoes a WRX in a straight line has no chance once a corner appears :)

>>16057886
what mini van is faster than this

>>16057997

The turbo gaskets are much better than the NA gaskets

File: VapeLordsBtfo.png (195KB, 556x537px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 556x537px

>>16057894
>>16057897
>>16057930
>>16058009
>>16058038
>>16058073
>>16058799
>>16059008
Stay slow and unreliable vapelords.
Dont you have lesbian convention to attend to? kek

File: 1476997233553.png (582KB, 960x924px) Image search: [Google]

582KB, 960x924px

>>16059168
B t f o
t
f
o

>>16058799
they certainly arent, these cars (non sti) will still turn a high 13 second 1/4.

>>16058828
Yes. The WRX will understeer right off a cliff. Don't pretend that it can handle.

File: 96-turbo-caravan-burnout-600[1].jpg (32KB, 600x332px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x332px

>>16059008
>>16058799

File: Alonso-WouldRatherBe.jpg (251KB, 1536x864px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 1536x864px

>>16059168
>>2016
>>New type R actually manages to have a more basic rear suspension than the original Civic type R
Honda has shit the bed, new type R is meh, new nsx, meh and the 3cyl diesel engines they're supplying to McLaren are a joke.

Let's be honest, the Focus is the more desirable car unless you REALLY care about fwd in which case you're better off in the not hideous Megane.

>>16057886
>slower than a v6 minivan
So a Ferrari 458, Porsche 918, Nissan GTR, C7 corvette, ect?

As we all know, nothing is faster on the road then a run down minivan.

>>16059168
>>16059542
>Replying to your own post

And do people really think theyre clever with these shitty troll thteads?

>>16059847
>y-you replied to your own post so your argument is invalid
On a scale of 1 to ethylene glycol how triggered are you?

>>16057886
Which minivan are you talking about OP?

>>16059847
>posting in an alphonse thread

>>16059810
t. never even sat in one
I have two subarus, one NA and one turbo and neither has an understeer issue. Helps that they have larger (factory) sway bars and limited slip rear diffs, I can't say if the NA ones with an open rear do understeer.

File: 20161025_113714.jpg (701KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

701KB, 1440x2560px

>>16059921
This one

>>16059944
>responding to this garbage thread
I think he older ones were prone to mild understeer but the new ones have brake vectoring wizardry and/or revised suspension. A common mod for an autocross car was a stiffer rear swaybar to make them rotate easier.

File: 20161025_114152.jpg (670KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

670KB, 1440x2560px

>>16059958
How will subicucks recover?

>>16059958
Since when is HP = speed? What's the 0-60? What the quarter?

>>16060025
No replacement for horsepowerpacement

File: poobaruwilltrytodefend.jpg (172KB, 1575x1050px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1575x1050px

>>16060025
If laptimes = speed, this thing beats the WRX around willow springs :^)

>>16057886
>slower than a v6 minivan


Which minivans have a 5 second 0-60 time?

>>16057886
Rather have an evo t b h but they are basically the same car lel

>>16059958
>>16059966
It also weighs 1,000 pounds more than the subaru so it's still slow as fuck, that HP number means nothing.

>0-60 in 7.3 seconds
slooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow

>>16060115
But doesn't subie loose hp due to drive train losses due to muh awd

>>16060801
The sienna is also AWD. And even with AWD it's still 2 seconds slower from 0-60 than the base WRX. Sure the FWD version may have a slightly less lossy drivetrain, but you can't launch it for shit because it's front wheel drive, plus I don't think you can get the top of the line engine in the FWD version anyway.

I don't know why this comparison's even being made, it doesn't make any sense because nothing is equivalent except the the amount of horsepower, which means nothing if the other specifications are wildly dissimilar.

>>16060801
Power to weight is literally the only metric that matters

Nice try op, but the slower than a minivan meme applies to the BRZ not the WRX

Just how bad is the Impreza/Crosstrek?

I appreciate the ruggedness and simplicity, but don't need or want that much power from a WRX. From what I understand, the CVT is garbage and prefer the manual, but they are awful as well.

>>16061293
>I don't know why this comparison's even being made
Because unfortunately this isn't /k/-cars edition, its Xbox Live voice chat- cars edition.

Everyone here is here to troll, and *only* troll. Not a single person here gives a flying fuck about cars.

File: both.png (88KB, 260x260px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 260x260px

>>16061462

>>16057997
>Has one of the worst manual transmissions of any car and rev hangs like a bitch
what the fuck does this even mean?

File: Toyocuck2.jpg (49KB, 708x511px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 708x511px

>>16061690
Bad. It's made by subaru

>>16060801
Not really, you can change up the torque distribution in the WRX stock

>>16057886
>I'm jealous of nice things and am a giant faggot, the post

>>16062327
Only in the STI.

>>16062371
I'm pretty sure you can on the WRX as well. While its not direct and inuitive on the STi I'm pretty sure you have a manual way of doing it on the WRX. It doesn't make sense that the car is always AWD 50-50 on pavement

>>16062398
I have one, it's definitelys not user adjustable.

>>16062398
Nah, you're wrong. There is no way to adjust where the torque goes on a WRX.

>>16059832
>Honda has shit the bed
Damage control

Stay mad vapelord

http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2015/03/10-sports-cars-the-civic-type-r-beat-around-the-n

>>16062643
doesn't really make up for being even uglier than the WRX

>>16062319
Early WRX's were known for having weak gearboxes, which is only true if you're launching the thing constantly.

Rev hang = Stupid drive-by-wire dogshit where the throttle stays open a bit longer after you've let off the gas. It's for emissions or some crap (the throttle slamming shut suddenly causes unburned fuel? idk) and pretty much only furthers the case against electronic throttles.

>>16062895
Yeah it's for emissions. Easily tuned away, but then you also open up a chance for a warranty claim denial if something happens to the engine.

>>16062442
Pics

File: 2016-05-09 17.41.16.jpg (937KB, 2412x1236px) Image search: [Google]

937KB, 2412x1236px

>>16063206

>>16062775
>subjective
damage control: electric boogaloo

>>16057997
How are you not a tripfag, I am baffled.

>>16064144
What damage am I controlling? They're both ugly cars. Doesn't matter how fast either one is if I wouldn't want to be inside either of them.

>>16059832
>3 cylinder diesel
they're gasoline V6s, wtf?

>>16057886
This is like saying a ferrari is shit at rally