>2015 Raptor has 6.2 V8 >2017 Raptor has 3.6 V6 EcoBoost

They have a monopoly on the factory extreme off road/mall crawler market so they can shit out whatever they please.

>still no single cab configuration
my dreams will continue to be shattered.

>implying the ecoBEAST won't make more power and torque than some pleb v8 while being lighter too

>3.6 V6
Bait

>>16057319
This
I was like what the fuck there's no 3.6

>>16057319
>>16057549
Sorry, 3.5

Either way - 70 fucking grand for a truck that sounds worse than a Honda https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WJEv800IxQY

File: raptor_f150[1].jpg (574KB, 2012x1200px) Image search: [Google]

574KB, 2012x1200px

2017: The Year not to buy a Raptor

>>16057647
First year of anything that's extreme as a Raptor or Hellcat is something to avoid.

File: 1447263866791.jpg (92KB, 499x312px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 499x312px

>>16057566
>muh sound
Do people like you actually exist?

function>form

V6 makes significantly more HP and torque than the V8.

>>16057668
>V6 aluminum truck
>Function

Pick one

>>16057707
Best in class towing

Cue the damage control fag

>>16057711
>Best in class
>The half ton class

LOL

>>16057716
>damage control
As expected

I forgot it the F450 is best in class too.

Cue the damage control gm fag

File: IMG_20161015_144918.jpg (1MB, 3072x1728px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3072x1728px

>>16057721
>being jealous of an aluminum truck

>>16057734
>no actual argument
As expected

>>16057755
How is towing capacity on a half ton $70k truck an argument?

>>16057762
Stay btfo

File: aluminum-foil.jpg (17KB, 278x300px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 278x300px

>>16057755

File: 150729161530-ford-f150-supercab-780x439.jpg (229KB, 780x439px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 780x439px

>>16057810
>soda can of a truck
lmao ford btfo

File: Screen_Shot_20160702_at_5.33.06_PM.png (97KB, 749x583px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 749x583px

>>16057823
Is that why it's the only truck with a 5 star crash safety rating?

File: u72gb.png (611KB, 764x507px) Image search: [Google]

611KB, 764x507px

>>16057852
Will gm fangirls defend this? Or is it just damage control from here?

>>16057852
Crash ratings don't mean shit. It takes more damage to the truck itself. More expensive to repair, meaning faster to getting totaled.

File: CmyXY4jWcAAt9J5.jpg (179KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 1200x900px

>>16057868
>damage control
As expected

Stay btfo

>>16057684
Horsepower in a V6 is a meme
I have 340 HP in my v6 car and the car is significantly weaker than the v8 truck I had with the same horsepower

>>16057874
That isn't good for an off road truck.

>>16057883
Stay btfo

>>16057273
>muh sound
Literally the only reason the V8 would be better.

>>16057868
I guess if you care more about your truck than your life

>>16057880
That's because of the lack of torque. Egoboost has turbos so it helps with the torque issue. But you already have a strained forced induction engine. Meanwhile a v8 has near the same numbers and you still can turbo or supercharge it.

>>16057900
>goodbye mpg

>>16057891
Your truck will end up like this >>16057734

Receives costly and unnecessary damage when it really didn't save your life. Then because you paid $70k for a truck you don't have any insurance to repair it.

>>16057908
>Giving a fuck about mpgs on a performance off road truck

>>16057908
Toyota Tacoma has worse mpg than a V8 1500
Kys v6 shill

All its about is stiffing the consumer. Yeah the engine is lighter which means Ford and friends are paying less for materials while charging you the same amount of money. Guess who pockets the difference - it sure ain't you.

>>16057925
>false equivalencies
As expected
>>16057922
>damage control
As expected

>>16057925
>Toyota Tacoma has worse mpg than a V8 1500
if you actually believe that you probably have downs.

>>16057945
Its true, read a fucking book

>>16057938
No matter what the raptor is getting single digit mpg off road. It's getting a 36 gallon tank for a reason.

Please just make one with an actual bed ffs

>>16057925
Yeah because materials is the only thing that gets factored into production costs, not product research, production and assembly complexity etc.

>>16057938
>>16057945
I own a tacoma, mileage is pretty horrible.

>>16057566
Jesus it sounds like a cheap vacuum.

>>16057986
Sponsored by ShopVac.
Nothing sucks like it.

File: CORVETTE_BTFO.png (934KB, 831x613px) Image search: [Google]

934KB, 831x613px

Same V6 that won lemans.

That must be why gm fags are raging itt.

>>16057273
HAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAH

BOOMER FAGS BLOWN THE FUCK OUT!
V8 GARGLERS BLOWN THE FUCK OUT!
HOW WILL YOU OLD TIMERS EVER RECOVER!?

>>16058903
>edgy

>>16057273
>tfw Ford will never make a 2017 F-150 Lightning with a tuned Voodoo

>>16057925
are you implying that lighter materials are cheaper?

>>16057273
>2017 Raptor has 3.6 V6 EcoBoost
Cafe standards. Your gubmint loves you.

>>16057283

No they fucking don't. If you're going to buy an oversized, unnecessary dick extender, you have a fuck ton of options. Chrysler is the undisputed king of this. Wranglers and Rams are THE douchebag vehicles. You can buy them from factory with big lifts and huge tires with better features for the same cost as a Raptor.

The Rebel, Power Wagon, Sahara, Black Ops Edition, and SRT Grand Cherokee are all WAY more bro that the Raptor. So far as I've ever seen, Raptors get sold to middle aged men with more money than they know what to do with and no idea what a good truck is.

>>16057721

The F450 is only best in class because Ford cheats the metric. The 350 is weaker than the Ram 3500 and the 450 is weaker than the Ram 4500. It's a horseshit metric.

>>16059028
So much assmad, lol

>>16059030

Why the fuck would I be mad? I don't need a fucking truck that large and I never will. It's just retarded that people parrot that shit when it's a known fact of how false it is.

I hate to bring up any memery but...
It also has a 10 speed automatic transmission.

File: dc1f749691926950443c48a835767bcb.jpg (29KB, 236x359px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 236x359px

>>16059239
Dude just dont bother. You could work at fucking ford and produce information and the only response youll ever get from ford (or GM) shills is
>lol damagecontrolassmad

Youre basically arguing with pic related.

>>16059308
>Youre basically arguing with pic related
but hondafags dont belong in a v8 argument.

File: 82810.jpg (66KB, 501x500px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 501x500px

>>16059328
Neither does ecoboost V6 fucbois. I dont really participate in these arguments cause its usually populated with no wrenching fuckfuck normies. I imagine the same people saying how bad ass the ecoboost is the same people who make fun of the ones that do their own maintenance.

I mean hell, they use "muh mpgs tho" as an argument for high powered modified motors, so it makes sense.

i don't see a problem here

a lot of raptors don't even see any dirt, ever, or do anything that will require the 6.2 so it's fine

and its 2016, you should already expect downsizing