Why does no one talk about this on here? They are cheap as shit

>>16036220
>$35k for a gm-powered slow turd
If it's so cheap then where's yours?

I never knew about this. This is cool

>>16036230
That Weighs 1700 pounds.
It's slow stock, but there's a bolt on supercharger kit.

It's basically a US Atom for 1/3th the price

>>16036241
>spending $40k+ on that abomination
No.

>>16036241
It also has 1/3rd the design and R&D. The atom is priced the way it is for good reason.

>>16036263
>suddenly 5k more
>despite a 21k base and a 10k conversion, and 2-3k in logistics...

Regardless, I have just never heard of it before on /o/, despite the constant arguments of "pigfat" cars.
I mean, it doesn't seem that bad really.

>>16036298
>supercharger and tuning is now free
You're a fucking retard.

>>16036220
It's a toy for rich people. I see them only when I'm in an extremely wealthy area and usually they travel in couples; like a "his" and "hers" type of deal.

Gives me cancer every time.

>>16036302
You fucking bet.

Still deviating from the point...

Is this how white people drive them? I've only seen basketball americans driving the regular ones

File: IMG_4795.jpg (71KB, 592x598px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 592x598px

>>16036241
>1/3th

>>16036315
>y-youre just deviating from the point
>why won't people like the same thing I like whaaaaa
>its slow but thetrs a supercharger
>I didn't mean you had to get it though!
Moron.

>>16036318
Seriously. I saw this nigger in one and he had on a skull cap and a leather "biker gang" jacket.

>>16036279
Because it's British and was featured on Top Gear