>the year of our lord 2020-4 >people still think 50/50

>>15946730

>40f-60r master race coming to a tree near you

ftfy

File: 1447644874040.png (387KB, 598x369px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 598x369px

>>15946752
>being this butthurt that literally the best racecars and sports cars of the world got that distribution or similar

Tell me how great it is to lose control in your shitty miata, senpai.

50/50 is great dude. Maybe not the fastest setup on the track (40/60 is probably around ideal, you're right) but I just like 50/50 because its predictable, easy to control, and easy to drift. And because I'm not chasing tenths of a second on the street, I dont really mind that it's not technically ideal for muh laptimes. It's more fun.

We can all agree that front heavy cars are bad though, right?

>>15946938
Yes. Although something akin 55f 45r would be better for daily use.

I just like to see fags talk about how 50/50 is perfect for track use, city use, drift use, heavy load use, stability, etc.


Seems nobody remembers the AE86, the NSX, the best Group C cars, including the F1 has 40f60r weight distro.

>>15946730

How does it feel being a bench racer?

old muscle cars handled great and had a majority of the weight on the front

>>15946730
>Lotus Elise is the best car
Maybe
But still
Preferences

File: 1413623526498.gif (902KB, 200x150px) Image search: [Google]

902KB, 200x150px

>>15948112
>old muscle cars handled great

>>15946997
AE86 is 53/47 or something

>>15946997
how would an ae86 be 40f60r when the engine is in the front? what they got at the back?!

>>15948112
Ill need your definition of handling, please, because I think you're using it wrong.

File: you_redoingitwrong.png (82KB, 500x501px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 500x501px

>>15946730

>>15948249
They put Itsuki in the back seat

>>15946786
I'm not sure about a Miata, but a 50/50 Viper is faster than any other street legal car.

>>15948473
Kek

>>15948546
It would be faster as 60 percent in the rear.

History has only showed us how 40 f 60 r is perfect for track and time attack usage.

Look at how old muscle cars front-heavy would have to oversteer almost every fucking corner in the old Trans Am.

More weight on the rear = more grip
More grip on the rear = you can apply more power when you exit a corner.

File: porsche 918.jpg (37KB, 570x407px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 570x407px

>>15948546

>a 50/50 viper is faster than any other street legal car

surely you jest

Would you want 40/60 for a FF car? Wouldn't it be better to have the bias on front?

>>15949311
This thread only applies to GOOD cars.

AKA = Rear wheel drive or all wheel drive.

>>15949351
I can't hear you over the sound of efficiency

>>15949392
>muh mpgees
poorfag

>>15949417
I can't hear you over the money I'm saving thanks to efficiency

>>15949417
>FWD cars are paired with shitty engines with good MPG
>"hurr durr muh FWD iz m00re fuel efficient cuz there's an extra hp towing the car from the front suck it Retard Wheel Drive Fags"

File: wpR1p8.gif (2MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x270px

>>15949446
This

>>15949444
Ya that 7% improvement in drivetrain loss is sure gonna make you rich