Alright, so, we all know Toyota pickups are the literal war chariot

Nope, they're plastic lifestyle toys nowadays.

>>15934548
Hi, I thought they were at the very least somewhat tough for off-road stuff, then what excuse do they have for being so impractical and stupid looking?

>>15934715
It's an iconic design. That's it.

>>15934715
Its the fact they arent reliable, expensive, and suck compared to toyota pickups

>>15934531
yeah, the original willy's jeep has been ripped of a million ways, if that's what you're asking.

>owning a heep

>>15934531
No, but when the U.S. eventually becomes a third-world country, Jeeps are what we'll use for our tribal skirmishes. The upshot is that no two clans more than a 35- minute drive from each other could make it to a fight.

>>15934715
>what excuse do they have for being so impractical and stupid looking?
Just like every other FCA product, retards will buy them no matter what.

>over priced
>not reliable
>not easy or cheap to fix or modify
there's a reason those junk heaps were phased out as fast as the US could find a reasonable replacement

>>15937319
>>over priced
Can't argue with this especially for what you're getting

>>not reliable
Can't argue with this either
Chrysler is literally shit

>>not easy or cheap to fix or modify
This is where I'm not so sure if you're correct. I like the wrangler because it's literally just a simple metal box on a frame. Also there seems to be decent support for engine swaps.

>there's a reason those junk heaps
The military uses a somewhat similar vehicle for lightweight and compact transportation that they can fit several into an v22 osprey...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqDlmC4nz6U

File: IMG_1828.gif (3MB, 206x206px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 206x206px

>>15936953
Kek'd heartily